medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación

ISSN 1405-8790 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab 2010; 22 (4)

Treatment in swallowing disorders with electric stimulation compared with conventional therapy in patients with neurological damage neurological moderate

Madrigal RL, Sánchez E, García L, Hernández L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 118-122
PDF size: 150.47 Kb.


Key words:

Swallowing disorders, dysphagia, electrical muscle stimulation, neuromuscular stimulation, neurological damage.

ABSTRACT

Antecedents: The children with neurological damage are vulnerable to impairments in deglutition. Methods: Scale were evaluated by clinical and videofluoroscopy to children with disorders of the mechanism of swallowing before and after treatment. Were divided into two groups: one received conventional therapy and other therapy with electrostimulation (VitalStim) both ten sessions. Results: Group with electrostimulation: 5 patients at beginning, 2 had swallowing inconsistent at the end 3 had swallowing enough. 3 of patients had a profuse drooling, and eventually was moderate. On videofluoroscopy, we observed significant changes in motility lingual presenting a p = 0.0238. Conventional therapy group: 3 patients, at beginning swallowing in 2 was messy at the end of treatment a patient had swallowing enough. Two of patients had profuse drooling, while at the end of treatment 3 had severe drooling. Videofluoroscopy showed lingual motility disturbances in 2 and 1 with pharyngeal residue. At the end of therapy there was clinical improvement in all parameters studied, but without statistical significance.Conclusions: The use of electrostimulation is an effective treatment method for alteration of the mechanics of swallowing.


REFERENCES

  1. Nam-Jong P. Dysphagia. EMedicine Instant Access to the minds of Medicine 2004.

  2. Saud BM, Szyjkowski RD. A diagnostic approach to dysphagia. Clinics in Family Practice 2004: 6(3).

  3. Waldowski K. E-Stim for dysphagia 2005. Advance Newmagazines.

  4. Colin D, Rudolph MD, Thompson LD. Feeding disorders in infants and children. Pediatric Clinics of North America February 2002: 49(1).

  5. Bascuñana AH. Disfagia neurológica. Generalidades. Características en el accidente vascular cerebral, en el traumatismo craneoencefálico y en la parálisis cerebral infantil. Rehabilitación (Madr) 1998; 32: 331-336.

  6. Reilly S, Skuse D. Prevalence of feeding problems and oral motor dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: A community survey. Journal of Pediatrics December 1996: 129(6).

  7. Dawodu ST. Swallowing disorders. EMedicine Instant access to the minds of medicine 2003.

  8. Steele C. Treating dysphagia with EMG biofeedback. The ASHA Leader 2004: 2-23.

  9. Yorick W, Freed M. VitalStim Therapy. Training manual for the use of electrical stimulation in the treatment of dysphagia. 3-194.

  10. Leelamanit V, Limsakul C, Geater A. Synchronized electrical stimulation in treating pharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope 2002; 112(12): 2204-2210.

  11. Park CL, O’ Neill PA, Martin DF. A pilot exploratory study of oral electrical stimulation on swallow function following stroke: An innovative technique. Dysphagia 1997; 12: 161-166.

  12. Hockstein NG, Samadi DS. Sialorrhea: A management challenge. American Family Physician 2004: 69.

  13. Terré-Boliart R, Orient-López F, Guevara-Espinosa D. Disfagia orofaríngea en pacientes afectados de esclerosis múltiple. Rev Neurology 2004; 39(8): 707-710.

  14. Farzad S, Jeffrey W, Raj T. Poster board 110: electrical stimulation for dysphagia a case study and review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil March 2005; 84(3): 231.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab. 2010;22