2020, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev Elec Psic Izt 2020; 23 (4)
But you do consciously? equity in a conversational encounter between heterosexual couples
Alarcón DIL
Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1592-1611
PDF size: 174.71 Kb.
ABSTRACT
This paper analyzes fragments of the conversation between the
members of 3 heterosexual Mexican couples who consider
themselves tending towards equity. Their ages ranged from 30 to
34, and they had been married for 3 to 6 years. They were all
professionals. As a methodological strategy, phrases of a scale
were used to promote conversational exchange, which allowed us
to focus on language as a social practice, that is, in its pragmatic
dimension. Pragmatics refers to the ways of speaking, to knowing
how it is used in the interactions between speakers in everyday
life, through which it is possible to analyze how particular social
relationships are created between them. The findings show that the
pragmatic dimension of language allows to appreciate elements of
tension and agreement among the participants and that the sense
of belonging-dependence prevailed over that of autonomyindependence,
which speaks to us of the prevalence of the we, of
the construction of a relational identity as well as a balance of
power between them.
REFERENCES
Ashmore, M. y Reed, D. (2000) Innocence and nostalgia in conversation analysis: The dynamic relations of tape and transcript, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung /Forum: Qualitative Social Research, [On-line journal] 1(3) [45 paragraphs] Recuperado de http://qualitative-research.net/fqs-eng,htm
Bajtín, M. (2000) Yo también soy. (Fragmentos sobre el otro), Taurus, México
Bourdieu, P. (2000) La dominación masculina. (2ª. ed.) Barcelona: Anagrama.
Dreier, O. (2005) Trayectorias personales de participación a través de contextos de práctica social. En Pérez C.G., Alarcón D.I., Yoseff B.J. y Salguero, V.A. Psicología Cultural. Volumen 1. México: FES Iztacala UNAM.
Dryden, C. (1999) Being married, Doing gender. A critical analysis of gender relationships in marriage. London: Routledge.
Everts, E. (2003) Identifying a particular family humor style: A sociolinguistic discourse analysis, Humor, 16 (4) 369-412.
Galende, E. (2001) Sexo y Amor. Anhelos e incertidumbres de la intimidad actual. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Giddens, A. (2004) La transformación de la intimidad. Sexualidad, amor y erotismo en las sociedades modernas (4ª. ed.) Madrid: Cátedra.
Heller, A. (1978) El futuro de las relaciones entre los sexos, El viejo topo, 26, 9-15.
Lakoff, R. (1981) El Lenguaje y el Lugar de la Mujer. Barcelona: Hacer.
Lakoff, R. (1990) Talking Power. The politics of Language. USA: Harper Collins.
Le Breton, D. (1999) Las pasiones ordinarias. Antropología de las emociones. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Le Breton, D. (2006) El Silencio. Aproximaciones. Madrid: Sequitur.
Lipovetsky, G. (1999) La tercera mujer. Permanencia y Revolución de lo femenino. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation analysis. The study of talk-in-interaction. USA: Sage Publications.
Ricoeur, P. (1993) Amor y Justicia. Madrid: Caparrós editores.
Shweder, R. (1996) Quanta and Qualia: What is the “Object” of Ethnographic Method? En Jessor, R., Colby A. y R. Shweder Ethnography and Human Development. Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry.USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Tannen, D. (1991) ¡Yo no quise decir eso! México: Paidós.
Tannen, D. (1993) Gender and conversational interaction. USA: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, D. (1996) Género y Discurso. Barcelona: Paidós.
Tannen, D. (2008) La relatividad de las estrategias lingüísticas: repensando el poder y la solidaridad en el género y en la dominación. La manzana de la discordia, 3 (2) 91-105.
Full text