medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 26

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2018; 7 (26)

Ethics in research in medical education: Considerations and Current Challenges

Lara GYA, Pompa MM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 99-108
PDF size: 314.17 Kb.


Key words:

Ethical considerations, research in medical education, informed consent, ethical challenges.

ABSTRACT

Research is developed with the aim of uncovering new scientific information that helps broaden knowledge that benefits society. Therefore the significant preoccupation respect the ethical considerations in research. In this case we focus primarily in medical research associated with educational processes. The discussion about ethics and research has its origins in biomedical research after World War II as a response to a profound crisis of legitimacy of the scientific work. There have been several studies that involved humans as study subjects that had as a consequence the creation of international declarations and regulations in some countries in order to protect the subjects that participate in such researches. In this paper we address the ethical considerations that must be taken into account when developing research that is linked with medical education, its background, and some examples of studies that highlight some of the challenges that are faced today.


REFERENCES

  1. Meo A. Consentimiento informado, anonimato y confidencialidad en investigación social. Aposta Rev Ciencias Soc. 2010;(44):1–30.

  2. AMM. Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM - Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. 2013 p. 1–9.

  3. Miser W. Educational research - To IRB, or not to IRB? Fam Med. 2005;37(3):168–73.

  4. Cheng-Tek M. Deception and informed consent in social, behavioral, and educational research (SBER). Tzu Chi Med J [Internet]. 2012;24(4):218–22. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tcmj.2012.05.003

  5. Comision Nacional para la protección desujetos humanos de investigación biomédica y comportamental. Informe Belmont Principios y guías éticos para la protección de los sujetos humanos de investigación. Natl Institutes Heal. 2003;12.

  6. Millum J, Wendler D, Emanuel E. The 50th Anniversary of the Declaration of Helsinki. Jama [Internet]. 2013;310(20):1–2. Recuperado de: http:// jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/ jama.2013.281632

  7. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-012-SSA3-2012. 2012.

  8. García A. Aspectos éticos de la investigación en educación médica. Investig en Educ Medica. 2012;1(1):28–34.

  9. Opazo H. Ética en investigación: desde los codigos de conducta hacia la formación del sentido ético. Rev Iberoam sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación. 2011;9(2):61–78.

  10. González J, García J, Merndoza J, Uriega S. La importancia de la investigación en educación médica en México. Rev Médica del Hospital General de México [Internet]. 2010;73(1):48–56. Recuperado de: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/h-gral/hg- 2010/hg101j.pdf

  11. Orb A, Eisenhauer L, Wynaden D. Ethics in qualitative research. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2000;33(1):93–6.

  12. Peter E. The ethics in qualitative health research: special considerations. Ciência & saúde coletiva. 2015;

  13. Tai MCT. Deception and informed consent in social, behavioral, and educational research (SBER). Tzu Chi Med J [Internet]. 2012;24(4):218–22. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcmj.2012.05.003

  14. González Avila M. Aspectos éticos de la investigación cualitativa. Rev Iberoam Educ. 2002;29:85–103.

  15. Kvale S. Las entrevistas en Investigación Cualitativa. Morata. Madrid: Ediciones Morata, S.L.; 2011. 348 p.

  16. Meneses J, Rodríguez D. El cuestionario y la entrevista. Construcció d’instruments d’investigació en e-learning. 2011;5–31.

  17. Maraví RM. Contexto ético de la investigación social. Investig Educ. 2007;11(19):137–51.

  18. DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF. The qualitative research interview. Med Educ. 2006;40(4):314–21.

  19. Sullivan G. Education Research and Human Subject Protection: Crossing the IRB Quagmire. J Grad Med Educ [Internet]. 2011;3(1):1–4. Recuperado de: http://www.jgme.org/doi/abs/10.4300/ JGME-D-11-00004.1

  20. Sanderson L. Informed Consent in Educational Settings and the Novice Researcher. Kairaranga [Internet]. 2010;11(1):50–5. Recuperado de: http:// ezproxy.umsl.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost. com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ925408& site=ehost-live&scope=site

  21. Spatz E, Krumholz H, Moulton B. The new era of informed consent: Getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making. Jama [Internet]. 2016;315(19):6–7. Recuperado de: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.3070

  22. Grady C, Cummings S, Rowbotham M, Mcconnell M, Ashley E, Phil D, et al. Informed Consent. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(9):856–67.

  23. Pinçon M, Pinçon-Charlot M. La entrevista y sus condiciones específicas. Rev CS. 2012 Aug;(9):335–6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2018;7