medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica

2019, Number 30

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2019; 8 (30)

Evaluation of surgical anatomy identification using ICT on surgical residents

Chávez SG, Hidalgo VC, Maldonado SJJ, Rodríguez ADM, Gersenowies SRA

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 41-49
PDF size: 839.58 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Traditionally the evaluation of the competences necessary for the execution of successful surgical procedures in residents of general surgery had centered on written exams. Even those attempts for measuring the aptitude to identify the surgical anatomy have been partial and subjective. To incorporate the use of TIC in the evaluations allows, by means of the simultaneous promotion of the digital literacy, to create a complementary evaluation that demonstrates the real degree of learning, without the need to expose the patient to unnecessary risks.
Objective: To propose a complementary evaluation to measure the capacity of the surgeon in training for the identification of the anatomical structures with surgical relevancy incorporating the use of TIC.
Method: An experimental trial was realized to 30 residents, from second to fourth year, of the general surgery residency program on surgical anatomy. It was compared a Group A with 15 residents to whom it was applied a written evaluation with questions of multiple option with a Group B of 15 residents to whom it was applied an evaluation based on a specialized software of anatomy (Essential Anatomy) within electronic tablets.
Results: The middle ages of the residents were 27 years (millennials), 67% corresponds to the masculine gender and 33 % to the feminine gender. The Groupe A obtain a global significantly minor qualification (X = 6.0333) in comparison with the one obtained by the Group B (X = 8.0467). It is due probably since the residents are more acquainted with the in vivo surgical own(proper) anatomy of the practical activities inside operating room, that with the surgical anatomy of the literature.
Conclusions: It is possible to use a complementary evaluation based on ICT, out of operating room and safe for the patient, to measure the ability to identify the surgical anatomy in residents of general surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Aggarwal R, et al. New Technologies for the Surgical Curriculum. World J Sur. 2008;32:213-6.

  2. Hidalgo R, Reece K, Santamaría M, Auz P. Tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TICs) y simuladores como herramientas de aprendizaje. Equinoccio Seri Acad. 2008; 5:172-96.

  3. Cooper AZ, Richards JB. Lectures for adult learners: Breaking old habits in graduate medical education. Am J Med. 2017;130(6):376-81.

  4. García H, Navarro L, López M, Rodríguez M. Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en salud y educación médica. Edum. [Internet] 2014 [Citado 25 Ene 2017];6(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_ar ttext&pid=S2077-28742014000100018

  5. Montesinos MR. Enseñanza de Cirugía Basada en Competencias en el Pregrado de Medicina. Rev Argent Cirug. 2013;104(2):77-85.

  6. Sugan K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for Its Modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:83-93.

  7. Smith FCT, Greenwood SR. Modern ways to enhance surgical teaching skills. Els Ltd Surg. 2012;30(9):471-6.

  8. Agámez S, Aldana M, Barreto V, Santana A, Caballero CV. Aplicación de nuevas tecnologías de la información en la enseñanza de la medicina. Sal Uninorte. 2009;25(1):150-71.

  9. Mahakalkar C, et al. Students´ Perception of the effectiveness of ICT use in improving teaching and learning in surgery. JHSE. 2014;1(1):1-8.

  10. Blurton C. New directions of ICT-use in education. UNESCO World Communication and Information Report 1999-2000. [Internet]. 1999 [Citado 2 May 2017]. Disponible en: http:// www.unesco.org/education/educprog/lwf/dl/edict.pdf

  11. Abdelaziz M, Samer S, Karam O, Abdelrahman A. Evaluation of E-learning program versus traditional lecture instruction for undergraduate nursing students in a faculty of nursing. Teach Learn nurs. 2011;6:50-8.

  12. Azer SA, Azer S. 3D Anatomy Models and Impact on Learning: A Review of the Quality of the Literature. H Prof Educ. 2016;2(2):80-98.

  13. Johnson E, Charchanti A, Troupis T. Modernization of an anatomy class: from conceptualization to implementation: a case for integrated multimodal-multidisciplinary teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;1:1-13.

  14. López B, Hinojosa E. Evaluación del aprendizaje. Alternativas y nuevos desarrollos. [Internet]. México: Editorial Trillas; 2000 [citado 2 Jun 2017]; Disponible en: http://redescolar.ilce. edu.mx/redescolar/biblioteca/articulos/htm/tecnicas_evalu. htm

  15. Quijano F. Origen y desarrollo de las residencias hospitalarias. Gac Med Mex. 1999;135(1):73-6.

  16. Academia Nacional de Medicina. La formación de médicos especialistas en México. Documento de Postura. México D.F., México. Ed. Intersistemas;2015. [citado 2 Jun 2017]. Disponible en: http://anmm.org.mx/publicaciones/CAnivANM150/ L30_ANM_Medicos_especialistas.pdf

  17. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Lineamiento Normativo General de Posgrado. [Emisión marzo 1998, actualizado julio 2002]. Disponible en: edumed.imss.gob.mx/Normatividad/ MarcoJuridico/.../LinGraPlaCurPost.doc

  18. Secretaría de Salud. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-001- SSA3-2012, Educación en salud. Para la organización y funcionamiento de residencias médicas. Diario Oficial. Estados Unidos Mexicanos; 2013. Disponible en: http://edumed.imss. gob.mx/pediatria/residentes/norma_funcionamiento_residencias. pdf

  19. Sandars J, Morrison C. What is the Next Generation? The Challenge for Future Medical Education. Medical Teacher. 2007;29(2-3):85-8.

  20. Veloz M, Almanza E, Uribe J, Díaz L, Quintana U, Alanís P. Uso de tecnología en información y comunicación por médicos residentes de ginecología y obstetricia. Inv Educ Med. 2012;1(4):183-9.

  21. Hartranft T, Yandle K, Graham T, Holden C, Chambers L. Evaluating Surgical Residents Quickly and Easily Against the Milestones Using Electronic Formative Feedback. Journ of Surg Educ. 2017;74(2):237-42.

  22. Yeh, D. Commentary for General Surgery Residents can be a Reliable Resource in the Evaluation of Residency Applications. Journ of Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):177.

  23. Eid J, Macedo F, Negussie E, Mittal V. Assessing surgical residents’ imaging interpretation skills. Am Jour of Surg. 2017;213(3):498-501.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com