medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Biomédica

Centro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Biomed 2021; 32 (2)

Frequency of trauma by a Foreign body in rectum. Experience of 20 Years at the Hospital civil of Guadalajara

Bravo-Cuellar L, Medina-Padilla LA, Delgado-Sandoval C, Martini-Corona ED, Carrillo-Padilla C, Preciado-Hernández FS, Betancourt-Vicencio S, Bravo-Hernández A, Bravo-Cuellar A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 19
Page: 69-77
PDF size: 560.39 Kb.


Key words:

Trauma, Foreign body, Rectum.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The insertion of foreign bodies into the rectum is a frequent practice which could lead to proctological emergencies. The practice is not an emergency per se but could precipitate emergencies.
Objective. This paper aims to present more than two decades of experience related to the management of rectal foreign body injuries at the Thoraco-Abdominal Trauma Surgery Service of Civil Hospital Fray Antonio Alcalde of Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.
Materials and Methods. A cross sectional study on a period of 20 years (1999-2018) was carried out based on the data recorded in the hospital’s archives and included patients of both sexes with an age range between 15 and 91 years.
Results. There was a total of 194 patients (169 males and 25 females) with 75 cases (38 %) ranging between 30 and 44 years old. The incidence of foreign body induced rectal injuries was 4.0 ± 2.1 patients per year, between 1999 and 2018 and 15.4 ± 8.8 cases per year between 2011-2018. Proctorrhagia was the predominant sign (56 patients), followed by foreignbody sensation (49 patients) and abdominal pain (41 patients). Diagnosis was based mainly on digital rectal examination (100 %) and plain abdominal x-ray (94 %). Manual extraction was performed in 82 % of the cases, laparotomy in 10 cases (5 %) and colonoscopy in 5 cases (2.5 %). The main complications were mucosal tears in 50 cases (57 %), skin and mucosa tears in 12 cases (14 %), and perforation in 8 cases (9 %).
Conclusions. The frequency of foreign body related rectal injuries is increasing over the past years posing a real challenge for the surgeons due to the various complications and the distinct nature of their management and surgical repair. The on call surgeons must be familiarized with various treatment approaches form manual extraction, to endoscopic extraction, laparotomies and stoma formation. The complex nature of the surgical management and an increasing incidence of these injuries prompted the authors to share their experience on this topic.


REFERENCES

  1. Gentile M, Cestaro G, Di Filippo G, Amato B, Sivero L. Successful transanal removal of unusual foreign body self-inserted in the rectum A case report and review of literature. Annali italiani di chirurgia 2019 Oct;90:88-92. http://www.annaliitalianidichirurgia.com/

  2. Kurer MA, Davey C, Khan S, Chintapatla S. Colorectal foreign bodies: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2010 Sep;12:851-861. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02109.x

  3. Kokemohr P, Haeder L, Fromling FJ, Landwehr P, Jahne J. Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: a 10-year single-center experience. Innov Surg Sci 2017 May;2:89-95. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0021.

  4. Smile O. A glass tumbler in the rectum. JAMA 1919 May;72:1285. doi:10.1001/ jama.1919.26110180004008c

  5. Alan Lucerna D. Foreign body insertions: A review. Emergency Medicine. 2017 July;49 (7):315-319. doi:10.1001/jama.1919.26110180004008c

  6. Griffin R, , Mac Gwin G Jr. Sexual stimulation devicedrelated injuries J Sex Marital Ther 2009 Jun;35 (4):253- 261. doi: 10.1080/00926230902851249.

  7. Cologne KG, Ault GT. Rectal foreign bodies: what is the current standard? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2012 Dec;25 (4):214-218. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329392.

  8. Dahlberg M, Nordberg M, Pieniowski E, Bostrom L, Sandblom G, Hallqvist-Everhov A. Retained sex toys: an increasing and possibly preventable medical condition. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019 Jan;34 (1):181-183. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3125-4.

  9. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma 1990 Nov;30 (11):1427-1429. https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi ?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft& AN=00005373-000000000-00000

  10. Goldberg JE, Steele SR. Rectal foreign bodies. Surg Clin North Am 2010 Feb;90 (1):173-184. doi: 10.1016/j. suc.2009.10.004.

  11. Principe DR, Rubin J, Narbutis M, Cabrera J, Mitsiev I. Repeat presentation of large rectal foreign body requiring surgical intervention. J Surg Case Rep 2019 Apr; 2019(4):rjz121. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjz121

  12. Cawich SO, Thomas DA, Mohammed F, Bobb NJ, Williams D, Naraynsingh V. A Management Algorithm for Retained Rectal Foreign Bodies. Am J Mens Health 2017 May;11(3):684-692. doi: 10.1177/1557988316680929.

  13. Dae Ro Lim JCK, Taehyung Kim, Eung Jin Shin. Surgery for intra-abdominal abscess due to intestinal perforation caused by toothpic kingestion Two case reports Medicine 2019 Sep;98 (36):1-5. doi:10.1097/ MD.0000000000017032

  14. Sei H, Tomita T, Nakai K, et al. Rectal Foreign Body of Eggplant Treated Successfully by Endoscopic Transanal Removal. Case reports in gastroenterology 2018 Apr;12(1):189-193. doi: 10.1159/000488974

  15. Tavecchia M, Burgos Garcia A, de Maria Pallares P. Colorectal penetration by two intrauterine devices. Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas: Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva 2019 Apr;111(4):320-321. doi: 10.17235/ reed.2019.5974/2018

  16. Coskun A, Erkan N, Yakan S, Yildirim M, Cengiz F. Management of rectal foreign bodies. World J Emerg Surg 2013 Mar;8 (11):11. http://www.wjes.org/ content/8/1/11

  17. Cawich SO, Mohammed F, Spence R, Albert M, Naraynsingh V. Colonic Foreign Body Retrieval Using a Modified TAMIS Technique with Standard Instruments and Trocars. Case Rep Emerg Med 2015 Apr; 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/815616.

  18. Lake JP, Essani R, Petrone P, Kaiser AM, Asensio J, Beart RW, Jr. Management of retained colorectal foreign bodies: predictors of operative intervention. Dis Colon Rectum 2004 Oct ;47(10):1694-1698. doi: 10.1007/ s10350-004-0676-4.

  19. Cohen JS, Sackier JM. Management of colorectal foreign bodies. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1996 Oct;41(5):312-315. http://europepmc.org, PMID: 8908954




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Biomed. 2021;32