medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Crítica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • Policies
  • Lineamientos
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2026; 40 (3)

Capillary leak index as a risk factor for mortality independent of severity

Méndez CRY, Santana HGP, Valles GA, Galindo MCA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/123718

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123718
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123718

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 184-187
PDF size: 580.09 Kb.


Key words:

capillary leak syndrome, organ failure, capillary leak index, SOFA, severity, mortality.

ABSTRACT

Capillary leak syndrome (CFS) is defined as an acute and reversible increase in vascular permeability, characterized by hypotension, edema, and hypovolemia, which can progress to multiple organ failure. This explains the clinical triad: shock due to vascular collapse, hemoconcentration, and hypoalbuminemia, frequently accompanied by elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). A useful tool for estimating the magnitude of capillary leak is the capillary leak index (CFI). Values between 2.5 and 25 are considered normal, while values > 61 are associated with high mortality. In parallel, the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score remains a standard scale in intensive care units to assess organ dysfunction in six systems: respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal, and neurological. CFS is a severe, rapidly evolving syndrome with high mortality, whose early recognition is essential. The CFI is established as an independent prognostic factor that reflects the severity of endothelial dysfunction and vascular permeability. Its combined application with the SOFA score offers a comprehensive assessment of critically ill patients, facilitating risk stratification, therapeutic decision-making, and the design of interventions aimed at improving clinical outcomes.


REFERENCES

  1. Cordemans C, De Laet I, Van Regenmortel N, SchoonheydtK, Dits H, Huber W, et al. Fluid management in critically illpatients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominalhypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance. Ann IntensiveCare. 2012;2(Suppl 1):S1.

  2. De Backer D, Orbegozo Cortes D, Donadello K, VincentJL. Pathophysiology of microcirculatory dysfunction and thepathogenesis of septic shock. Virulence. 2013;5(1):73-79.

  3. Clarkson B, Thompson D, Horwith M, Luckey EH. Cyclical edemaand shock due to increased capillary permeability. Am J Med.1960;29:193-216.

  4. Nwadozi E, Claesson-Welsh L. Hypersensitive blood vessels inClarkson disease. J Clin Invest. 2024;134(10):e180795.

  5. Druey KM, Arnaud L, Parikh SM. Systemic capillary leaksyndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024;10(1):86. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00571-5.

  6. Muñoz-Guillén NM, León-López R, de la Cal-Ramírez MA,Dueñas-Jurado JM. Síndrome de fuga capilar sistémica:hipoalbuminemia, hemoconcentración y shock. A propósito deun caso. Semergen. 2014;40(2):e33-e36.

  7. Druey KM, Parikh SM. Idiopathic systemic capillary leaksyndrome (Clarkson disease). J Allergy Clin Immunol.2017;140(3):663-670.

  8. Lee WL, Slutsky AS. Sepsis and endothelial permeability. N EnglJ Med. 2010;363(7):689-691.

  9. Palacios Moguel P, Domínguez Borgua A, Camarena Alejo G,Aguirre Sánchez JS, Franco Granillo J. Índice de fuga capilarcomo una nueva herramienta pronóstica en el choque séptico.Med Crít (Col Mex Med Crít). 2018;32(3):141-146.

  10. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD,Scherag A, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for thethird International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and SepticShock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):762-774.

  11. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A,Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ FailureAssessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Onbehalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of theEuropean Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive CareMed. 1996;22(7):707-710.

  12. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J,Suter PM, et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidenceof organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of amulticenter, prospective study. Working group on “sepsis-relatedproblems” of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.Crit Care Med. 1998;26(11):1793-800.

  13. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, SprungCL, Sibbald WJ. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliabledescriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med.1995;23(10):1638-1652.

  14. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serialevaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically illpatients. JAMA. 2001;286(14):1754-1758.

  15. Pettila V, Pettila M, Sarna S, Voutilainen P, Takkunen OS.Comparison of multiple organ dysfunction scores in theprediction of hospital mortality in the critically ill. Crit Care Med.2002;30(8):1705-1711.

  16. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, GerlachH, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results ofthe SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(2):344-353. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000194725.48928.3a.

  17. Lu J, Dong Z, Ye L, Gao Y, Zheng Z. Predictive value of SOFA,PCT, Lactate, qSOFA and their combinations for mortality inpatients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2025;20(9):e0332525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332525.




CC BY-NC-ND

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Crit. 2026;40