medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica

2019, Number 32

Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2019; 8 (32)

Myths in medical education: Why do we like them so much?

Sánchez MM

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 5-8
PDF size: 148.03 Kb.


Text Extraction

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Letrud K, Hernes S. Excavating the origins of the learning pyramid myths. Cogent Education. 2018 [citado 22 septiembre 2019]; 5(1):1518638. Disponible en: https://www. cogentoa.com/article/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1518638.

  2. Letrud K, Hernes S. The diffusion of the learning pyramid myths in academia: An exploratory study. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2016;48(3):291-302.

  3. People Matters Editorial Team. The myth of the Dale’s Cone of Learning. [citado 21 septiebre 2019]. Disponible en: https:// www.peoplematters.in/article/training-development/themyth- of-the-dales-cone-of-learning-17104.

  4. De Bruyckere P, Kirschner PA, Hulshof CD. Urban myths about learning and education. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press; 2015.

  5. Kirschner PA, Merriënboer JJG. Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist. 2013;48(3):169-83.

  6. Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R. Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2008;9(3):105-19.

  7. Papadatou-Pastou M, Gritzali M, Barrable A. The Learning Styles Educational Neuromyth: Lack of Agreement Between Teachers’ Judgments, Self-Assessment, and Students’ Intelligence. Frontiers in Education. 2018 [citado 22 septiembre 2019];3:105. Disponible en: https://www.frontiersin.org/ article/10.3389/feduc.2018.00105

  8. Kirschner P. Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education. 2017;106(1):166-71.

  9. Coffield F, Moseley D, Hall E, Ecclestone K. Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre. London, UK. 2004. pp 1-182.

  10. Riener C, Willingham D. The myth of learning styles. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 2010;42(5):32-5.

  11. Scott C. The Enduring Appeal of ‘Learning Styles’. Australian Journal of Education. 2010;54(1):5-17.

  12. Newton PM, Miah M. Evidence-Based Higher Education - Is the Learning Styles ‘Myth’ Important? Front Psychol. 2017;8:444. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444.

  13. May C. The Problem with Learning Styles. Scientific American. 2018 [citado 22 septiembre 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problemwith- learning-styles/

  14. Ganley C. Are boys better than girls at math? Scientific American, 2018 [citado 22 septiembre 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-boysbetter- than-girls-at-math/

  15. Halpern DF, Benbow CP, Geary DC, Gur RC, Hyde JS, Gernsbacher MA. The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007;8(1):1-51.

  16. Hyde JS, Fennema E, Lamon SJ. Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107(2):139-55.

  17. Niepel C, Stadler M, Greiff S. Seeing is believing: Gender diversity in STEM is related to mathematics self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2019;111(6):1119-30.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com