medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2026; 24 (2)

Perforated duodenal diverticulum treated conservatively

Romero MRD, Reyna DPI, Astudillo GF, Verde MMA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/122617

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/122617
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/122617

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 135-138
PDF size: 1129.25 Kb.


Key words:

abdominal pain, duodenal diverticulum, perforated duodenal diverticula, perforated diverticulum, parenteral nutrition.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: duodenal diverticula are common conditions; however, perforation is a rare occurrence. Accuracy is required for its diagnosis because it is not the first suspicion in the face of abdominal pain and is often confused with other differential entities. Although there are few reported cases of conservative treatment, as some patients can use it, several reports have shown satisfactory results. However, it is necessary to maintain close monitoring, and surgical procedures should always be considered. We describe the case of a patient diagnosed with a perforated duodenal diverticulum who received conservative treatment, which evolved satisfactorily. Case presentation: a 50-year-old patient with a history of systemic arterial hypertension, transient ischemic attack, and gastroesophageal reflux disease was admitted to the emergency department secondary to severe abdominal pain, postural discomfort, abdominal distension, and a CT scan diagnosis of duodenal perforation. He was hemodynamically stable. A new imaging study with oral contrast was performed due to the lack of a previous study, reporting perforation of the duodenal diverticulum with no contrast medium leak. Conservative treatment was decided upon, with an adequate outcome four months after the event described. Conclusion: conservative treatment is effective for initially treating patients without complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Schroeder TC, Hartman M, Heller M, Klepchick P, Ilkhanipour K.Duodenal diverticula: potential complications and common imagingpitfalls. Clin Radiol. 2014; 69 (10): 1072-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.05.103.

  2. Motta-Ramírez GA, Ortiz-León JL, Urbina De la Vega F, Mejía-NogalesRE, Barinagarrenteria-Aldatz R. La enfermedad diverticular duodenalcomo hallazgo incidental detectado por tomografía computarizada.Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2010; 75 (2): 165-70.

  3. Kapp JR, Müller PC, Gertsch P, Gubler C, Clavien PA, Lehmann K.A systematic review of the perforated duodenal diverticula: lessonslearned from the last decade. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407 (1):25-35. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02238-1.

  4. Thorson CM, Paz Ruiz PS, Roeder RA, Sleeman D, Casillas VJ. Theperforated duodenal diverticulum. Arch Surg. 2012; 147 (1): 81-88.doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.821.

  5. Banal C, Stevens C. Perforated duodenal diverticulum treatedconservatively. BMJ Case Rep. 2024; 17(8): e259643.

  6. Sasaki Y, Nakahodo J, Onishi T, Tachibana A, Minami R, Noma E et al.Duodenal diverticular perforation treated conservatively: reassessingindications for treatment. Intern Med. 2023; 62 (22): 3327-3331.doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1211-22.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2026;24