medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Odontológica Mexicana Órgano Oficial de la Facultad de Odontología UNAM

ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2020; 24 (2)

Uncommon case report of maxillary sporadic odontogenic keratocyst

Franco-Barrera, María José1; Sosa-López, Vilma Paulette1; Franco-Barrera, Miguel2; Gutiérrez-Cortés, Evangelina1; Salas-Cordero, Kevin Onel3; Ramos-Ibarra, María Luisa4; Torres-Bugarin, Olivia3
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 52
Page: 134-140
PDF size: 237.05 Kb.


Key words:

Odontogenic keratocyst, maxillary keratocyst, asymptomatic keratocyst, bone lysis, enucleation.

ABSTRACT

The odontogenic keratocyst (OKCs) is a rare disease manifested in the maxillofacial region, mainly affecting the mandiblerather than maxilla and is associated with the presence of a retained tooth. Most cases are asymptomatic, affecting males than women in their second decade of life and patients may present pain or soft tissue swelling in infected OKCs. Bony expansion and paresthesia of the lips are reported in fewer cases. The most common region in the maxillae is the third molar and cuspid region. The objective of this report is to present an uncommon clinical case of a 72 years old male with asymptomatic OKCs in the left maxilla region, presenting with bone lysis in the vestibular and palatine region with nostril alloy without compromising the teethes. Patient was treated with enucleation and peripheral osteotomy using a rotary instrument, today day without recurrence. A simple review of cases with maxillary keratocyst was made too.



INTRODUCTION

According with the World Health Organization (WHO) odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs), earlier known as keratocystic odontogenic tumors, is defined as "benign uni- or multicystic, intraosseous tumor of odontogenic origin, with a characteristic lining of parakeratinized stratified, has slow growth at the beginning, but with potential for aggressive, infiltrative behavior".1-4 There has been cases reports of OKCs in other nonosseous locations,which involve the gingiva, but mucosal, epidermal and even intramuscular sites.3 OKCs presents as swelling with or without painand occasionally paresthesia of the lower lip3,4 The cyst may reabsorb bone and cause a secondary teeth displacement with consequent malocclusion. The current literature cites a broad range of recurrence (0-62%), with most recurrences presenting within 5 years on average after a surgical treatment, if not removed completely.3,5 It affects the mandible in a greater proportion than maxilla (60-75%). It is more common in the posterior ramus of the mandible, whereas in maxillae is in the third molar and cuspid region.3,4,6-8 The frequency varies from 11 to 21% and it can appear at any age (8-82 years), but shows predominance in patients between 20 and 40 years with higher male prevalence (1.6:1).3,4,6,8 It is one of the rare and distinctive developmental odontogenic cyst which from the dental lamina, it is named this way because keratin is produced by the cystic lining.4 A Cyst is an abnormal cavity, lined with 6 to 10 cell layer parakeratinized stratified squamous epithelium, and athin walled within the bone. It contains clear liquid or semi-liquid fluid with a cheesy material representing parakeratin produced by the luminal epithelium, mesenchymal and/or ectomesenchymal that are or were part of the odontogenesis process.4,6 Under the microscope OKCs exhibits a wavy, corrugated surface with a prominent, palisaded and hyperchromatic basal cell layer, with epithelium that has a flat interface with the adjacent connective tissue.4,6 Treatment with marsupialization "decom-pression or cystotomy" also results in the loss of classic features, with the lining becoming reminiscent of the normal adjacent mucosa. The epithelium may strip away from the connective tissue in these cysts, therefore close examination of the biopsy container for material is recommended.1,4,8,9 Treatment options range from a conservative approach to extensive surgery that include enucleation with cryotherapy, marsupialization, decompression and segmental resection.4,6,9



CLINICAL CASE

72 years old male was referred to the Facultad de Odontologia, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara for routine evaluation. On physical examination there was an asymptomatic patientwith preserved oral cavity, normochromic mucosa, and symmetric bone structure (Figure 1). Routine orthopantomography was requested and it demonstrated a radiolucent left maxilla region, molars and pre-molars (Figure 2). By to computed tomography (CT) with 3D reconstructionshe showedhypodense circular area (1.9 × 2.5 × 2.0 cm) with defined edges (Figure 3A) communicated with the nasal cavity, osteolysis in the palatine region and the anterior wall of the left maxilla (Figure 3B).

Treatment: the enucleation was done under local anesthesia with a combination of a peripheral osteotomy using the rotary instrument through a canine triangular mucoperiostic flap in the second molar of the left maxillary. Osteolysis was found in the palatal region communicated with the ipsilateral nostril, previously observed on the 3D reconstruction (Figure 1B). Removal was performed and a sample was placed in 10% formaldehyde for laboratory histopathology examination. This technique was used since the complete removal of the cyst possessed no risks of complications from a dental and/or anatomical point of view. Furthermore, this method facilitated the comprehensive analysis of the lesion including its clinical, histopathological, and radiological aspects.

Presumptive diagnosis: due to location, clinical characteristics, radiography, absence relation between the retained tooth and patient's age, it is set a presumptive diagnosis of Giant Cell Central Granuloma or OKC.

Definitive diagnosis: the histopathology reports a cavity without apparent content, thin odontogenic epithelium lining without projections towards its capsule and detached in most sections of its fibro-connective capsule. Flat stratified epithelium of 6 to 8 cell strata, hyperchromatic basal layer and para-keratinized surface were identified, with all these pathological features allow the diagnosis of OKC (Figure 4).1,6,7



DISCUSSION

The database patient records of the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara from June 2014 to November 2019 was reviewed. Recognition of 132 biopsies was found, two of them wereodontogenic cysts (2.3%), one dentigerous and oneradiquar. However, as it shown in Table 1, four articles were located in the review of works analyzing odontogenic cyst cases in Mexican population(tree carried out in Mexico City and one in San Luis Potosi City). Of the total Biopsies 9,673,of which 1,266 (13.1%) were diagnosed as odontogenic cysts and 306 cases (24.2%) were OKCs.10-13 In Mexican data base (Table 1), both percentage of odontogenic cysts (Table 2) and the slight preponderance of OKCs in menwere similar to those described in the literature.3,4,6,8 On the other hand, the percentage of OKC was different in the Mexican population (24.2%) than the other population, in which the percentage varies from 1.69 to 18.6%. It is mostly probable that the difference in the percentage of OKC between the review of the other population, Mexican and our database, could be due to the difference in years analyzed or the number of cases treated per year. Also, it could even be due to diagnostic methods, even if it is not described, it could have involved some genetic component, since the variability between one study and the another is quite wide (Table 1). Therefore, this represents a rare case, if the whole clinical picture is considered as a whole, since OKC according to the literature occurs at all ages with peak incidence in the 2nd and 4th decade of life, but is more frequent in the second decade of life,4 even in Mexican population.21 Nevertheless in our clinical case, the patient was 75 years old and the oldest person of the all cases we knowledge with OKC in the maxilla, further OKC in maxillary region are rare with a low frequency in the left region (Table 2),4,6,7 as Cadena-Anguiano described it in Mexican population study.14 However, the maxillary involvement owns a greater and increased threat, due to proximity to vital structures such as maxillary sinus, orbital floor, and infratemporal fossa.15 Medline, Google Scholar and Google search was performed using the MeSH term "keratocyst", combined with the word "maxilla" and "case report". We detected 32 cases of maxilla OKCs, includes our case (Table 2), and it is noted that 34.4% of all cases described were from India, 15.6% from Brazil and 9.4% (three cases, including ours) from Mexico. In these studies, 46.9% were in the left maxilla, 65.6% without pain, 43.7% without retention of dental organ and 53.1 % without bone lysis. Of the 32 cases, only 3 cases (9.4%) (Including ours) did not show any symptoms, however, they developed bone lysis (Table 2).

On the other hand, odontogenic cysts constitute a group of maxillary lesions, which cause their destruction and due to its aggressive potential, as well as its high recurrence rate, surgical treatment has been controversial challenge. The decision will depend on multiple factors, mainly anatomical location, size and compromised anatomical structures with the objective of eradicating the lesion and decrease complications as small as possible.16-18 Considering our patient OKC, it caused bone lysis in the mouth palatine region as well as communication with the nostril, conservative treatment decision was made, in order to avoid damage to the nostril, as well as the palatine region. Based on the fact that the OKC is a lesion that has a high recurrence rate3,4,6,8 and to reduce this risk, it was decided to perform peripheral osteotomy with a rotary instrument after enucleation in order to decrease the recurrence rate. After resection of the lesion, taking into account the OKC as a presumptive diagnosis, it is decided to carry out adjuvant therapy discarding the Carnoy solution and Cryotherapy to avoid damage to the soft tissues of the palatine region and nasal fossa, in addition a radiographic surveillance is established every 6 months, the first one (Figure 4) shows adequate bone healing and decreased defect, and no evidence of recurrence. The cause of recurrence is not entirely clear, but it is attributed to the thin and friable layer of connective tissue of the cyst which results in incomplete removal or the presence of satellite cysts.9,53



CONCLUSION

Although the OKC is an entity with a high recurrence, it should be considered that aggressive treatment is not advisable in all cases, due to factors such as commitment to anatomical structures and possible complications should be considered, however radiographic controls are advised periodically.


REFERENCES

  1. Soluk-Tekkesin M, Wright JM. The World Health Organization classification of odontogenic lesions: a summary of the changes of the 2017 (4th) edition. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2018; 34: 1-18.

  2. Oren N, Vaysberg A, Ginat DT. Updated WHO nomenclature of head and neck lesions and associated imaging findings. Insights Imaging. 2019; 16: 1-10.

  3. Witteveen ME, Flores IL, Karssemakers LH et al. Odontogenic keratocysts located in the buccal mucosa: a description of two cases and review of the literature. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2019; 19: 1-4.

  4. Passi D, Singhal D, Singh M et al. A Odontogenic keratocyst (okc) or keratocystic odontogenic tumor (kcot)-journey of okc from cyst to tumor to cyst again: comprehensive review With recent updates on who classification (2017). International Journal of Current Research. 2017; 9: 54080-54086.

  5. Kinard B, Hansen G, Newman M et al. How well do we manage the odontogenic keratocyst? A multicenter study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019; 127: 282-288.

  6. Rajendra Santosh AB. Odontogenic cysts. Dent Clin North Am. 2019; 64: 105-119.

  7. Pogrel MA. The keratocystic odontogenic tumor. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2013; 25: 21-30.

  8. Bilodeau EA, Collins BM. Odontogenic cysts and neoplasms. Surg Pathol Clin. 2016; 10: 177-222.

  9. Tabrizi R, Reza M, Jafarian M et al. Decompression or marsupialization; which conservative treatment is associated with low recurrence rate in keratocystic odontogenic tumors? A systematic review. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2019; 20: 145-151.

  10. Moctezuma GS, Magallanes E. Quistes odontogénicos. Estudio de 103 casos. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2009; 47: 493-496.

  11. Licéaga R, Trujillo J, Liceaga C et al. . Prevalencia de quistes cervicofacialesen el Hospital Juárez de México. Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2011; 78: 12-17.

  12. Mosqueda A, Irigoyen ME, Diaz MA et al. Odontogenic cysts. Analysis of 856 cases. Med Oral. 2002; 7: :89-96.

  13. Ledesma C, Hernández JC, Garcés M. Clinico-pathologic study of odontogenic cysts in a Mexican sample population. Arch Med Res. 2000; 31: 373-376.

  14. Cadena JL, Muñiz G, Tapia DC et al. Queratoquiste odontogénico. Revisión de 20 años en la Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Especialidades CMN "La Raza" IMSS 1980-2000. Rev Mexicana de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial. 2010; 6: 4-13.

  15. Maruthamuthu K, Vasupradha G, Dineshshankar J, Balaji AR. Recurrent keratocystic odontogenic tumor of right maxillary sinus involving the right infraorbital rim. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 8 (1): 70-74.

  16. Ecker J, Horst R, Koslovsky D. Current role of Carnoy's solution in treating keratocystic odontogenic tumors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74: 278-282.

  17. Singh M, Gupta KC. Surgical treatment of odontogenic keratocyst by enucleation. Contemp Clin Dent. 2010; 4: 263-267.

  18. Borghesi A, Nardi C, Giannitto C et al. Odontogenic keratocyst: imaging features of a benign lesion with an aggressive behavior. Insights Imaging. 2018; 9: 883-897.

  19. Das S, Das AK. A review of pediatric oral biopsies from a surgical pathology service in a dental school. Pediatr Dent. 1993; 15: 208-211.

  20. Hosgor H, Tokuc B, Kan B, Coskunses FM. Evaluation of biopsies of oral and maxillofacial lesions: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 45: 316-323.

  21. Sargolzaei S, Hassanzadeh M, Eshghyar N, et al. Odontogenic Cysts: A 10-Year Retrospective Study in an Iranian Population. J Dental School. 2016; 34: 147-156.

  22. Ha WN, Kelloway E, Dost F, Farah CS. A retrospective analysis of oral and maxillofacial pathology in an Australian paediatric population. Aust Dent J. 2014; 59: 221-225.

  23. Anchal B, Soham M, Chetana C et al. Odontogenic cysts and odontogenic tumors in a large rural area from India. A 10-year reflection. Med Pharm Rep. 2019; 92: 408-412.

  24. Kammer PV, Mello FW, Rivero ERC. Comparative analysis between developmental and inflammatory odontogenic cysts: retrospective study and literature review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 19: 6-8.

  25. Tanimoto Y, Miyawaki S, Imai M et al. Orthodontic treatment of a patient with an impacted maxillary second premolar and odontogenic keratocyst in the maxillary sinus. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 1077-1083.

  26. Amritha VS, Kannan V, Anupam K. Maxillary odontogenic keratocyst: a rare presentation in a paediatric patient. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2018; 17 (4): 01-03.

  27. Madhireddy MR, Prakash AJ, Mahanthi V, Chalapathi K. Large follicular odontogenic keratocyst affecting maxillary sinus mimicking dentigerous cyst in an 8-year-old boy: a case report and review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018; 11: 349-351.

  28. Hunter RB, Zaretsky LS, Nuovo M, April MM. Bilateral odontogenic keratocysts of the maxillary sinus. Am J Otolaryngol. 1996; 17: 269-271.

  29. Freitas D, Veloso D, Santos A, Freitas V. Maxillary odontogenic keratocyst: a clinical case report. Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2015; 63: 484-488.

  30. Silva GCC, Silva ECS, Gomez RS, Vieira TC. Odontogenic keratocyst in the maxillary sinus: report of two cases. Oral Oncology Extra. 2006; 42: 231-234.

  31. Veerasamy JSM, Raj LSM, Sankari SL, Krupaa RJ. Odontogenic keratocyst in right maxilla of 15-year old boy: a case report of not a rare lesion. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2015; 8: 47-52.

  32. Sheethal HS, Rao K, Umadevi HS. Odontogenic keratocyst arising in the maxillary sinus: a rare case report. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019; 23: 74-77.

  33. Mengji AK, Shankar-Yaga U, Besta R et al. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor involving the maxillary antrum with displacement of the third molar: a rare case report. J Ind Aca Oral Med Rad. 2014; 26: 335-337.

  34. Tamashiro, T, Mosqueda A. Queratoquiste odontogénico en posición dentígera. Caso clínico. Cir Ciruj. 2005; 73: 127-131.

  35. Hyuk K, Won L, Ji K et al. Odontogenic keratocyst associated with an ectopic tooth in the maxillary sinus-a report of two cases and a review of the literature. The Korean Journal of Pathology. 2011; 45: 5-10.

  36. Rivera J, Morón FJ, Jaimes BE. Tumor odontogénico queratoquístico en seno maxilar; reporte de un caso clínico. Rev ADM. 2017; 74: 46-50.

  37. Newaskar V, Verma M, Rajmohan S, Dashore D. KCOT occurring in bilateral maxillary sinus in non-syndromic patient. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10: 16-18.

  38. Absiand EG, Sim RL. Odontogenic keratocyst involving the maxillary sinus: report twocases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994; 23: 226-229.

  39. Al-Bodbaij MH, Ateyah A, Chopra R et al. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor in the maxillary sinus: a case report. Oral Health and Care. 2016; 1: 1-3.

  40. Cakur B, Miloglu O, Yolcu U, Göregen M, Gürsan N. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor invading the right maxillary sinus: a case report. J Oral Sci. 2008; 50: 345-349.

  41. Jafaripozve S, Allameh M, Khorasgani M, Jafaripozve.Keratocyst odonogenic tumor in the anterior of the maxilla: a case report and literature review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. 2013; 1: 90-92.

  42. Vencio EF, Mota A, de Melo Pinho C, Dias Filho AA. Odontogenic keratocyst in maxillary sinus with invasive behaviour. J Oral Pathol Med. 2006; 35: 249-251.

  43. Da Silva-Sampieri MB, Gonçales ES, Tieghi V et al. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor in the maxillary sinus: a rare occurrence. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 80: 178-179.

  44. Vázquez MD, Serrera ML, Alberdi J et al. Maxillary peripheral keratocystic odontogenic tumor. A clinical case report. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9: 67-71.

  45. Anekar J, Kumar KS, Nappalli D, John IE. Maxillary odontogenic keratocyst masquerading a periapical cyst. Int Healthcare Res J. 2018; 2: 133-137.

  46. Makowski GJ, McGuff S, Van Sickels JE.Squamous cell carcinoma in a maxillary odontogenic keratocyst. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59: 76-80.

  47. Perjuci F, Ademi R, Abdyli Y et al. Evaluation of spontaneous bone healing after enucleation of large residual cyst in maxilla without graft material utilization: case report. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018; 52: 53-60.

  48. Yamazaki M, Cheng J, Nomura T et al. Maxillary odontogenic keratocyst with respiratory epithelium: a case report. J Oral Pathol Med. 2003; 32: 496-498.

  49. Kamran FM, Mathur G, Rakesh D et al. Odontogenic keratocyst- an unusual clinical case presentation with review of literature. Saudi J Oral and Dental Research. 2017; 2 (9): 236-240.

  50. Byun JH, Kang YH, Choi MJ, Park BW. Expansile keratocystic odontogenic tumor in the maxilla: immunohistochemical studies and review of literature. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 39: 182-187.

  51. Gupta A, Rai B, Nair MA et al. MK. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor with impacted maxillary third molar involving the right maxillary antrum: an unusual case report. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22: 157-160.

  52. Vered M, Buchner A, Dayan D, Shteif M, Laurian A. Solid variant of odontogenic keratocyst. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004; 33: 125-128.



AFFILIATIONS

1 Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara.

2 Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara

3 Laboratorio de Evaluación de Genotóxicos, Departamento de Ciclo de Vida. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara.

4 Laboratorio de Toxicología Genética. Departamento. Salud pública, División de Ciencias Veterinarias, CUCBA, Universidad de Guadalajara.



Conflict of interest: None.

Declaration of patient consent: The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.



CORRESPONDENCE

Biol. Olivia Torres Bugarín, PhD. E-mail: oliviatorres@hotmail.com; olivia.torres@edu.uag.mx. ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4541-8067.




Received: March 2020. Accepted: October 2020.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 1
Table 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Odont Mex. 2020;24