medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 41

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2022; 11 (41)

Perception of the implementation of the Quizizz app in a virtual course of microbiology

Dextre-Vilchez SA, Vásquez-Mercado RP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 35-43
PDF size: 548.35 Kb.


Key words:

Quizizz, gamification, medical education, microbiology, virtual course.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In the context of the current pandemic, there was a need to implement virtual tools in medical education such as gamification. This is possible through the Quizizz app, which allows you to make didactic questionnaires in order to improve learning.
Objective: Determine the perception of the implementation of the Quizizz app in a virtual course of microbiology in medical students.
Method: Descriptive cross-sectional study. A virtual course in microbiology was conducted for medical students, divided into four chapters. At the end of each of the four chapters, the Quizizz app was used with 12 questions on the topic developed. In the last chapter, a questionnaire was applied to each participant individually with sociodemographic and academic questions and a final section on their perception of the implementation of the Quizizz app.
Results: A total of 89 individuals agreed to fill in the survey. They were from nine Latin American countries and 62.9% were female. Of the participants 78.7% had previous experience with this type of applications, 94.4% agreed with the implementation of the Quizizz app in subjects of the career and 96.6% believe that it helped them to mentally fix the contents of the course. In addition, they scored 8.5 out of 10 on their final experience with this app. Finally, in terms of the ratings obtained, the total accuracy of the four items was 47.2%.
Conclusions: From the result results obtained, we conclude that medical students are receptive to these types of applications. In spite of this, the desired level of success was not reached. Therefore, we recommend that it is important to consider whether its implementation is worth the investment of time and effort, or if it is only perceived as a leisure time.


REFERENCES

  1. Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, Liang W, Ou C, He J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708-20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002032

  2. Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities. How COVID-19 is Changing the World: A Statistical Perspective [consultado 15 Abr 2021]. Disponible en: http://hdl. handle.net/10986/33773

  3. Vera-Ponce VJ, Torres-Malca JR, Tello-Quispe EK, Orihuela- Manrique EJ, Cruz-Vargas JADL. Validación de escala de cambios en los estilos de vida durante el periodo de cuarentena en una población de estudiantes universitarios de Lima, Perú. Rev Fac Med Hum. 2020;20(4):614-23. doi:10.25176/RFMH.v20i4.3193

  4. Rose S. Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2131-2. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.5227

  5. Rodríguez Castro M. La educación médica en tiempos del COVID-19. RMH. 2020;31(3):143-7. doi:10.20453/rmh. v31i3.3802

  6. Ahmed H, Allaf M, Elghazaly H. COVID-19 and medical education. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(7):777-8. doi:10.1016/ S1473-3099(20)30226-7

  7. Tan D, Ganapathy M, Mehar Singh MK. Kahoot! It: Gamification in Higher Education. Pertanika J Soc Sci & Hum. 2018;26(1):565-82.

  8. Bryant Susan G., Correll Jennifer M., Clarke Brandy M. Fun With Pharmacology: Winning Students Over With Kahoot! Game-Based Learning. J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(5):320-320. doi:10.3928/01484834-20180420-15

  9. Fernández-Vega I, Santos-Juanes Jiménez J, Quirós LM. Uso de la app Kahoot para cuantificar el grado de atención del alumno en la asignatura de Anatomía Patológica en Medicina y evaluación de la experiencia. Educ Med. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.edumed.2020.01.004

  10. Felszeghy S, Pasonen-Seppänen S, Koskela A, Nieminen P, Härkönen K, Paldanius KMA, et al. Using online game-based platforms to improve student performance and engagement in histology teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):273. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1701-0

  11. Yapici İÜ. Gamification in Biology Teaching: A Sample of Kahoot Application. TOJQI. 2017;8(4):396-414. doi:10.17569/ tojqi.335956

  12. Basuki Y, Hidayati Y. Kahoot! or Quizizz: the Students’ Perspectives. EAI. 2019. doi: 10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285331

  13. Irby DM, Cooke M, O’Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):220-227. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88449

  14. Skochelak SE, Stack SJ. Creating the Medical Schools of the Future. Acad Med. 2017;92(1):16-9. doi:10.1097/ ACM.0000000000001160

  15. Failoc-Rojas VE, Quiñones-Laveriano DM. Enseñanza virtual de investigación médica en Perú: una alternativa de capacitación. ACIMED. 2015;26(2):201-3.

  16. Rahmawati S. Students’ Perceptions Toward Quizizz as an Online Learning Media. PANYONARA. 2021;3(1):62-70. doi:10.19105/panyonara.v3i1.4282

  17. Darmawan M, Daeni F, Listiaji P. The Use of Quizizz As An Online Assessment Aplication for Science Learning in The Pandemic Era. USEJ. 2020;9(3):144-150. doi:10.15294/ usej.v9i3.41541

  18. García N, Armada R. El financiamiento en las instituciones de educación superior: asignaciones gubernamentales vs autofinanciamiento. Cofin Habana. 2018;12(2):35-50.

  19. O’Connell A, Tomaselli PJ, Stobart-Gallagher M. Effective Use of Virtual Gamification During COVID-19 to Deliver the OB-GYN Core Curriculum in an Emergency Medicine Resident Conference. Cureus. 2020;12(6):e8397. doi:10.7759/ cureus.8397

  20. El Tantawi M, Sadaf S, AlHumaid J. Using gamification to develop academic writing skills in dental undergraduate students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22(1):15-22. doi:10.1111/ eje.12238

  21. Koivisto J-M, Multisilta J, Niemi H, Katajisto J, Eriksson E. Learning by playing: A cross-sectional descriptive study of nursing students’ experiences of learning clinical reasoning. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;45:22-8. doi: 10.1016/j. nedt.2016.06.009

  22. Verkuyl M, Romaniuk D, Atack L, Mastrilli P. Virtual Gaming Simulation for Nursing Education: An Experiment. Clin Simul Nurs. 2017;13(5):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j. ecns.2017.02.004

  23. Ortiz-Colón A-M, Jordán J, Agredal M, Ortiz-Colón A-M, Jordán J, Agredal M. Gamificación en educación: una panorámica sobre el estado de la cuestión. Educ Pesqui. 2018; 44:e173773. doi:10.1590/s1678-4634201844173773

  24. Orsini C, Evans P, Jerez O. How to encourage intrinsic motivation in the clinical teaching environment?: a systematic review from the self-determination theory. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015;12. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.8

  25. Cook DA, Artino AR. Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Med Educ. 2016;50(10):997-1014. doi: 10.1111/medu.13074

  26. van Roy R. Zaman B. Why Gamification Fails in Education and How to Make It Successful: Introducing Nine Gamification Heuristics Based on Self-Determination Theory. En: Ma M, Oikonomou A, editor. Serious Games and Edutainment Applications. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 485-509.

  27. Richard N. Landers, Kristina N. Bauer, Rachel C. Callan, Michael B. Armstrong. Psychological Theory and the Gamification of Learning. En: Reiners T, Wood L, editores. Gamification in Education and Business. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 165-86.

  28. Liu X, Wang L-C. Motivation, Learning Strategies, and Language Competency in a Technology Facilitated Chinese as a Second Language Classroom. CLTMT. 2017;1(2):1-8.

  29. Cueva MAL, Terrones SAC. Repercusiones de las clases virtuales en los estudiantes universitarios en el contexto de la cuarentena por COVID-19: El caso de la PUCP. Propós represent. 2020;8(3):e588. doi:10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE3.588

  30. González-García S, Casadelvalle Pérez I, Octavio Urda M, Fortún Sampayo T, Mezquía de Pedro N, Melón Rodríguez RG, et al. Un reto en tiempos de pandemia para la educación médica en Cuba. Educ Med Super. 2020;34(3):e2457.

  31. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Iii HLR. Comparative effects of testenhanced learning and self-explanation on long-term retention. Med Educ. 2013;47(7):674-82. doi:10.1111/medu.12141

  32. Jamil Z, Fatima SS, Saeed AA. Preclinical medical students’ perspective on technology enhanced assessment for learning. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68(6):898-903.

  33. Alsawaier RS. The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. Int J Inf L Tec. 2018;35(1):56-79. doi:10.1108/ IJILT-02-2017-0009

  34. Werbach K, Hunter D. For the Win: How Game Thinking can Revolutionize your Business. Pennsylvania: Wharton Digital Press; 2012. 148 p.

  35. Kalleny NK. Advantages of Kahoot! Game-based Formative Assessments along with Methods of Its Use and Application during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Various Live Learning Sessions. J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2020;8(4):175-85. doi: 10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_61_20

  36. Yuenyongviwat V, Bvonpanttarananon J. Using a Web-Based Quiz Game as a Tool to Summarize Essential Content in Medical School Classes: Retrospective Comparative Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2021;7(2):e22992. doi:10.2196/22992

  37. Van Gaalen AEJ, Brouwer J, Schönrock-Adema J, Bouwkamp- Timmer T, Jaarsma ADC, Georgiadis JR. Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26(2):683-711. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-10000-3




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2022;11