2017, Number 21
<< Back Next >>
Inv Ed Med 2017; 6 (21)
Magnitude of differences: Reanalysis of effects of treatment
Merino-Soto C, Angulo-Ramos M
Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 63-64
PDF size: 142.55 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Fernández-Ayuso D, Campo-Cazallas C, Fernández-Ayuso R.Aprendizaje en entornos de simulación de alta fidelidad: evaluacióndel estrés en estudiantes de enfermería. Ed Med. 2016;17:25---8.
Seidel JA, Miller SD, Chow DL. Effect size calculationsfor the clinician: Methods and comparability. Psychot Res.2013;24:470---84.
Gliner JA, Leech NL, Morgan GA. Significance testing (NHST):what do the textbooks say? J Exp Edu. 2002;71:83---92.
Merino C. Carta editorial. Avances en Psic Latin. 2011;29:7---10, 2011. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci arttext&pid=S1794-47242011000200001
Sterne JAC, Smith GD. Sifting the evidence----what’s wrong withsignificance test. BMJ. 2001;322:226---31.
Cumming G. Understanding the new statistics: effect sizes,confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge;2012.
Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time:Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis.1987;40:171---8.
Katz J, Larson M, Phillips CH, Fossel A, Liang M. Comparativemeasurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments.Med Care. 1992;30:917---25.
Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five healthstatus instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care.1990;28:632---42.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.2.nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological bulletin. 1992;112:155---9.
Full text