medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica

2021, Number 37

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2021; 10 (37)

Competency-Based Medical Education in Times of COVID-19

Pérez-Cruz E

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 42-49
PDF size: 440.34 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: On January 30, 2020, the WHO declared the pandemic by COVID-19. The appearance of a new disease poses various challenges to society and medical education.
Objective: The aim of the study was to determine which are the ICTs and educational platforms used during the pandemic, and to analyze the compliance with entrustable professional activities (APROC).
Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study in students of Medicine Faculty of the UNAM, through the application of an anonymous survey divided into three sections: a) Knowledge of ICTs and educational platforms, b) Planning, development and evaluation of the subject and c) APROC development.
Results: 119 students, 60.5% female and 39.5% male. The average of virtual platforms used was 2.7 ± 1.1, the most common were Zoom, Google Classrooom and Edmodo. Access to up-to-date information, the ability to organize the time, and financial savings were described as strengths. Absence of clinical practice and not being able to establish a doctor-patient relationship as weaknesses. The problems detected were: lack of access or poor internet connection, overlapping class schedules and delay in the feedback of tasks or doubts. 67.2% had knowledge of the planning, development and evaluation of the subject. Of the APROC, 76.9% were in Q3, 15.4% in Q2 and 7.7% in Q1.
Conclusions: The ICTs used during the COVID-19 pandemic favor theoretical knowledge and the partial development of generic skills.


REFERENCES

  1. Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud. Actualización Epidemiológica: Nuevo coronavirus (COVID-19). 14 de febrero de 2020, Washington, D.C. [Internet] OPS/OMS; 2020 [citado: 4 Julio 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/sites/default/ files/2020-02/2020-feb-14-phe-actualizacion-epi-covid19. pdf

  2. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. Coalición Mundial para la educación COVID 19. 4 de junio de 2020. [Internet] UNESCO; 2020 [citado: 4 Julio 2020]. Disponible en: https://es.unesco.org/ covid19/globaleducationcoalition

  3. Hamui-Sutton A, Durán-Pérez VD, García-Téllez SE, Vives- Varela T, Millán-Hernández M, Gutiérrez-Barreto SE. Avances del Modelo Educativo para Desarrollar Actividades Profesionales Confiables (MEDAPROC). Educación Médica. 2018;19(5):294-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.edumed.2018.02.007

  4. Hamui-Sutton A, Varela-Ruiz M, Ortiz-Montalvo A, Torruco- García U. Modelo Educativo para Desarrollar Actividades Profesionales Confiables (MEDAPROC). Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2015;53(5):616-29. PMID: 26383812.

  5. Durán-Pérez VD. Esquema CARAIPER: una estrategia de enseñanza-aprendizaje del razonamiento clínico. Educación Médica. 2019;20(1):55-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.edumed.2017.03.016

  6. Kyaw BM, Saxena N, Posadzki P, Vseteckova J, Nikolaou CK, George PP, Divakar U, Masiello I, Kononowicz AA, Zary N, Tudor Car L. Virtual Reality for Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019:21(1):e12959. DOI: 10.2196/12959. PMID: 30668519; PMCID: 6362387

  7. Moran J, Briscoe G, Peglow S. Current Technology in Advancing Medical Education: Perspectives for Learning and Providing Care. Acad Psychiatry. 2018:42(6):796-9. DOI: 10.1007/s40596-018-0946-y

  8. Habibzadeh H, Rahmani A, Rahimi B, Rezai SA, Aghakhani N, Hosseinzadegan F. Comparative Study of Virtual and Traditional Teaching Methods on the Interpretation of Cardiac Dysrhythmia in Nursing Students. J Educ and Health Promot. 2019 Oct 24;8:202. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_34_19. PMID: 31807592; PMCID: PMC6852378.

  9. Alfalah SF, Falah JF, Alfalah T, Elfalah M, Muhaidat N, Falah O. A Comparative Study Between a Virtual Reality Heart Anatomy System and Traditional Medical Teaching Modalities. Virtual Reality, 2019:23(3):229-34.

  10. Mian A, Khan S. Medical Education During Pandemics: a UK Perspective. BMC Med, 2020:18(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1186/ s12916-020-01577-y

  11. Vergara de la Rosa E, Vergara Tam R, Alvarez Vargas M, Camacho Saavedra L, Galvez Olortegui J. Educación médica a distancia en tiempos de COVID-19. Educ Med Super. 2020:34(2).

  12. Estrada-Villafuerte P. Educación en tiempos de pandemia: COVID-19 y equidad en el aprendizaje. Observatorio de Innovación Educativa. [Internet] Tecnológico de Monterrey; 19 de marzo 2020 [citado: 2020 Julio 22]. Disponible en: https://observatorio.tec.mx/edu-news/educacion-entiempos- de-pandemia-covid19

  13. Rose S. Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020:323(21):2131-2. DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.5227

  14. Bravo López G, Jurado Ronquillo M, Tejera Concepción JF. La comunicación médico paciente desde el inicio del proceso de formación. Rev Cub Med Mil. 2019;48.

  15. Xavier M, Meneses J. Dropout in Online Higher Education: A Scoping Review from 2014 to 2018. Barcelona: eLearn Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya; 2020. DOI: 10.7238/uoc.dropout.factors.2020

  16. Salinas J. Cambios metodológicos con las TIC. Estrategias didácticas y entornos virtuales de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Bordón. 2004;56(3-4):469-81.

  17. Fasce E, Ortega J, Ibáñez P, Márquez C, Pérez C, Bustamante C, et al. Aspectos motivacionales involucrados en el aprendizaje autodirigido en estudiantes de medicina. Un enfoque cualitativo. Rev Méd Chile. 2016;144(5):664-70. DOI: 10.4067/S0034-98872016000500016

  18. Fincke F, Prediger S, Schick K, Fürstenberg S, Spychala N, Berberat PO, et al. Entrustable Professional Activities and Facets of Competence in a Simulated Workplace-Based Assessment for Advanced Medical Students. Med Teach. 2020 Sep;42(9):1019-26. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1779204. Epub 2020 Jun 24. PMID: 32579039

  19. Bramley A, McKenna L. Entrustable Professional Activities: Focus on Assessment Methods. Clinical Education for the Health Professions: Theory and Practice. 2020:1-13.

  20. Perkel JM. The Internet of Things comes to the lab. Nature. 2017;542(7639):125-6.

  21. Shilo S, Rossman H, Segal E. Axes of a Revolution: Challenges and Promises of Big Data in Healthcare. Nat Med. 2020;26(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0727-5

  22. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep Learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436-44. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539

  23. Ting DS, Liu Y, Burlina P, Xu X, Bressler NM, Wong TY. AI for Medical Imaging Goes Deep. Nat Med. 2018;24(5):539- 540. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0029-3




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com