medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2021, Number 01

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2021; 89 (01)

Survey on barriers in the practice of laparoscopic surgery in Gynecology and Obstetrics

Navarro-Martín JM, Pedraza-González LA

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 24-33
PDF size: 197.67 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To identify the challenges that prevent, on the one hand, the expansion of the practice of laparoscopy in gynecological surgery and, on the other hand, to evaluate if the various current academic programs of training of residents are assuming them.
Materials and Methods: Descriptive study, based on a survey to examine barriers in the practice of laparoscopic surgery in residents of Gynecology and Obstetrics. The survey was integrated with 11 questions and was applied among those who attended the XIV Encuentro Regional de Residentes, held within the framework of the XXIV Congreso Regional COMEGO 2019. Inclusion criteria: be a participant of the Meeting, answer all the questions of the survey and be part of a training program for residents. Exclusion criteria: not having answered correctly or completely the questions of the survey and not being a resident doctor in training.
Results:We collected 120 surveys with all the items correctly filled out of the 280 delivered (42.8% of the total). There were 92 surveys of public hospitals and 28 of private ones. 86.3% of those surveyed mention that laparoscopic surgery is essential in current practice. Up to 71.4% of the private and 53.3% of the public feel it is necessary to carry out a high specialty (1 year) as extra training. The main complication to perform laparoscopy in both was laparoscopic suturing, 42.8% private and 39.1% public: as well as the second complication being the image-eye-hand coordination 24.4% private and 31.5% public.
Conclusion: Barriers to the adoption of laparoscopic surgical techniques were identified in the various resident training programs. More and more physicians-in-training have a desire to improve their capabilities in minimally invasive surgical techniques.


REFERENCES

  1. Naveiro-Fuentes M, Rodríguez-Oliver A, González-Paredes T, Aguilar-Romero J. Effect of surgeon’s experience on complications from laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2018; 47 (2): 63-67. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.11.004.

  2. Zarhi J, Toso LJM, Cifuentes J, Vacca FG, Stuardo PA. Cirugía endoscópica ginecológica: experiencia de 8 años. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2004; 69 (4): 279-85. http://dx.doi. org/10.4067/S0717-75262004000400003.

  3. Campo R, Wattiez A, De Wilde RL, Molinas-Sanabria R. Training in laparoscopic surgery: from the lab to the OR. Zdrav Var 2012; 51: 285-98. doi. 10.2478/v10152-012-0032-x.

  4. Kotsis S, Chung K. Application of see one, do one, teach one concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (5): 1194-201. doi. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a0b3.

  5. Zendejas B, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery a systematic review. Ann Surg 2013; 257 (4): 586- 93. doi. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288c40b.

  6. Weizman N, Maurer RMA, Einarsson JI, Vitonis AF, Cohen SL. Survey on barriers to adoption of laparoscopic surgery. JSE 2015; 72 (5): 985-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jsurg.2015.04.001.

  7. Chen I, Bajzak K, Guo Y, et al. A National Survey of Endoscopic Practice Among Gynaecologists in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34(3):257-63. doi. 10.1016/S1701- 2163(16)35186-6.

  8. Luna-Ríos J, Rojas-Galvis MA, Cáceres-Ferro D, Cortés- Barré M, Ramírez-León JF, Camacho-García FJ. Desarrollo de un procedimiento quirúrgico aplicable como programa de entrenamiento en cirugía ginecológica laparoscópica mediante simulador. Rev Colomb Obstet Gine 2013; 64 (2): 107-14. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.117.

  9. De Win G, Everaerts W, Ridder DD, Peeraer G. Laparoscopy training in Belgium: results from a nationwide survey, in urology, gynecology, and general surgery residents. Adv Med Educ Pract 2015; 6: 55-63. https://doi.org/10.2147/ AMEP.S75747.

  10. Bharathan R, Setchell T, Miskry T, Aggarwal R. Gynecologic Endoscopy Skills Training and Assessment: Review. JMIG 2014; 21 (1): 28-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jmig.2013.07.016.

  11. Huirne JAF, Kennedy R, Stolzenberg JU, Brölmann HAM. What is the impact of surgical expertise and how to get it? Gynecol Surg 2008; 5: 265-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10397-008-0425-7.

  12. Ferreira Kikuchi C, Cordeiro Ruano JM, Mina Kati L, Sinhiti Noguti A, Bastista Castello Girao MJ. Assessment of laparoscopic skills of Gynecology and Obstetrics residents after a training program. Einstein 2016; 14 (4): 468-72. https:// doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082016ao3752.

  13. Torricelli F, Barbosa JABA, Marchini GS. Impact of laparoscopic surgery training laboratory on surgeon’s performance. WJGS 2016; 8 (11): 735-43. 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i11.735.

  14. Pérez-Muñoz A, Garzón-Martínez M, Pineda-Gómez AI, Miranda-Cruz AD, Villamizar-Gómez L. Competencias ad quiridas con simuladores en programas de entrenamiento en cirugía laparoscópica ginecológica: una revisión de revisiones. Educ Med 2019; 20 (5): 309-24. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.10.013

  15. Hur HC, Arden D, Dodge LE, Ricciotti HA. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: A surgical skills assessment tool in gynecology JSLS 2011; 15 (1): 21-26. doi. 10.4293/10868 0810X12924466009122

  16. Pintos B. Plan Único de Especializaciones Médicas (PUEM) En Ginecología y obstetricia. http://www.sidep.fmposgrado. unam.mx:8080/NoBorrar/recursos/programas/ ginecologia.pdf.

  17. Shore E, Lefebvre GG, Grantcharov TP. Gynecology resident laparoscopy training: present and future. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (3): 298-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ajog.2014.07.039.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com