González-Hernández RG, Pérez-Martínez E, Sánchez-Tame A

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 2289-2292
PDF size: 444.93 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The double scanning technique was originally described in 2019 by Panos Papaspyridakos as a method for the planning and fabricating full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis in patients who already had a transitional prosthesis. Objective. To evaluate the double digital scanning technique as an alternative method for taking impression of an implantsupported prosthesis. Case report. Female patient, referred to the oral rehabilitation postgraduate program for the fabrication of a prosthesis on five implants. The double scanning technique was carried out to obtain new design prototypes and a passivity in the testing with stereolithography to verify that the impression was adequate. Results. Passivity was obtained and the approval of a new design for the prosthesis was given by the patient. Also, the prosthetically driven planification of the implants was done. A milled polymethylmethacryl (PMME) transitional prosthesis and new provisionals for the lower teeth were delivered. Conclusions. The double scanning technique is a good alternative to streamline the workflow for the fabrication of full-arch fixed implant-supported prothesis.

REFERENCES

1. 1 Papaspyridakos P, Chen YW, Gonzalez-Gusmao I, Att W.Complete digital workflow in prosthesis prototype fabricationfor complete-arch implant rehabilitation: A technique. J ProsthetDent. 2019; 122(3): 189-92.

2. Resnik RR. Misch’s Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 4ª ed.ELSEVIER. 2020.

3. Papaspyridakos P, AlFulaij F, Bokhary A, Sallustio A, ChochlidakisK. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis PrototypeFabrication with Double Digital Scanning: Accuracy of FitAssessment. J Prosthodont. 2023; 32(1): 49-53.

4. Gomez-Meda R, Esquivel J. Perio-prosthodontic pontic sitemanagement, part I: Pontic designs and their current applications.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 35(4): 609-20.

5. Kim RJY, Park JM, Shim JS. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scannersfor complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitativeevaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120(6): 895-903.

6. Zhang YJ, Shi J, Qian S, Qiao SC, Lai HC. Accuracy offull arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoralscanners and related variables: A systematic review[Internet]. 2021. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351731193

7. Revell G, Simon B, Mennito A, Evans ZP, Renne W, LudlowM, et al. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operatorexperience. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128(4): 632-8.

8. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fitin implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent. 2001;10(2): 85-92.