medigraphic.com
ISSN 2594-1518 (Digital)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Impreso)

2026, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Cir Gen 2026; 48 (3)


Más allá del bisturí: armonizando expectativas clínicas y personales en reconstrucción mamaria en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México

Robledo MP, Uscanga MI

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 20
Paginas: 167-171
Archivo PDF: 1344.47 Kb.


RESUMEN

La reconstrucción mamaria postmastectomía representa un componente fundamental en el manejo integral de pacientes que se atienden en la Unidad de Tumores Mamarios del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), buscando la restauración de la imagen corporal y la mejora de la calidad de vida. Este artículo de revisión subraya la necesidad crítica de alinear las expectativas personales de las pacientes con los resultados clínicos alcanzables mediante la reconstrucción mamaria, con el fin de optimizar la satisfacción y el bienestar general. Se propone un enfoque metodológico que evalúe tanto los resultados clínicos objetivos como la satisfacción subjetiva de las pacientes a través de herramientas estandarizadas y validadas a nivel internacional. La comprensión profunda de las experiencias y expectativas de las pacientes atendidas en el INCAN es esencial para la mejora continua de los procesos de atención y fortalecer la relación médico-paciente en el ámbito de la reconstrucción mamaria.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Alvarez-Lozada LA, Salinas-Martínez AM, Peña-Arriaga MD, Valencia-Mercado D, Cordero-FrancoHF, Quiroga-Garza A. Meeting expectations and itsimpact on the quality of life following surgery in breastcancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2026; 52: 111421.doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111421.

  2. Kuhlefelt C, Repo JP, Jahkola T, Kauhanen S,Homsy P. Preoperative expectations and quality oflife after breast reconstruction: finnish validationof the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Expectationsmodule. Scand J Surg. 2026; 115: 218-225. doi:10.1177/14574969261428789.

  3. Marangi GF, Gratteri M, Mirra C, Cogliandro A, SavaniL, Ciarrocchi S, et al. The correlation between theimprovement in patient’s quality of life and surgeon’ssatisfaction following primary breast augmentation: aprospective study. Aesthet Surg J. 2023; 43: 741-747.doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad052.

  4. Khan S, Voytik M, Deguchi AN, Hornick MM,Broach RB, Rose JF. Assessing patient priorities andsatisfaction regarding aesthetic outcomes followingautologous breast reconstruction. Aesthetic PlastSurg. 2026; 50: 3925-3934. doi: 10.1007/s00266-026-05630-8.

  5. Feng Y, Zhang D, Liang F, Luo G, Du Z. [Perioperativemanagement of direct-to-implant-based breastreconstruction in breast cancer patients and WestChina Hospital experiences]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu ChongJian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025; 39: 1356-1362. doi:10.7507/1002-1892.202505006.

  6. Rocco N, Catanuto GF, Accardo G, Velotti N, ChiodiniP, Cinquini M, et al. Implants versus autologous tissueflaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 10: CD013821.doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013821.pub2.

  7. Tomita S, Nagai K, Matsunaga N, Kerckhove M, FujiiM, Terao Y. Detailed analysis of three major breastreconstructions using BREAST-Q responses from 1001patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2023; 43: NP888-NP897. doi:10.1093/asj/sjad205.

  8. Kandi LA, Hammond JB, Nadone H, Kosiorek HE,Rebecca AM, Casey WJ, et al. Patient perspectivesand quality of life after breast reconstruction andthe impact of subsequent revisions. Plast ReconstrSurg Glob Open. 2023; 11: e4885. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004885.

  9. Fontein DBY, Oros M, Held L, Giovanoli P, Pusic AL,Lindenblatt N. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Free-Flap Breast Reconstructive Surgery over Time (PROBREST).Breast Care (Basel). 2022; 17: 272-278. doi:

  10. 10.1159/000519804.10. Xu C, Lu P, Pfob A, Pusic AL, Hamill JB, Sidey-Gibbons C. Physical well-being recovery trajectoriesby reconstruction modality in women undergoingmastectomy and breast reconstruction: Significantpredictors and health-related quality of life outcomes.PLoS One. 2023; 18: e0289182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289182.

  11. Sadok N, Refaee MS, Eltahir Y, de Bock GH,van Veen MM, Werker PMN. Quality of life 9to 13 years after autologous or alloplastic breastreconstruction: which breast remains best? PlastReconstr Surg. 2023; 151: 467-476. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009899.

  12. Sadok N, Krabbe-Timmerman IS, Buisman NH,van Aalst VC, de Bock GH, Werker PMN. Shorttermquality of life after autologous compared withalloplastic breast reconstruction: a prospectivestudy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023; 152: 55S-68S. doi:10.1097/PRS.00000000000010496.

  13. Boudry T, Maisonnette Escot Y, Pluvy I, Feuvrier D,Houvenaeghel G, Ramanah R. [RECOMA study:Evaluation of quality of life and satisfaction afterimmediate or delayed breast reconstruction]. GynecolObstet Fertil Senol. 2024; 52: 517-523. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.006.

  14. Seki H, Watanabe N, Nagura N, Ogiya A, Shimo A,Uehiro N, et al. Impact of radiation therapy on breastsatisfaction and health-related quality of life after breastreconstruction: a multicenter cross-sectional controlledstudy (Reborn study-02). Breast Cancer. 2025; 32:1384-1393. doi: 10.1007/s12282-025-01765-9.

  15. Blok YL, Verduijn PS, Corion LUM, Visser JM, van derPol CC, et al. An analysis of complication rates andthe influence on patient satisfaction and cosmeticoutcomes following oncoplastic breast surgery. J PlastReconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022; 75: 4152-4159. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.088.

  16. Harvey KL, Johnson L, Sinai P, Mills N, White P,Holcombe C, et al. Patient-reported outcomes 3and 18 months after mastectomy and immediateprepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in theUK Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study. Br JSurg. 2025; 112: znaf032. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf032.

  17. Wojtkowska A, Zaborski D, Modrzejewski A, PastuchaM. The effect of cosmetic surgery on mental self-imageand life satisfaction in women undergoing breastaugmentation: An intermediate role of evaluating thesurgery as one of the most important life events. J PlastReconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022; 75: 1842-1848. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.018.

  18. Luong KP, Ter Stege MHP, Hummelink S, Zaal L, SlijperHP, Ulrich DJO. High quality of care delivery improvespatient satisfaction and quality of life outcomes afterbreast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2024; 44: NP686-NP694. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae126.

  19. Luong KP, Peters M, Slijper HP, Hummelink S, UlrichDJO. Patient-reported satisfaction and health-relatedquality of life in patients with breast augmentation: afollow-up of 6 months. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 154:299-309. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011029.

  20. Ozbey R, Cansel N, Firat C, Baydemir MB. Factorsaffecting patient satisfaction in breast reductionsurgeries: a retrospective clinical study. Aesthetic PlastSurg. 2021; 45: 2658-2664. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02354-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com