Rosete-Barajas LE, Flores-González JA

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 693-697
PDF size: 331.35 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Periodontal disease is the main factor of the loss of the dental organs, edentulism establishes morphological changes in the alveolar ridge, with the intention of restoring the function, phonetics, aesthetics and psychosocial factors of the patients, they have resorted to diverse techniques and previous surgical procedures for the reconstruction of the alveolar ridges. Objective: To know the use of the technique of reconstruction by means of Titanium Mesh, the safety of its use in the guided bone regeneration (ROG) procedure. Materials and Methods: Female patient with Severe Chronic Periodontitis Diagnosis, in which a ROG procedure was performed using a Titanium mesh; due to the loss of upper anterior dental organs and that requires vertical and horizontal augmentation of the pre-maxilla, under the following criteria: Inclusion: Having presented periodontal first phase treatment, having a good plaque control ‹25%, and being patient ASA I or II Exclusion: Do not maintain an ideal plaque control ‹25%, be a patient ASA III or IV, or have a chronic habit of smoking. Key words: Guided bone regeneration, bone grafts, pre-prosthetic surgery. Dental implants Results: After six months of regeneration, greater bone gain was obtained horizontally in the intervened area, the results and postoperative complications are discussed. Conclusion: The use of titanium mesh for bone regeneration of the jaws is a predictable technique of successful bone reconstruction of the jaws.

REFERENCES

1. Malchiodi L, Scarano A, Quaranta M, Piattelli A. Rigid fixation by means of titaniun mesh in edentulous ridge expansión for horizontal ridge augmentation in the maxilla. 1998; 13: 701-705.

2. Lizio G, Corinaldesi G, Marchetti C. Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh: A Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Factors Affecting Bone Augmentation. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29:1354–1363.

3. Her S, Kang T, Fien J. Titanium mesh as an alternative to a membrane for ridge augmentation, J Oral and Maxillofac Surg; 2012;70:803-810.

4. Boyne P, Cole M, Stringer D, Shafqat J. A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 43: 87-91.

5. Louis JP, Gutta R, Al Naief N, Bartolucci A. Reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible with particulate bone graft and titanium mesh for implant placement. 2008; 66: 235 – 245.

6. Chow K L, Cheung KL. The usefulness of stereomodels in maxilofacial surgical management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 2260 – 2268.

7. Brandt MT, Haug HR. The use of a polyurethane skull replica as a template for contouring titanium mesh. J Oral maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60: 337 -338.

8. Gutta R, Baker AR, Bartolucci AA, Louis JP. Barrier membranes used for ridges augmentation: Is there an optimal pore size. 2009; 67: 1218 – 1225.

9. Corinaldesi G, Pieri F, Sapigni L, Marchetti C. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants placed at the time of or after alveolar ridge augmentation with an autogenous mandibular bone graft and titaniun mesh: A 3 to 8 year retrospective study. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 1119 – 1128.

10. Misch C, Jensen O, Pikos M, Malmquist J. Vertical bone augmentation using recombinant bone morphogenetic protein, mineralized bone allograft and titanium mesh: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 202-207.

11. Shanti R., Yampoisky A., Miles M., Braidy H: Ultrasonic welded resorbable mesh (SonicWeld Rx System) in reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects: tecnical note and report of 2 cases. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2015. In press 1-9