medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 34

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2020; 9 (34)

Relationship between Academic Performance and Social Vulnerability in Students of Physiopathology

Sanguinetti JM, Pérez AR, Carolina RA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 36-42
PDF size: 542.60 Kb.


Key words:

Vulnerability, pathophysiology, academic performance, students, socioeconomical status.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: There are numerous factors that can influence their university performance.
Objective: The aim of the research was to evaluate the academic performance of students of physiopathology and its relationship with social vulnerability factors.
Method: An observational study and a descriptive statistical analysis were performed with summary and measures of association. The variables studied were: age, sex, province of origin, coexistence with their families, having children, working conditions, maximum educational level of parents, overcrowding, belonging to indigenous peoples, type of health insurance, type of secondary school where studied, activities in NGO, average of years in the University, having approved anatomy and number of times that they attended physiopathology.
Results: The final sample consisted of 275 surveys. The 72.73% (n = 200) of the students were from the province of Salta, 56% (n = 154) lived with their families, 5.45% (n = 15) had children and 26.9 % (n = 74) worked. Only 9 students lived in a critical situation of overcrowding and 6 students belonged to an indigenous community. In addition, almost a third of the sample carried out activities in NGOs. The 82.91% (n = 228) of the students had approved anatomy and physiology at the beginning of the physiopathology classes and 61.01% (n = 169) had attended one or more physiopathology courses. Finally, it was observed that 11.63% (n = 32) of the students presented social vulnerability.
Conclusions: Students with social vulnerability showed an insufficient academic performance compared to those who are not vulnerable. In addition, the social containment of the student, some activities and habits, their previous academic performance and having attended the subject classes more than once, are positively associated with their adequate academic performance.


REFERENCES

  1. Garbanzo Vargas GM. Factores asociados al rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios, una reflexión desde la calidad de la educación superior pública. Revista Educación [Internet]. 2007;31(1):43-63. Disponible en: https:// www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44031103

  2. Abeldaño R, Estario JC, Fernández R. Análisis y distribución espacial de la vulnerabilidad social en la provincia de Salta, Argentina. Rev. arg. salud públ. 2013;46-52.

  3. Fonseca G, García F. Permanencia y abandono de estudios en estudiantes universitarios: un análisis desde la teoría organizacional. Rev. educ. sup. 2016;45(179):25-392.

  4. Tamayo S, Berruezo S, López R, Sanguinetti JM, Vieta ME. Evaluación de los conocimientos básicos de los alumnos de Fisiopatología y su relación con factores sociales y académicos. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Salta. 2011;1(1):11-6.

  5. Garzón R, Rojas MO, del Riesgo L, Pinzón M, Salamanca AL. 2010) Factores que pueden influir en el rendimiento académico de estudiantes de Bioquímica que ingresan en el programa de Medicina de la Universidad del Rosario- Colombia. EDUC MED. 2010;13(2):85-96.

  6. Stewart S, Lim D, Kim J. Factors Influencing College Persistence for First-Time Students. J Develop Ed. 2015;38(3):12- 20.

  7. Sanguinetti JM, López R, Vieta ME, Berruezo S, Chagra S. Factores relacionados con el rendimiento académico en alumnos de fisiopatología. Inv Ed Med. 2013;2(8):177-82.

  8. Fundación para el Análisis y la Reflexión de la Argentina. Repitencia y diserción escolar [Internet]. Argetina: Carlos; [Consultado 12 enero 2019]. Disponible en: http://fundara. org.ar/2016/10/

  9. García ME, Bernardo Gutierrez AB, Tuero Herrero E, Cerezo Menéndez R, Núñez Pérez JC. El contexto sí importa: identificación de relaciones entre el abandono de titulación y variables contextuales. Eur. J. educ. psychol. 2016;9(2):79-883.

  10. Castejon J, Vera-Munoz M. A. Causal Model about the Individual and Contextual Determinates of Academic Achievement. High Sch. J. 1996;80(1):21-7.

  11. Collazo CAR, Hernández Rodríguez Y. Variables psicosociales y su relación con el desempeño académico de estudiantes de primer año de la Escuela Latinoamericana de Medicina. Rev. iberoam. educ. 2005;37(2):1-9.

  12. Salanova Soria M, Martínez Martínez IM, Bresó Esteve E, Llorens Gumbau S, Grau Gumbau R. Bienestar psicológico en estudiantes universitarios: facilitadores y obstaculizadores del desempeño académico. An. psicol. 2005;21(1):170-80.

  13. Feldman L, Goncalves L, Chacón-Puignau G, Zaragoza J, Bagés N, de Pablo Joan. Relaciones entre estrés académico, apoyo social, salud mental y rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios venezolanos. Univ. Psychol. 2008;7(3):739-51.

  14. Jara D, Velarde H, Gordillo G, Guerra G, León I, Arroyo C et al. Factores influyentes en el rendimiento académico de estudiantes del primer año de medicina. An Fac med. 2008;69(3):193-7.

  15. Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Stud. High. Educ. 2002;27(1):27-52.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2020;9