De los Santos-Santiago J, Castellanos-Serafín JE

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 95-99
PDF size: 183.09 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Identifying by means of the precision of renal angiotomography (ATR) in the evaluation of the venous system and anatomical variants in the living donor, it is of importance that it will contribute to the success of the renal implant. Objective: To determine anatomical variants in renal veins of the renal donor under evaluation by angiotomography. Material and methods: Through an observational, prospective, cross-sectional, and single-center study; An image study was carried out by means of color ATR to the patients who came for renal donor study and to observe the presence of variants in the renal veins. The variables were collected: age, sex, comorbidity, kidney with variants, image diagnosis, in the period from December 2018 to September 2019. It was analyzed with means and standard deviation for quantitative variables and for qualitative absolute and relative frequencies; through the statistical package SPSSv24.0. Results: Sixty one patients underwent renal angiotomography, the mean age was 33.9 ± 8.7 years, male sex 35 (57%), in this group of patients no comorbidity was observed, the anatomical variant findings were observed in right kidney of 6 (9.8 %). The most frequent anatomical variants were double parallel renal vein with 4 (6.6%), late confluence in 2 (3.3%), no variants were observed in 49 (80.3%). Conclusion: The most frequent anatomical variants were double parallel renal vein.

REFERENCES

1. Dehesa LE. Enfermedad renal crónica; definición y clasificación. Residente. 2008; 3: 73-78.

2. Flores JC, Alvo M, Borja H, Morales J, Vega J, Zúñiga C et al. Enfermedad renal crónica: clasificación, identificación, manejo y complicaciones. Rev Méd Chile. 2009; 137 (1): 137-177.

3. César Loza Munarriz. La enfermedad renal crónica en el Perú, Epidemiología e impacto de la salud pública. Boletín Epidemiológico (Lima). 2014; 23: 36-38.

4. Méndez-Durán A, Méndez-Bueno JF, Tapia-Yáñez T, Muñoz- Montes A, Aguilar-Sánchez L. Epidemiología de la insuficiencia renal crónica en México. IME, BIREME, CINDOC. 2010; 31: 01.

5. Campistol JM. Riesgo cardiovascular en el paciente trasplantado renal. Nefrología. 2002; 22 (Supl. 4): 7-11.

6. Pascual J, Alonso A, Burgos D, Cruzado JM, Serón D. Disfunción renal crónica en pacientes trasplantados renales: Documento de Consenso. Nefrología (Madr.). 2012; 32 (Suppl 2): 01-28.

7. García JM, Pascual RD, Trívez BM, Sancho SC, Mallén MP, Gil MM et al. Trasplante renal: técnica y complicaciones. Actas Urol Esp. 2003; 27 (9): 662-677.

8. McMahon LP, Roger SD, Levin A. Development, prevention, and potential reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15: 1640-1047.

9. Kasiske BL, Cangro CB, Hariharan S et al. The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transplant. 2002; 1: 3-95.

10. Drachenberg CB, Hirsch HH, Papadimitriou JC et al. Polyomavirus BK versus JC replication and nephropathy in renal transplant recipients: a prospective evaluation. Transplantation. 2007; 84: 323-332.

11. Valdivia AJ, Gutiérrez GC, Delgado AE, Méndez FD, Treto RJ, Fernández MI. Superviviencia en el trasplante renal con donante vivo y donante fallecido. Invest Médicoquir. 2011; 3 (2): 102-111.

12. Sebastià C, Peri L, Salvador R, Buñesch L, Revuelta I, Alcaraz A, Nicolau C. Multidetector CT of living renal donors: lesson learned from surgeons. Radiographics. 2010; 7 (30): 1875-1890.

13. Pozniak MA, Balison DJ, Lee FT Jr, Tambeaux RH, Uehling DT, Moon TD. CT angiography of potential renal transplant donors. Radiographics. 1998; 18: 565-587.

14. Arévalo PJ, Gragera TF, Marín TA, Koren FL, Hayoun C, Daimiel NI et al. Angio CT assessment of anatomical variants in renal vasculature: its importance in the living donor. Insights Imaging. 2013; 4: 199-211.

15. Lladó C, Fuentes S, Mariano J, Paszkiewicz MR, Massé P, Iriarte G. Angiotomografía renal en el donante vivo y su correlación con la ablación quirúrgica. Rev Argent Radiol. 2017; 81 (4): 262- 269.

16. Smith PA, Ratner LE, Lynch FC et al. Role of CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Radiographics. 1998; 18: 589-601.

17. Satyapal KS. The renal veins: a review. Eur J Anat. 2003; 7 (Suppl. 1): 43-52.

18. Aldana G, Chadid T, Patiño G. Implicaciones clínicas y quirúrgicas de las variaciones anatómicas vasculares del riñón. Rev Cienc Salud. 2010; 8 (2): 61-76.

19. Alfrey EJ, Rubin G, Kuo PC et al. The use of spiral computed tomography in the evaluation of living donors for kidney transplantation. Radiology. 2005; 59: 643.

20. Álvarez A, Sebasriá Cerqueda C, Quiroga Gómez S. Angiografía por tomografía computarizada de los vasos renales. Arch Esp Urol. 2001; 54 (6): 603-615.

21. Guillén SM, Zaragozano GR, Gutierrez DA, Escartin MI, Riazuelo FG, Zaragoza/ES. TCMD en el donante vivo de riñón y en el seguimiento del donante vivo y de su receptor. Presentación Electrónica Científica. SERAM. 2014.

22. Batista HI, García BC, Hernández CC. Patrón común y variantes anatómicas de la vena renal. AMC. 2010; 14 (4): 1-8.

23. Saavedra AJ, Kimura FK, Alcantara CJ, Stoopen M, Ruíz SO, Cardona PM. Angiotomografía multicorte de arterias y venas renales. An Radiol Mex. 2004; 3: 169-174.

24. García-López RA, Gracida-Juárez C, Cedillo U, Cancino-López J, Espinoza-Pérez R. Variaciones vasculares en el injerto renal y sus resultados en el trasplante renal. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2010; 48 (2): 193-198.