medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 47

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2023; 12 (47)

Virtual learning modalities in Dentistry: Systematic review

Espinoza GA, Ramírez TMÁ, Villanueva VMC, Sánchez VA, Muñoz GSP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 98-110
PDF size: 553.51 Kb.


Key words:

virtual education dentistry, critical thinking, elearning, b-learning, m-learning.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Comprehensive dental training underwent an important transformation process as a result of the COVID-19 contingency. The so-called virtual environments (EVA), distance modalities and emergency remote education (ERE) had a great impact and effectiveness in education.
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of three virtual learning modalities (e-learning, b-learning and mlearning) in theoretical-practical knowledge and clinical practice in dentistry through a systematic review of the scientific literature using the PICO strategy in electronic databases.
Method: The study selection process was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was carried out by two members of the team during December 2021 in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Articles up to 10 years old are included, quantitative and qualitative, in English, with results of the evaluation of theoretical-practical knowledge and clinical practice and whose study population will result in dental students.
Results: A total of 422 studies were obtained, 12 met the inclusion criteria and worked with the e-learning and blearning modalities, of which five on e-learning and two on b-learning improved theoretical and practical knowledge, while that two on b-learning improved clinical practice. Articles that will evaluate the m-learning modality will not be added.
Conclusion: The e-learning modality was effective for the improvement of theoretical-clinical knowledge, while b-learning was more effective for the development of clinical practice.


REFERENCES

  1. Souza C, Matos L, Stein A, Rosario P, Magalhães C. Faceto-Face and Distance Education Modalities in the attainingof Health Care Peofessionals: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9:1557.

  2. Coordinación de Universidad Abierta Innovación Educativay Educación a Distancia. Glosario de modalidadeseducativas. Educación remota de emergencia [Internet].Ciudad de México: CUAIEED; 2020 [citado 31 mayo 2023].Disponible en: https://recrea.cuaieed.unam.mx/glosario/Educaci%C3%B3n_remota_de_emergencia.

  3. Coordinación de Universidad Abierta Innovación Educativay Educación a Distancia. Presentación [Internet]. Ciudad deMéxico: CUAIEED; 2020 [citado 31 mayo 2023]. Disponibleen: https://avi.cuaieed.unam.mx/

  4. Quesada A. Aprendizaje colaborativo en entornos virtuales:los recursos de la Web 2.0. Revista de Lenguas Modernas.2013;1(18):337-350. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rlm/article/view/12370

  5. Fernández-Pampillón C. Las plataformas e-learning para laenseñanza y el aprendizaje universitario en internet. UniversidadComplutense de Madrid. En: Las plataformas deaprendizaje. Del mito a la realidad 2019.

  6. Santos C, Pimenta C, Nobre M. The PICO strategy for theresearch question construction and evidence search. RevistaLatino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2007;15(3):508-511.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023

  7. Urrútia G, Bonfill X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuestapara mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas ymetaanálisis. Medicina Clínica. 2010;35(11):507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015

  8. Rocha B, Rosa B, Cerqueira T, de-Azevedo-Vaz S, Barbosa G,Ferreira L, Verner F, Visconti M. Evaluation of different teachingmethods in the radiographic diagnosis of proximal carious lesions.Dento maxillo facial radiology. 2021;50(4):20200295.https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200295

  9. Koth A, Focken A, Lyden E, Yoachim S. Effectiveness ofan E-module at teaching novice learners critical thinkingskills related to dentistry. Journal of dental education.2021;10.1002/jdd.12757. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12757

  10. Morgado M, Mendes J, Proença L. Online Problem-BasedLearning in Clinical Dental Education: Students’ Self-Perceptionand Motivation. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland).2021;9(4):420. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9040420

  11. Farah-Franco S, Hasel R, Tahir A, Chui B, Ywom J, YoungB, Singh M, Turchi S, Pape G, Henson B. A preclinical hybridcurriculum and its impact on dental student learningoutcomes. Journal of dental education. 2021;85(5):679-689.https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12517

  12. Mardani M, Cheraghian S, Naeeni S, Zarifsanaiey N. Effectivenessof virtual patients in teaching clinical decisionmakingskills to dental students. Journal of dental education.2020;84(5):615-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12045

  13. Seki N, Moross J, Otsuka H, Sunaga M, Naito M, Kondo K,Shinada K, Morio I, Kinoshita A. Dental Hygiene LearningOutcomes Obtained Through Computer-Assisted SimulationModules. Journal of dental higiene. 2020;94(1):32-38.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32127427/

  14. Soltanimehr E, Bahrampour E, Imani M, Rahimi F, AlmasiB, Moattari M. Effect of virtual versus traditional educationon theoretical knowledge and reporting skills of dentalstudents in radiographic interpretation of bony lesions ofthe jaw. BMC medical education. 2019;19(1):233. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1649-0

  15. Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar M, Jahedi F, MoattariM. Comparing two methods of education (virtual versustraditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a posttestonly design study. BMC medical education. 2014;14:45.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-45

  16. Ariana A, Amin M, Pakneshan S, Dolan-Evans E, Lam A.Integration of Traditional and E-Learning Methods to ImproveLearning Outcomes for Dental Students in Histopathology.Journal of dental education. 2016;80(9):1140-1148.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27587581/

  17. Nijakowski K, Lehmann A, Zdrojewski J, Nowak M, SurdackaA. The Effectiveness of the Blended Learning in ConservativeDentistry with Endodontics on the Basis of theSurvey among 4th-Year Students during the COVID-19Pandemic. International journal of environmental researchand public health. 2021;18(9):4555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094555

  18. Rafai N, Lemos M, Kennes L, Hawari A, Gerhardt-Szép S,Classen-Linke I. Anatomy meets dentistry! Linking anatomyand clinical practice in the preclinical dental curriculum.BMC medical education. 2016;16(1):305. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0825-8

  19. Maresca C, Barrero C, Duggan D, Platin E, Rivera E, HannumW, Petrola F. Utilization of blended learning to teach preclinicalendodontics. Journal of dental education. 2014;78(8):1194-1204. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25086153/

  20. Quinn B, Field J, Gorter R, Akota I, Manzanares M, PaganellC, Davies J, Dixon J, Gabor G, Amaral Mendes R, Hahn P,Vital S, O’Brien J, Murphy D, Tubert-Jeannin S. COVID-19:The immediate response of european academic dental institutionsand future implications for dental education. Europeanjournal of dental education: official journal of theAssociation for Dental Education in Europe. 2020;24(4):811.

  21. Sarwar H, Akhtar H, Naeem M, Khan J, Waraich K, ShabbirS, Hasan A, Khurshid Z. Self-Reported Effectiveness ofe-Learning Classes during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nation-Wide Survey of Pakistani Undergraduate DentistryStudents. European journal of dentistry. 2020;14(S01):S34-S43. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1717000814. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12542

  22. Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended LearningCompared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education:Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal ofmedical Internet research. 2020;22(8):e16504. https://doi.org/10.2196/16504

  23. Coyne E, Rands H, Frommolt V, Kain V, Plugge M, MitchellM. Investigation of blended learning video resources toteach health students clinical skills: An integrative review.Nurse Educ Toda. 2018;63:101-107. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29425738/

  24. Alqahtani A, Rajkhan A. E-Learning Critical Success Factorsduring the COVID-19 Pandemic: A ComprehensiveAnalysis of E-Learning Managerial Perspectives. EducationScience. 2016;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216

  25. Botelho M, Agrawal, Bornstein M. An systematic reviewof e-learning outcomes in undergraduate dental radiologycurricula-levels of learning and implications for researchersand curriculum planners. Dento maxillo facial radiology.2019;48(1):20180027. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180027

  26. Elcullada R, Galang A, Hallar B. The Impact and Effectivenessof E Learning on Teaching and Learning. InternationalJournal Of Computing Sciences Research. 2020;5:383-397.stepacademic.net/ijcsr/article/view/145

  27. Perez L. Orígenes y transformaciones del aprendizaje en línea(E-learning). Innovaciones educativas mediadas por paradigmastecnológicos. Revista Historia de la Educación Colombiana.2020;24(24):105-132. https://doi.org/10.22267/rhec.202424.74




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2023;12