medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2010; 70 (3)

Correlational study of body mass index, abdominal perimeter and prostate gland volume in patients with obstructive urinary symptomatology due to prostate growth

Aguilar-Barradas J, García-Irigoyen C, Manzanilla-García HA, Castro-Ibarra M, Martínez-Hernández MC, Acevedo-García C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 141-145
PDF size: 356.66 Kb.


Key words:

body mass index, prostate specific antigen, lower urinary tract symptoms, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a disease that is clinically characterized by a series of lower urinary tract signs and symptoms (LUTS) due to growth of the prostate. Obesity is excessive accumulation of body fat; general adipose tissue hypertrophy.
Objective: To determine whether or not there is a relationship between body mass index, abdominal perimeter and prostate gland volume obtained by transrectal ultrasound.
Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was carried out on 123 patients from June to December 2008. Medical history was taken, anthropometric measurements were made and transrectal ultrasound was done. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to body mass index (BMI): normal ‹ 24.9 kg/m2; overweight: 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2; and obese: › 30.0 kg/m2. They were divided into 2 groups according to abdominal perimeter (AP): normal: ‹ de 90 cm and obese: › 90 cm. Statistical analysis was done with Windows SPSS 15.0 program. Pearson correlation coefficient was used for simple 2-variable correlation.
Discussion: The present study used transrectal ultrasound to more precisely determine prostate volume, as is shown in the literature. However, when variables were analyzed no relation was observed between BMI and prostate volume. A positive linear relation was established between abdominal circumference and prostate volume with correlation between both variables, but this relation was not statistically significant due to sample size and age stratification. There was also no relation seen between prostate volume and patient weight or height.
Conclusion: Even though there was a correlation between study values it was not statistically significant. Further studies with larger patient sample sizes are suggested so that statistically significant relations can be established.


REFERENCES

  1. Wein JA, Kavoussi RL, Novick CA, et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9ª. Edición. México. Saunders-Elsevier. 3; 2007:2727–2765.

  2. Navarro BIE, Ruano GD, Gutzens GU. Diccionario terminológico de ciencias médicas; 13ª. Edición. México. MASSON. 2000; 603.

  3. Pruthi RS, Swords K, Schultz H. The Impact of Obesity on the Diagnosis of Prostate Cáncer Using a Modern Extended Biopsy Scheme. J Urol 2009;181(2):574-577.

  4. Nandeesha H. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Dietary and Metabolic Risk Factores. Int Urol Nephrol 2008;40(3):649-656.

  5. Errejón A, Moreno AJ. Primer Consenso Nacional de Hiperplasia Prostática Benigna. Col Mex Urol México 2003;7–10.

  6. Chang IH, Han JH, Ahn SH. Association of Obesity With Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Specific Antigen Velocity in Healthy Young Men. J Urol 2008;179(3):886-890.

  7. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults--The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res 1998;6 Suppl 2:51S-209S.

  8. Littman AJ, White E, Kristal AR. Anthropometrics and Prostate Cancer Risk. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165(11):1271-1279.

  9. Aguilar YA, Purg SPJ, Luna LLMA, et al. La autoestima y su relación con el índice de masa corporal al culminar la adolescencia. Rev Mex Ped 2002;69(5):190–193.

  10. Bates TS, Reynard JM, Peters TJ. Determination of prostatic volume with transrectal ultrasound: A study of intra-observer and interobserver variation. J Urol 1996;155(4):1299-1300.

  11. Lepor H, Nieder A, Feser J, et al. Total Prostate and Transition Zone Volumes, and transition Zone Index Are Poorly Correlated with Objective Measures of Clinical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol 1997;158(1):85-88.

  12. Sajadi KP, Terris MK, Hamilton RJ. Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy. J Urol 2007;178(3 Pt 1):990-995.

  13. Freedland SJ. Obesity and Prostate Cancer Importance of Race and Stage of Disease. J Urol 2007;178(5):1842-1843.

  14. Lee S, Min HG, Choi SH Central Obesity as a Risk Factor for Prostatic Hyperplasia. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14(1):172-179.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2010;70