2026, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Cir Card Mex 2026; 11 (2)
PARTNER 3 at 7 years: temporal heterogeneity, endpoint architecture, and the limits of long-term equivalence
García-Villarreal OA
Language: English
References: 13
Page: 54-58
PDF size: 551.11 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The 7-year follow-up of the PARTNER 3 trial provides the most
robust randomized evidence comparing balloon-expandable
transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical
aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic
stenosis at low surgical risk. Although early analyses demonstrated
noninferiority of TAVI, longer-term data reveal temporal
heterogeneity of treatment effects, nonproportional hazards,
and interpretative dependence on composite endpoint structure.
While the primary non-hierarchical composite endpoint shows
no statistically significant difference at seven years, all-cause
mortality is numerically higher in the TAVI group (19.5 vs. 16.8%).
Hazard ratios converge and appear to invert beyond the first year,
and restricted mean survival time analyses integrate early benefit
with late-phase attenuation. This Point of View examines the
methodological and temporal architecture of the 7-year analysis and
discusses its implications for durability assessment and long-term
decision-making in low-risk patients with extended life expectancy.
REFERENCES
ClinicalTrials.gov. PARTNER 3 trial: safety and effectiveness of theSAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in low risk patients with aorticstenosis (P3) [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine(US); 2026. Available in: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02675114
Leon MB, Mack MJ, Pibarot P, et al; PARTNER 3 Investigators.Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patientsat 7 years. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(8):773-783. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2509766.
Domb BG, Sabetian PW. The blight of the type ii error: when nodifference does not mean no difference. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(4):1353-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.057.
Bowers D. Medical statistics from scratch: An introduction for healthprofessionals. 4th ed. Nashville, TN: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
McCoy CE. Understanding the use of composite endpoints inclinical trials. West J Emerg Med. 2018;19(4):631-634. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.4.38383.
Han K, Jung I. Restricted mean survival time for survival analysis: aquick guide for clinical researchers. Korean J Radiol. 2022;23(5):495-499. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0061.
Faizi N, Alvi Y. Survival analysis. In: Faizi N, Alvi Y, editors. Biostatisticsmanual for health research. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2023. p. 195-211.
Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al; Writing CommitteeMembers. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patientswith valvular heart disease: a report of the American College ofCardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on ClinicalPractice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(4):e25-e197. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018.
Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, et al; VARC-3 Writing Committee.Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitionsfor aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(19):1825-1857.doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
García-Villarreal OA. Reoperation rate versus failure rate asquality indicators in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitralregurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2024;231:70-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.036.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Life expectancy[Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2026. Available in: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/life-expectancy.htm
Schneider L. US life expectancy is rebounding. JAMA.2025;334(10):849. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.10994.
New York State Department of Health. Life expectancy table[Internet]. Albany (NY): NYSDOH; [cited 2026 Feb 12]. Available in:https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/publications/docs/adm/06adm-5att8.pdf