medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica

ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Simulación Clínica 2019; 1 (3)

Protocol of training actors to simulate high fidelity scenarios in medical education

Coro-Montanet G, Diéguez-Pérez M, Cerdán-Gómez F, García-Villalobos MR, Gómez-Sánchez M, Pardo-Monedero MJ
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/RSC193E

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/RSC193E
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/RSC193E

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 144-148
PDF size: 179.07 Kb.


Key words:

Simulation-based learning, simulated participant, standardized patient, actor training, actor briefing.

ABSTRACT

Learning programmes based on clinical simulation provide a safe environment for the learner and prevent learning errors from manifesting themselves in patient care. The objective of this work is to share the protocol used in the briefing of actors for their training, faithful and standardized characterization of their roles as simulated participants. The protocol responds to the application experience of three years (2016-2019) of the research teaching group in clinical simulation of the Universidad Europea de Madrid. Having a functional protocol to train simulated participants that can be used to train professional actors or not, increases the fidelity of the scenarios, facilitates the organization, management and measurement of teaching processes, facilitates the management of material and human resources, reduces costs, allows optimizing times and favors the evaluation and better fulfillment of the student’s learning objectives.


REFERENCES

  1. Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Hölzer H, Lyman L, Smith C, et al. The association of standardized patient educators (ASPE) standards of best practice (SOBP). Adv Simul. 2017; 2 (1): 10.

  2. Dudley F, Silverman J. The simulated patient handbook: a comprehensive guide for facilitators and simulated patients. 4ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC. 2018.

  3. Wallace P. Coaching standardized patients: for use in the assessment of clinical competence. Springer Publishing Company. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2006.

  4. Heine N, Ferguson D. Management of Standardized Patient Programs. In: Palaganas JC, Maxworthy JC, Epps CA, Mancini MEB, editors. Defining Excellence in Simulation Programs. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. pp. 391-422.

  5. Newlin-Canzone ET, Scerbo MW, Gliva-McConvey G, Wallace AM. The cognitive demands of standardized patients: Understanding limitations in attention and working memory with the decoding of nonverbal behavior during improvisations. Simul Healthc. 2013; 8 (4): 207-214. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31828b419e.

  6. Wallace P. Following the threads of an innovation: the history of standardized patients in medical education. Caduceus. 1997; 13 (2): 5-28.

  7. Williams B, Song JJY. Are simulated patients effective in facilitating development of clinical competence for healthcare students? A scoping review. Adv Simul. 2016; 1 (1): 6. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0006-1.

  8. Tun JK, Alinier G, Tang J, Kneebone RL. Redefining simulation fidelity for healthcare education. Simul Gaming. 2015; 46 (2): 159-174.

  9. Rethans JJ, Gorter S, Bokken L, Morrison L. Unannounced standardised patients in real practice: A systematic literature review. Med Educ. 2007; 41 (6): 537-549. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02689.x.

  10. Issenberg SB, Mcgaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27 (1): 10-28.

  11. Pascucci RC, Weinstock PH, O’Connor BE, Fancy KM, Meyer EC. Integrating actors into a simulation program: a primer. Simul Healthc. 2014; 9 (2): 120-126. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182a3ded7.

  12. Cleland J, Abe K, Rethans JJ. The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 42. Med Teach. 2009; 31 (6): 477-486.

  13. Glassman PA, Luck J, O’Gara EM, Peabody JW. Using standardized patients to measure quality: evidence from the literature and a prospective study. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000; 26 (11): 644-653.

  14. Van der Vleuten CP, Swanson DB. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art. Teach Learn Medic: An Int J. 1990; 2 (2): 58-76.

  15. Madan AK, Caruso BA, Lopes JE, Gracely EJ. Comparison of simulated patient and didactic methods of teaching HIV risk assessment to medical residents. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15 (2): 114-119.

  16. Barrows HS. Training Standardized Patients to have physical findings. Chicago: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. 1999.

  17. Collins JP, Harden RM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 13: real patients, simulated patients and simulators in clinical examinations. Med Teach. 1998; 20 (6): 508-521.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Simulación Clínica. 2019;1