medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Clínica de la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Costa Rica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Clin Esc Med 2019; 9 (2)

Dispositivo Intrauterino de Cobre como Anticoncepción de Emergencia

Garbanzo ND, Peralta RR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 10-14
PDF size: 428.19 Kb.


Key words:

Emergency contraception, Copper Intrauterine device (Cu IUD), unintended pregnancy.

ABSTRACT

Unintended pregnancy is a pending issue of women’s sexual and reproductive health rights, emergency contraception is a second opportunity to avoid an unintended pregnancy. The copper intrauterine device is the most effective option for emergency contraception. However, it is the least used method, factors such as counseling and personal health training to place the device are some of those identified as responsible. It offers benefits such as the start of a safe planning method for up to 10 years. Adverse effects and complications are rare, including uterine perforation or pelvic inflammatory disease. Its use is contraindicated if the pregnancy is confirmed. Anticoncepción de emergencia; Dispositivos intrauterino de cobre (DIU Cu); Embarazo no deseado. Emergency contraception; Copper Intrauterine device (Cu IUD); unintended pregnancy.


REFERENCES

  1. Ministerio de Salud. II Encuesta Nacional de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva Costa Rica 2015 [Internet]. Centro centroamericano de población; 2016 [consultado diciembre 2018]. Disponible en: https://ccp.ucr.ac.cr/documentos/portal/Informe- 2daEncuesta-2015.pdf.

  2. Organización mundial de la Salud. En todo el mundo se producen aproximadamente 25 millones de abortos peligrosos al año[Internet]. Ginebra; 28 de septiembre de 2017[consultado diciembre 2018]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/ detail/28-09-2017-worldwide-an-estimated-25- million-unsafe-abortions-occur-each-year.

  3. Gemzell-Danielsson K Berger C Lalitkumar P. Emergency contraception — mechanisms of action. Contraception. 2013; 87(3): 300-308.

  4. Batur P Kransdorf L Casey P. Emergency Contraception. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016; 91(6): 802-807.

  5. Lalitkumar P Berger C Gemzell-Danielsson K. Emergency contraception. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 27(1): 91-101.

  6. Stuart G. Métodos anticonceptivos y esterilización. En: Hoffman B. Williams Ginecología. 3ed. Ciudad de México, México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores, S.A. De C.V; 2017;105-136.

  7. Turok D. The Copper IUD and emergency contraception. Contraception. 2011; 84(2): 205-206.

  8. Searle E. The intrauterine device and the intrauterine system. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 28(6): 807-824.

  9. Edwards C Panjwani D Pendrith C Ly A Dunn S. Knowledge of and Interest in the Copper Intrauterine Device Among Women Seeking Emergency Contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018; 40(1); 41-47.

  10. Belden P Harper C Speidel J. The copper IUD for emergency contraception, a neglected option. Contraception. 2012; 85(4) 338-339.

  11. Wright R Frost C Turok D. Experiences of Advanced Practitioners with Inserting the Copper Intrauterine Device as Emergency Contraception. Womens Health Issues. 2016; 26(5);523-528.

  12. Goodman S El Ayadi A Rocca C et al. The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know? Contraception. 2018; 98 (2): 115-119.

  13. Fields Y Lundsberg L McDonald-Mosely R Gariepy A Stanwood N. Which women choose a copper IUD for emergency contraception when offered the same day? Contraception. 2015; 92(4):388-388.

  14. Heinemann K Reed S Moehner S Minh T. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015; 91(4): 274-279.

  15. Papic M Wang N Parisi S Baldauf E Updike G Schwarz E. Same-Day Intrauterine Device Placement is Rarely Complicated by Pelvic Infection. Women’s Health Issues. 2015; 25(1): 22-27.

  16. Parry J. When IUP meets IUD. Fertil Steril.2018; 110(7): 1274-1274.

  17. Leung V Soon J Lynd L Marra C Levine M. Population-based evaluation of the effectiveness of two regimens for emergency contraception. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 133(3): 342-346.

  18. Bellows B Tak C Sanders J Turok D Schwarz E. Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218(5): 508. e1-508.e9.

  19. Dermish A Turok D Kim J. Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception — IUDS versus oral EC. Contraception. 2012;86(3); 316-316.

  20. Turok DJ. Sanders J Thompson I Royer P Gawron L K. Storck K. IUD continuation when initiated as emergency contraception. Contraception. 2015; 92(4): 360-360.

  21. Sanders J Turok D Royer P Thompson I Gawron L Storck K. One-year continuation of copper or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices initiated at the time of emergency contraception. Contraception. 2017; 96(2): 99-105.

  22. Turok D Gurtcheff S Handley E Simonsen S Sok CMurphy P. A pilot study of the Copper T380A IUD and oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. Contraception. 2010; 82(6): 520-525.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Clin Esc Med. 2019;9