medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 29

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2019; 8 (29)

The novel Neuroscience Bachelor Program in the UNAM: lessons learned

García D, Álvarez E, González E, Guzmán D
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 3
Page: 104-109
PDF size: 398.96 Kb.


Key words:

Neuroscience, Bachelor program, Multidisciplinary, Professional development, Employment competency.

ABSTRACT

An innovative B.S. in Neuroscience was approved in 2016 by the National Autonomous University of Mexico, Faculty of Medicine, after 8 years of growing up programs and maturing administrative matters. This Neuroscience career gives students academic formation in disciplines of the brain worldwide with an integrative approach. Thus, B.S. in Neurosciences grows insights to learn about and investigate brain at multiple levels, from molecules to behavior with an interdisciplinary perspective, including two broad ways: preparation for on-going science-oriented programs in a standard research field to be engaged in, at a postgraduate stage, and development of skills and competencies that apply to a range of postgraduate areas, including health, diagnosis, clinical and behavioral therapy, cognitive and behavioral neuroscience and education. To do so, a variety of challenges were raised in the newly born neuroscience program leading to a wealth of experiences both academic and operative in several ways as expected and, to some extent, unexpectedly. Mayor concerns, however, arose from the students in emotional adaptive behavior to a new environment in a demanding program. On the other hand, teaching neuroscience, even by connoted scientists, was a matter of concern in bridging the gap from postgraduate to undergraduate programs with much scaffolding and divergences to work out. Finally, we gladly though no easily learned how every effort or arrangement might convey both, properly and accurately, to ensure progress in every neuroscience direction to really overcome difficulties. At present, we look for and follow improved ways in continuous feedback and evaluation of the instruments that are crucial in all educational process.


REFERENCES

  1. Holley K. The challenge of an interdisciplinary curriculum: A cultural analysis of a doctoral-degree program in neuroscience. Higher Education. 2009;58(2):241-55.

  2. Luna B, Garver KE, Urban TA, Lazar NA, Sweeney JA. Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child development. 2004;75(5):1357-72.

  3. Hamodi C, López Pastor VM, López Pastor AT. Medios, técnicas e instrumentos de evaluación formativa y compartida del aprendizaje en educación superior. Perfiles educativos. 2015;37(147):146-61.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2019;8