medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2019; 64 (4)

Clinical presentation and endoscopic approach of frontal sinus recess fungal ball and secondary mucocele

Pirrón LJA, Hernández CLE
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/BC194L

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/BC194L
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/BC194L

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 302-306
PDF size: 186.81 Kb.


Key words:

Frontal fungal ball, frontal mucocele, Draf.

ABSTRACT

Fungal ball is the most common type of fungal rhinosinusitis. It is a variety of non-invasive rhinosinusitis (without tissue invasion) that typically occurs in immunocompetent patients. It is defined as an agglomeration of detrites and hyphaes within a paranasal sinus. Its most common location is the maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses, and the most frequently involved etiological agent is Aspergillus sp. Reports in the world literature of its presentation within the frontal sinus show an incidence of only 2% of the cases. A review of the literature on nasosinusal fungal balls and frontal mucoceles was made, taking as a reference the case of a 67-year-old male patient with a history of two craniotomies who presented with fungal ball in the frontal sinus recess and secondary mucocele that was managed by an endoscopic Draf IIa approach to the frontal sinus.


REFERENCES

  1. Lop-Gros J, Gras-Cabrerizo JR, Bothe-González C, Montserrat-Gili J, Sumarroca-Trouboul A, Massegur-Solench H. Bola fúngica sinusal: análisis de nuestra casuística. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2016; 67 (4): 220-225.

  2. Robey A, O’Brien E, Richardson B, Baker J, Poage D, Leopold D. The changing face of paranasal sinus fungus balls. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009; 118 (7): 500-505.

  3. Grosjean P, Weber R. Fungus balls of the paranasal sinuses: a review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 264: 461-470.

  4. Bosi GR, de Braga GL, de Almeida TS, de Carli A. Fungus ball of the paranasal sinuses: Report of two cases and literature review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 16 (2): 286-290.

  5. Kennedy A, Chowdhury H, Athwal S, Baddeley P. Frontal sinus mucocoele: a rare cause of ptosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015. pii: bcr2015211068.

  6. Sama A, McClelland L, Constable J. Frontal sinus mucocoeles: new algorithm for surgical management. Rhinology. 2014; 52 (3): 267-275.

  7. Aguilar SJA, Pirrón LJA. Abordaje osteoplástico para el tratamiento de mucopiocele frontal. Comunicación de un caso. An Orl Mex. 2009; 54 (1): 40-44.

  8. deShazo RD, O’Brien M, Chapin K, Soto-Aguilar M, Swain R, Lyons M et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of sinus mycetoma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997; 99 (4): 475-485.

  9. Bernardini E, Karligkiotis A, Fortunato S, Castelnuovo P, Dallan I. Surgical and pathogenic considerations on frontal fungus ball. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 274: 2493-2497.

  10. Nomura K, Hidaka H, Arakawa K, Sugawara M, Ozawa D, Okumura Y et al. Outcomes of frontal mucoceles treated with conventional endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015; 135 (8): 819-823.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC. 2019;64