Chavarría M, Jiménez MJ, Negredo M, Bardallo L, Esteban S, Garcimartín P, Giraldo P, Molina L, Girvent M, Nolla J, Pérez J

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 16-24
PDF size: 434.03 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: WHO recommends interprofessional education (IPE) in which two or more students from different health professions learn together to work together in the future. In clinical simulation, students carry out health actions similar to reality but without any risk to the patient. Clinical simulation has been seen as a good method to promote IPE.
Objective: To implement a pilot IPE experience in clinical simulation with university students (medicine and nursing) and professional training (nursing assistant practitioner). In case of success, this method can be introduced into regular courses.
Method: Two multidisciplinary pilot experiences were carried out. Three clinical cases were designed where students from the three studies had to intervene. In each of the cases, a student of each of the three degrees assumed the first contact with the situation. In all cases, the four phases of the clinical simulation were followed and at the end of each experience, the students answered a satisfaction survey on their perception of learning, instructors, organizational aspects and general satisfaction.
Results: The pilot experiences were considered successful due to the positive perception of the teachers involvedad and the great satisfaction generated among the participating students.
Conclusions: Based on the success of these pilot tests, IPE has now been introduced into the regulated official curricula of medical and nursing programs where simulations are carried out with students of these careers and nursing assistants. The participation of non-university students is highlighted, which could stimulate similar experiences in health science studies.

REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: Department of Human Resources for Helth; 2010. [consul- tado 8 Feb 2021]. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/70185

2. Palaganas JC, Epps C, Raemer DB. A history of simulationenhanced interprofessional eduaction. J Interprof Care. 2014;8(2):110-15.

3. Dávila-Cevantes A.Simulación en Educación Médica. Inv Ed Med. 2014;3(10):100-5.

4. Walters C, Reedy G, Ross A, Morgan NJ, Handslip R, Jaye P. Does interprofessional simulation increaseselfefficacy: acomparativestudy. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e00547.

5. Chávez de la Rosa D, Tas Rosado JD, Villarreal Del Valle LI, Sandoval Bernal SD, González Mejía VZ. Simulación clínica y dimensiones de pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de medicina de una universidad privada. Inv Ed Med. 2020;9(36):70-7.

6. Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Interprofessional educational opportunities and medical students’ understanding of the collaborative care of patients. Analysis in Brief. 2014;14(10).

7. Amato D, Gómez-Clavel JF, Novales-Castro XJ. ¿Interdisciplinario o interprofesional?. Inv Ed Med. 2019;8(32):125-6.

8. Castello M, Prelack K, Fuller J, Huddleston SA, Doolin J. Student experiences of interprofessional simulation: Findings from a qualitative study. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(1):95-7.

9. Brashers V, Erickson JM, Blackhall L, Owen JA, Thomas SM, Conaway MR. Measuring the impact of clinically relevant interprofessional education on medical and nursing student competencies: a longitudinal mixed methods approach. J Interprof Care. 2016;30(4):448-57.

10. Wilcox J, Miller-Cribbs J, Kientz E, Carlson J, DeShea L. Impact of simulation on student attitudes about interprofessional collaboration. Clin Simul Nurs. 2017;13(8):390-7.

11. Jakobsen RB, Gran SF, Grimsmo B., Arntzen K, Fosse E, Hjortdahl P. Examining participant perceptions of an interprofessional simulation-based trauma team training for medical and nursing students. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(1):80-8.

12. González-Pascual JL, Cuesta-Rubio N, Sanz-Pozo B, González- Sanz P, López-Romero A, Muñoz-Balsa MJ, et al. Educación interprofesional a través de la atención domiciliaria: experiencia tras 2 años de implementación en los grados de Medicina y de Enfermería de la Universidad Europea de Madrid. Educ Med. 2019;20(1):2-7.

13. Aguilar-Ortega CO, Tovar-Luna B, Hernández-Cruz BA. Escenarios de aprendizaje basados en simulación: experiencia multidisciplinaria de la Universidad del Valle de México. FEM. 2018;21(4):195-200.

14. Brown DK, Wong AH, Ahmed RA. Evaluation of simulation debriefing methods with interprofessional learning. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(6):779-81.

15. García-Hudobro D, Skewes S, Barros X, Pizarro C, Gawinski BA. Learning together to work together: Interprofessional education for students in a primary care setting in Chile. Fam Med. 2013;45(4):272-5.

16. González-Pascual JL, Icaran E, Saiz-Navarro EM, Esteban- Gonzalo L, Cardenete-Reyes C, Beunza JL. (2018). Impact of the first interprofesional education undergraduate program in Spain. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(3):374-7.

17. Estrada-Gómez CG, Gutiérrez Camacho C, Salinas Sánchez I, Peñaloza Ochoa L. Conocimiento y percepción sobre fisioterapia y el trabajo interdisciplinario. Inv Ed Med. 2019;8(31):38-47.

18. Pumar-Méndez MJ, Canga-Armayor N, Díaz-Navarlaz MT, Wakefield, A. The potential advantages and disadvantages of introducing interprofesional education into the healthcare curricula in Spain. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(3):327-36.

19. Thistlethwaite, JE. Interprofessi onal education: implications and development for medical education. Educ Med. 2015;16(1):68-73.

20. Coll J, Bernabeu D, Cervantes C, Nolla M, Muniesa JM, Tor J, Zapico F, Pueyo N, Nebot, J. Un modelo de aprendizaje multiprofesional en ciencias de la salud: innovación docente como respuesta a las necesidades emergentes de nuestra sociedad. Educ Med. 2010;13(Suppl 1):S13-14.

21. La Rosa-Salas V, Arbea Moreno L, Vidaurreta Fernández M, Sola Juango L, Marcos Alvarez B, Rodríguez Díez C, et al. Educación interprofesional: una propuesta de la Universidad de Navarra. Educ Med. 2020;21(6):386-96.