medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2023; 83 (2)

Ureteral stent insertion failure in obstructive uropathy secondary to cervical cancer

Cervantes-Miranda DE, Pallares-Méndez R, Villarreal-del-Bosque IS, Negreros-Osuna AA, Hernández-Aranda KL, De la Cruz-de la Cruz C, Gutiérrez-González A, Arrambide-Gutiérrez G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 18
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 261.89 Kb.


Key words:

Cervical Cancer, malignant ureteral obstruction, ureteral catheterization, acute kidney failure, pelvic neoplasms.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: To identify preoperative features that predict ureteral stent placement failure in women with obstructive uropathy secondary to cervical cancer.
Methods: Observational, descriptive, analytical study. Clinical registries of patients with diagnosis of obstructive uropathy secondary to cervical cancer were reviewed. Fifty-two patients attended between January 2017 to January 2021 were included. Diagnosis of obstructive uropathy consisted of hydronephrosis or hydroureter in imaging studies and elevation in baseline serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen with uremic syndrome. An analysis of variables of interest was carried out to assess the association with ureteral stent placement failure.
Results: We observed that the overall rate of failed ureteral stent placement was 55.8%. We did not find any differences in baseline characteristics between patients with successful or unsuccessful ureteral stent placement. A higher percentage of patients with failed urinary diversion on admission had a decrease in urinary output (58.6% vs. 30.4%, p=0.04), uremic syndrome (51.7% vs. 21.7%, p=0.02), as well as an increased median serum creatinine (6.6 vs. 2.6 mg/dL, p=0.03) compared to patients with successful ureteral stent placement. An admission serum creatinine cut-off value of 3.4 mg/dL yielded sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 65.2% for unsuccessful ureteral stent placement (AUC=0.674, 95% CI 0-52-0.82; p=0.03).
Conclusion: Our data suggest that distal ureteral obstruction evidenced by imaging, regardless of the extent of invasion, is the most important factor related to unsuccessful ureteral stent placement.


REFERENCES

  1. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, DennyLA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. RevisedFIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12749

  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL,Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence andmortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.214923.

  3. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I,Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancerstatistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int JCancer. 2021;149(4):778–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33588

  4. Burd EM. Human papillomavirus and cervicalcancer. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(1):1–17.doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.1.1-17.2003

  5. Chitale SV, Scott-Barrett S, Ho ETS, BurgessNA. The Management of Ureteric ObstructionSecondary to Malignant Pelvic Disease. ClinicalRadiology. 2002;57(12):1118–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2002.1114

  6. Ganatra AM, Loughlin KR. The Managementof Malignant Ureteral Obstruction Treatedwith Ureteral Stents. Journal of Urology.2005;174(6):2125–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000181807.56114.b7

  7. Goldfarb RA, Fan Y, Jarosek S, Elliott SP,University of Minnesota, USA. The burdenof chronic ureteral stenting in cervical cancersurvivors. Int braz j urol. 2017;43(1):104–11.doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.06678

  8. Guan P, Howell-Jones R, Li N, Bruni L, De SanjoséS, Franceschi S, et al. Human papillomavirustypes in 115,789 HPV-positive women: A metaanalysisfrom cervical infection to cancer. IntJ Cancer. 2012;131(10):2349–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.27485

  9. Humphreys BD, Soiffer RJ, Magee CC.Renal Failure Associated with Cancer and ItsTreatment: An Update. Journal of the AmericanSociety of Nephrology. 2005 Jan;16(1):151–61.doi: https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2004100843

  10. Matsuura H, Arase S, Hori Y. Ureteral stentsfor malignant extrinsic ureteral obstruction:outcomes and factors predicting stent failure.Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24(3):306–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1348-6

  11. Maguire PJ, Sobota A, Mulholland D, RyanJM, Gleeson N. Incidence, management,and sequelae of ureteric obstruction inwomen with cervical cancer. Support CareCancer. 2020;28(2):725–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04851-9

  12. McCullough TC, May NR, Metro MJ, GinsbergPC, Jaffe JS, Harkaway RC. Serum creatininepredicts success in retrograde ureteral stentplacement in patients with pelvic malignancies.Urology. 2008;72(2):370–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.068

  13. Pradhan TS, Duan H, Katsoulakis E, SalameG, Lee Y-C, Abulafia O. Hydronephrosis as aPrognostic Indicator of Survival in AdvancedCervix Cancer: International Journal ofGynecological Cancer. 2011;21(6):1091–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/igc.0b013e31821cabc8

  14. Radecka E, Magnusson M, Magnusson A.Survival time and period of catheterization inpatients treated with percutaneous nephrostomyfor urinary obstruction due to malignancy. ActaRadiol. 2006;47(3):328–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850500492092

  15. Song Y, Fei X, Song Y. PercutaneousNephrostomy Versus Indwelling Ureteral Stent inthe Management of Gynecological Malignancies:International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2012;22(4):697–702. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e318243b475

  16. Tan S, Tao Z, Bian X, Zhao Y, Wang N,Chen X, et al. Ureteral stent placement andpercutaneous nephrostomy in the managementof hydronephrosis secondary to cervical cancer.European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology andReproductive Biology. 2019;241:99–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.08.020

  17. Uthappa MC, Cowan NC. Retrograde orantegrade double-pigtail stent placementfor malignant ureteric obstruction? ClinRadiol. 2005;60(5):608–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2004.11.014

  18. Wang J-Y, Zhang H-L, Zhu Y, Qin X-J, Dai B,Ye D-W. Predicting the failure of retrogradeureteral stent insertion for managing malignantureteral obstruction in outpatients. OncologyLetters. 2016;11(1):879–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3961




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2023;83