medigraphic.com
ISSN 2448-8747 (Print)
Publicación cuatrimestral editada por la Secretaría de Salud Jalisco

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Sal Jal 2020; 7 (1)

Incidencia de malformaciones congénitas en un Hospital General de Zona, de Irapuato Guanajuato, México

López-Tamanaja NL, Reyes-Berlanga M, Ríos-Ibarra LP, Gómez-Díaz GB, Reyes-Hernández MU, Santamaría-Arza C, Reyes-Hernández KL, Matos-Alviso LJ, Reyes-Gómez U, Quero-Hernández A, López-Cruz G, Cuevas-López LL

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 32-37
PDF size: 238.09 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the incidence of congenital malformations in newborns in a general hospital area. Material and methods: It is an observational, prospective, cross sectional and open, was held for five years. Malformations were classified according to criteria of Sprague-Opitz. Results: Of 16.658 births, 140 had an incidence of congenital malformations, that is 8.4 per 1000 live births. The mean age was 28 years among teenage mothers, there was a higher incidence of malformations of the nervous system. Cleft lip being the most frequent malformations, 85% of these patients had not received folic acid during pregnancy. The average weight of newborns was 3.096kg. there was a 11.46% incidence of chromosomal abnormalities being Down syndrome, trisomy 13 and 18 respectively the most frequent. Conclusion: From the results it is determined that the incidence is above the national average of birth defects, so it is necessary to investigate the effect of environment and / or prenatal care and to determine the etiology and establish programs to reduce their incidence.


REFERENCES

  1. Huff stadt AJC. Malformaciones congénitas. Vol. 4. Ed. Manual Moderno. 1981.

  2. Moore KI. Embriología clínica. 4ª Ed. Interamericana. 1989.

  3. Jiménez CG. Diagnostico de las malformaciones congénitas. Servicio de CirugíaPlástica del HU. Virgen Macarena de Sevilla. (Información personal).

  4. Ahued JR, Rash KJ Cartelazo ME, Arredondo JL, Márquez MF. Normas de Neonatología. Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. 1998.

  5. Normas de Neonatología. Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. México, 1999: 300-310.

  6. Figueroa LE, Cantú JM. El proceso de diagnostico en el paciente dismorfi co. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 1994; 5(11): 59-69.

  7. Spranger J, Opitz A. Errors of morphogenesis: concepts and terms. Recommendations of a international woprking group. J Pediatr 1982; 100(1): 160-5.

  8. Oritz AMR, Flores FG, Cardiel MLE, Luna RC. Frecuencia de malformaciones congénitas en el área de neonatología del Hospital General de México. Rev Mex Pediat 2003; 70(3): 128- 31.

  9. Vega VA, Vizzuet MA. Frecuencia de malformaciones congénitas en un hospital general de Tercer nivel. Rev Mex Pediatr 2005; 72(2): 70-3.

  10. Malformaciones congénitas. http://www.aepap.orga/faqpad/ faqpad-malfor.htm

  11. Prevención de malformaciones congénitas. http://www.cermi.es/ grafi cos/preven-mc.asp

  12. Genética y biomedicina molecular 2000 http://www.uanl.mx/ publicaciones/especiales/geneticaclinica.html

  13. Iglesias J. Van der Velde J, Rittler M, Dinerstein A, Spinelli S. Reconocimiento y manejo de malformaciones fetales. Rev Hosp Mat Inf Ramón Sarda 1997; 16(2):50-4

  14. Karter H, Warkany J. Congenital malformations. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 491-497.

  15. Reyes HM, Reyes HK, Gutiérrez CG, Reyes HD, Sandoval GTA. Control prenatal en el Primer nivel de atención. Rev Mex Atn Prim Sal 2015; 1(1): 19-23




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com