medigraphic.com

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2018; 17 (3)

A general approach to modern teleradiology: Development, benefits and challenges

Alonso-Que HT, Castillo-Uribe L, Gómez-Fraga S, Ramírez-Arias JL

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 166-173
PDF size: 205.74 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Teleradiology is the most developed of the telemedicine service which involves the electronic transmission of radiographic images between two geographical locations, for purposes of interpretation and consultation. Regulatory frameworks are the foundation of any regulation in Mexico do not yet have an official rule in telemedicine involving teleradiology, however the National Center for Health Technology Excellence works in the construction of Project Mexican Official Standard NOM-036-SSA3-2013. Teleradiology provides benefits to health institutions as the possibility of remote interconsultations allowing expand coverage more accessible, facilitating that can meet peak workload, provide a permanent service, reduce waiting lists for certain examinations and, above all, lower costs. In countries like ours, it is necessary to take measures to ensure legal certainty aspects, timeliness and high-quality care without these aspects endanger the operational and financial sustainability of radiology and general health.


REFERENCES

  1. Ranscahert ER, Barnevedl FHB. European teleradiology now and in the future: results of an online survey. Insights imaging. 2013;4:93-102.

  2. American College of Radiology. ACR standard for teleradiology. (Consultado el 15 de enero de 2012.) Disponible en: www.acr.org

  3. Page G, Gregoire A, Garland, et al. Teleradiology in Northern Quebec. Radiology. 1981;140:361-6.

  4. DeCorato DR, Kagetsu NJ, Ablow RC. Off-hours interpretation of patients admitted to the emergency department: efficacy of teleradiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1293-6.

  5. Wilson AJ. Is teleradiology the solution to after-hours emergency radiology coverage. Radiographics. 1996;16:939-42.

  6. Kopec AP, Salazar AG. Aplicaciones de telecomunicaciones en salud en la región andina. Telemedicina. Historia. 2.ª ed. Bogotá, Colombia; 2006. p. 11-4.

  7. Ramírez AJL. Nueva tecnología en radiología e imagen de los hospitales ángeles: PACS y RIS. Acta Médica Grupo Ángeles. 2005;3:279-86.

  8. Ebbert TL, Meghea C, Iturbe S, et al. The state of teleradiology in 2003 and changes since 1999. Am J Radiol. 2007;188:103-12.

  9. Gur D, Fuhrman CR, Thaete FL. InfoRAD: computers for clinical practice and education in radiology. Requirements for PACS: user perspective. Radiographics. 1993;13:457-60.

  10. Partovi S. RIP: Radiology Internet Protocol. Radiographics. 1996;16:1495- 501.

  11. Hussein R, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP. DICOM structured reporting. Part 1. Overview and characteristics. Radiographics. 2004;24:891-6.

  12. Hussein R. Schroeter A, Meinzer HP. DICOM structured reporting. Part 2. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. Radiographics. 2004;24:897-909.

  13. Silva E, Breslau J. Barr RB, et al. ACR White paper on teleradiology practice: a report from the task force on teleradiology practice. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;20:11-5.

  14. Marcos normativos para el uso de la telesalud. (Consultado el 30 de septiembre de 2015.) Disponible en: http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/contenidos/ telesalud/marco_norma.html

  15. Canadian Association of Radiologists. CAR standards for teleradiology. (Consultado en mayo de 2008.) Disponible en: http://www.car.ca/ uploads/standards%20guidelines/standard_teleradiology_en.pdf

  16. Marcos normativos para el uso de la telesalud. (Consultado en septiembre de 2015.) Disponible en: http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/contenidos/ telesalud/marco_norma.html

  17. Secretaría de Salud. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-229-SSA1-2002. Diario Oficial de la Federación. (Consultado el 15 de septiembre de 2006.) Disponible en: http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/229ssa102. pdf

  18. Estrategia Digital Nacional. Salud Universal y Efectiva. (Consultado en noviembre de 2013.) Disponible en: cdn.mexicodigital.gob.mx/EstrategiaDigital. pdf

  19. Thrall JH. Teleradiology. Part I: history and clinical applications. Radiology. 2007;243:613-7.

  20. Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud. Serie Tecnologías en salud. Vol. 3. Telemedicina. 2.ª ed. México; 2014. p. 14-6.

  21. Prados JAC. Telemedicina, una herramienta también para el médico de familia. Aten Primaria. 2013;45:129-32.

  22. Kumar S, Krupinski EA. Teleradiology. Future goals and benefits. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008. p. 13-4.

  23. Acosta L, Ruibal KF; Diagnostic Imaging Integrated Network. A teleradiology pilot in public hospitals in Uruguay. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:923.

  24. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Programa eHealth OPS: herramientas y metodologías TIC para mejorar la salud pública en la Región de las Américas. Washington DC: OPS c2007-2011. Disponible en: http://new. paho.org/ict4health/images/stories/ict4health/ehealth-program-spa.pdf

  25. Reiner BI, Knight N, Siegel EL. Radiology reporting. Past, present and future: the radiologist’s perspective. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:313-9.

  26. Berlin L. Communicating findings of radiological examinations: whither goest the radiologist’s duty? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:809-15.

  27. Dalla Palma L, Stacul F, Meduri S, Geitung JT. Relationships between radiologists and clinicians: results of three surveys. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:602-5.

  28. Fitzgerald R. Error in radiology. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:938-46.

  29. Thrall JH. Teleradiology. Part II: limitations, risks and opportunities. Radiology. 2007;244:325-8.

  30. Kalyanpur A, Neklesa VP, Pham DT, et al. Implementation of an international teleradiology staffing model. Radiology. 2004;232:415-9.

  31. Borgstede JP. Radiology: commodity or specialty. Radiology. 2008;247:613-6.

  32. Normas técnicas en tecnologías de información y comunicación. Anexo – NTP3. Evaluación de riesgo en tecnologías de la información. Disponible en: http://jaguar.cgr.go.cr/content/dav/jaguar/documentos/cgr/Sistemas/ Normas_Tecnicas/Informe%20NT

  33. ECRI institute. ECRI institute announces top 10 health technology hazards for 2015. Disponible en: www.ecri.org/2015hazards

  34. World Health Organization. eHealth tools and services: needs of the member states. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2006. Disponible en: http://www. who.int/goe/publications/ehealth_tools_services/en/index.html

  35. Hryhorzcuk AL, Hanneman K, Eisenberg, et al. Radiologic professionalism in modern health care. Radiographics. 2015;35:1779-88.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com