medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación

ISSN 1405-8790 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab 2026; 38 (1)

Complications in patients with spinal cord injury at the Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación «Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra» from 2015 to 2023

Amador ACD, Barrera OA, Rodríguez BM, Quinzaños FJ
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/123365

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123365
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123365

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 12-17
PDF size: 824.69 Kb.


Key words:

spinal cord injury, complications, pressure injuries, spasticity, spasms, ASIA.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the incidence of spinal cord injury in Mexico is estimated at 18.1 cases per million inhabitants, with traumatic causes being the most common. It results in varying degrees of disability and is often associated with a range of complications that affect social participation and quality of life; among these, urinary tract infections and pressure ulcers are the most common. Objective: to describe the clinic and epidemiologic characteristics, as well as the main complications that occur in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) at the Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación «Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra». Material and methods: an observational, cross-sectional and comparative study was carried out in the Spinal Cord Injury Service, of patients with the diagnosis of spinal cord injury from 2015 to 2023. Results: 1,327 individuals were studied. The most frequent neurological level was the lower thoracic (30.8%) and the majority presented traumatic, complete spinal cord injury. 61.9% of subjects presented complications, of which, the most frequent ones were pressure sores, pain and spasticity. We found associations between the different complications and some clinical and sociodemographic variables. Conclusions: the majority of patients with spinal cord injury presented complications (69.1%) and the most frequent were pressure ulcers, pain, spasticity and spasms.


REFERENCES

  1. Ding W, Hu S, Wang P, Kang H, Peng R, Dong Y et al. Spinal cordinjury: the global incidence, prevalence, and disability from theGlobal Burden of Disease Study 2019. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47 (21): 1532-1540.

  2. Haisma JA, van der Woude LH, Stam HJ, Bergen MP, Sluis TA, PostMW et al. Complications following spinal cord injury: occurrenceand risk factors in a longitudinal study during and after inpatientrehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2007; 39 (5): 393-398.

  3. Galeiras Vázquez R, Ferreiro Velasco ME, Mourelo Fariña M,Montoto Marqués A, Salvador de la Barrera S. Actualización enlesión medular. Med Intensiva. 2017; 41 (4): 237-247.

  4. Barbiellini Amidei C, Salmaso L, Bellio S, Saia M. Epidemiology oftraumatic spinal cord injury: a large population-based study. SpinalCord. 2022; 60 (9): 812-819.

  5. Kumar R, Lim J, Mekary RA, Rattani A, Dewan MC, Sharif SY etal. Traumatic spinal injury: Global epidemiology and worldwidevolume. World Neurosurg. 2018; 113: e345-e363.

  6. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCISC). 2021annual statistical report: complete public version. Birmingham (AL):University of Alabama at Birmingham; 2021.

  7. Gedde MH, Lilleberg HS, Abmus J, Gilhus NE, Rekand T. Traumaticvs non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A comparison of primaryrehabilitation outcomes and complications during hospitalization.J Spinal Cord Med. 2019; 42 (6): 695-701.

  8. Pérez R, Martín CS, Renán S, Durán OS. Aspectos epidemiológicosde la lesión medular de la población del Centro Nacional deRehabilitación. Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab. 2008; 20 (3-4): 74-82.

  9. Mirzaeva L, Lobzin S, Tcinzerling N, Sarana A, Gilhus NE,Rekand T. Complications and mortality after acute traumaticspinal cord injury in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Spinal Cord.2020; 58 (9): 970-979.

  10. Neyaz O, Kanaujia V, Yadav RK, Sarkar B, Azam MQ, Kandwal P.Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in the himalayan rangeand sub-himalayan region: a retrospective hospital data-based study.Ann Rehabil Med. 2024; 48 (1): 86-93.

  11. Filipcic T, Sember V, Pajek M, Jerman J. Quality of life and physicalactivity of persons with spinal cord injury. Int J Environ Res PublicHealth. 2021; 18 (17): 9148.

  12. Wilson JR, Hashimoto RE, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG. Spinal cordinjury and quality of life: a systematic review of outcome measures.Evid Based Spine Care J. 2011; 2 (1): 37-44.

  13. Donhauser M, GrassnerL, Klein B, Voth M, Mach O, Vogel M etal. Severe pressure ulcers requiring surgery impair the functionaloutcome after acute spinal cord injury. Spinal cord. 2020; 58 (1):70-77.

  14. Andresen SR, Biering-Sorensen F, Hagen EM, Nielsen JF, Bach FW,Finnerup NB. Pain, spasticity and quality of life in individuals withtraumatic spinal cord injury in Denmark. Spinal Cord. 2016; 54(11): 973-979.

  15. Sangari S, Perez MA. Prevalence of spasticity in humans with spinalcord injury with different injury severity. J Neurophysiol. 2022; 128(3): 470-479. doi: 10.1152/jn.00126.2022.

  16. Westerkam D, Saunders LL, Krause JS. Association of spasticity andlife satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49 (9):990-994.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab. 2026;38