medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2026; 40 (4)

Isolated, chronic bucket-handle meniscal tear: meniscectomy or meniscal repair?

Provenza G, Murillo-Vizuete D, Escobar-Antón D, López-Fernández J, Larrainzar-Garijo R, García-Bógalo R
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/124055

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/124055
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/124055

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 227-232
PDF size: 679.48 Kb.


Key words:

tibial meniscus injuries, meniscectomy, meniscal repair, knee joint, arthroscopy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: bucket-handle meniscal tears account for approximately 10% of all meniscal injuries. Although both meniscectomy and meniscal repair are considered valid treatment options, controversy remains regarding the optimal approach for chronic cases. This study aims to describe and compare the clinicalfunctional outcomes and the rate of complications or reoperations in patients with chronic, isolated buckethandle tears treated with either meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Material and methods: a retrospective study was conducted on patients treated between 2012 and 2021 at Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor. Patients with chronic, isolated bucket-handle tears treated with either meniscectomy or meniscal suturing were included. Demographic and clinical variables, time to surgery, postoperative follow-up, and functional outcomes (using IKDC and Lysholm-Tegner scores) were analyzed. Complications and reoperations were also recorded. Results: a total of 30 patients were included, 23 underwent meniscectomy and seven underwent meniscal repair. The meniscectomy group showed a significant improvement in IKDC scores from 39.1% preoperatively to 88.8% at one year, and 86.3% at final follow-up (four years), with no complications or reoperations. The repair group showed more modest improvements, from 38.9 to 82.3% over five years, but had a failure rate of 42.85%, requiring partial meniscectomy. Conclusion: both treatments are valid; however, delayed repair in chronic lesions may increase the risk of complications and the need for reintervention. Therefore, clinical protocols for bucket-handle meniscal injuries should be optimized.


REFERENCES

  1. Ardizzone CA, Houck DA, McCartney DW, Vidal AF, Frank RM. Allinsiderepair of bucket-handle meniscal tears: clinical outcomes andprognostic factors. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(13): 3386-93.

  2. Borner CE, Ruhmann O, Hehl S, Wirth CJ, Bohnsack M. Treatmentof incomplete meniscal lesions in athletes. Sportverletz Sportschaden.2005; 19(4): 200-4.

  3. Tuckman DV, Bravman JT, Lee SS, Rosen JE, Sherman OH. Outcomesof meniscal repair: minimum of 2-year follow-up. Bull Hosp Jt Dis.2006; 63(3-4): 100-4.

  4. Beatrice Tan JN, James Loh SY. An approach to chronic and displacedbucket handle meniscal tear-assessment, repair (push-and-pulltechnique), or salvage. Arthrosc Tech. 2021; 10(7): e1853-7.

  5. Abolaji Alabi I, Chernchujit B, Kanokvaleewong C, Artha A, Pena RJ.Arthroscopic procedure for chronic isolated bucket-handle meniscaltears. Arthrosc Tech. 2021; 10(2): e375-83.

  6. Mercier MR, Galivanche AR, Efthymiou L, Wilhelm CV, GrauerJN, Gardner EC. Bucket-handle meniscus tear managementwith meniscectomy versus repair correlates with patient,socioeconomic, and hospital factors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.2023; 31(11): 565-73.

  7. Wasserstein D, Dwyer T, Gandhi R, Austin PC, Mahomed N, Ogilvie-Harris D. A matched-cohort population study of reoperation aftermeniscal repair with and without concomitant anterior cruciateligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(2): 349-55.

  8. Cannon WD Jr., Vittori JM. The incidence of healing in arthroscopicmeniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed kneesversus stable knees. Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20(2): 176-81.

  9. Saltzman BM, Cotter EJ, Wang KC, Rice R, Manning BT, Yanke AB,et al. Arthroscopically repaired bucket-handle meniscus tears: patientdemographics, postoperative outcomes, and a comparison of successand failure cases. Cartilage. 2020; 11(1): 77-87.

  10. Haas AL, Schepsis AA, Hornstein J, Edgar CM. Meniscal repair usingthe FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(2): 167-75.

  11. Rockborn P, Messner K. Long-term results of meniscus repair andmeniscectomy: a 13-year functional and radiographic follow-up study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000; 8(1): 2-10.

  12. Stein T, Mehling AP, Welsch F, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Jager A. Longtermoutcome after arthroscopic meniscal repair versus arthroscopicpartial meniscectomy for traumatic meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med.2010; 38(8): 1542-8.

  13. Johnson MJ, Lucas GL, Dusek JK, Henning CE. Isolated arthroscopicmeniscal repair: a long-term outcome study (more than 10 years). AmJ Sports Med. 1999; 27(1): 44-9.

  14. Thaunat M, Fournier G, O’Loughlin P, Kouevidjin BT, Clowez G, BorellaM, et al. Clinical outcome and failure analysis of medial meniscus buckethandletear repair: a series of 96 patients with a minimum two yearfollow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 140(11): 1649-54.

  15. Ding DY, Tucker LY, Vieira AL, Freshman RD. Surgical outcomesafter bucket-handle meniscal repairs: analysis of a large containedcohort. Am J Sports Med. 2022; 50(9): 2390-6.

  16. Kalifis G, Raoulis V, Panteliadou F, Liantsis A, D’Ambrosi R,Hantes M. Long-term follow-up of bucket-handle meniscal repairs:chondroprotective effect outweighs high failure risk. Knee Surg SportsTraumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(7): 2209-14.

  17. Xu C, Zhao J. A meta-analysis comparing meniscal repair withmeniscectomy in the treatment of meniscal tears: the more meniscus,the better outcome? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(1): 164-70.

  18. Samuelsen BT, Johnson NR, Hevesi M, Levy BA, Dahm DL, StuartMJ, et al. Comparative outcomes of all-inside versus inside-out repairof bucket-handle meniscal tears: a propensity-matched analysis.Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6(6): 2325967118779045.

  19. Baratz ME, Fu FH, Mengato R. Meniscal tears: the effect ofmeniscectomy and of repair on intraarticular contact areas and stressin the human knee. A preliminary report. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14(4): 270-5.

  20. Vautrin M, Schwartz C. Future of 34 meniscectomies afterbucket-handle meniscus tear: a retrospective study with a followupover 22 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016; 26(4):435-40.

  21. Muench LN, Achtnich A, Krivec L, Diermeier T, Woertler K,Braun S, et al. Clinical outcome and healing rate after meniscalbucket handle tear repair. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1): 1063.

  22. Hupperich A, Salzmann GM, Niemeyer P, Feucht M, Eberbach H,Sudkamp NP, et al. What are the factors to affect outcome and healingof meniscus bucket handle tears? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138(10): 1365-73.

  23. Costa GG, Grassi A, Zocco G, Graceffa A, Lauria M, Fanzone G, etal. What is the failure rate after arthroscopic repair of bucket-handlemeniscal tears? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J SportsMed. 2022; 50(6): 1742-52.




CC BY-NC-ND

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2026 Jul-Ago;40