medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2019, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2019; 76 (6)

Indirect cementation protocol for fixed orthodontic appliances using commonly used materials

Munive-Méndez A, Caro-Cuellar MF

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 315-321
PDF size: 385.60 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The straight arch technique is one of the most used techniques for the correction of malocclusions in orthodontics; however, the success of the technique will lie in the accuracy in which the brackets are positioned in the correct position. This article presents an indirect cementation protocol which additionally allows greater accessibility to the materials required for this procedure. Objective: Present an effective and accessible indirect cementation protocol. Material and methods: For this protocol, materials such as brace cementation resin (Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, USA), acrylic insulator have been used to separate the brackets from the gypsum and liquid silicone model, usually used for cars (Silicone Kit, Johnson, Chile), to separate the brackets from the thermoplastic support, which was made with hot melt silicone. Conclusion: The indirect cementation protocol allows a good positioning of the brackets, reducing the possibility of repositioning during the alignment and leveling phases.


REFERENCES

  1. Grippaudo C, Paolantonio EG, Antonini G, Saulle R, La Torre G, Deli R. Association between oral habits, mouth breathing and malocclusion. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016; 36 (5): 386-394. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-770.

  2. Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance, arch form, wire bending and an experiment. J Clinical Orthod. 1976; 10: 581-589.

  3. Birdsall J, Hunt NP, Sabbah W, Moseley HC. Accuracy of positioning three types of self-ligating brackets compared with a conventionally ligating bracket. J Orthod, 2012; 39 (1): 34-42. doi: 10.1179/14653121226806.

  4. Silverman E, Cohen M, Gianelly AA. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod. 1972; 62: 236-244.

  5. Roelofs T, Merkens N, Roelofs J, Bronkhorst E, Breuning H. A retrospective survey of the causes of bracket- and tube-bonding failures. Angle Orthod. 2017; 87 (1): 111-117.

  6. Menini A, Cozzani M, Sfondrini M, Scribante A, Cozzani P, Gandini P. A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial. Prog Orthod [Internet]. 2014 [cited 24 June 2019]; 15 (1). Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-014-0070-9#citeas

  7. Barrueso-Martínez M, Martín-Martínez J. Adhesivos termofusibles en base EVA [Tesis]. España: Universidad de Alicante; 1997.

  8. Castilla A, Crowe J, Moses J, Wang M, Ferracane J, Covell DJ. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84 (4): 607-614.

  9. Pamukçu H, Özsoy ÖP. Indirect bonding revisited. Turk J Orthod. 2016; 29 (3): 80-86.

  10. Kalange J, Thomas R. Indirect bonding: a comprehensive review of the literature. Semin Orthod. 2007; 13: 3-10.

  11. Uribe-Restrepo GA. Ortodoncia, teoría y clínica. 2a ed. Medellín: Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas; 2010. p. 200.

  12. Nojima LI, Araújo AS, Alves-Júnior M. Indirect orthodontic bonding--a modified technique for improved efficiency and precision. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015; 20 (3): 109-117. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.109-117.sar.

  13. Higgins DW. Indirect bonding with light-cured adhesive and a hybrid transfer tray. Semin Orthod. 2007; 13 (1): 64-68. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2006.11.008.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com