medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2013; 58 (3)

Histopathological findings in dermis after the application of monophasic vs biphasic hyaluronic acid

Ramírez HYL, Montes BJJ, Molinar L, Jorge DL, de la Garza HH
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 134-138
PDF size: 425.27 Kb.


Key words:

Egyptian rats, hyaluronic acid, collagen, tissue reaction.

ABSTRACT

Background Hyaluronic acid has been more used since 1996, as it is considered a safe method to give volume and deal with defective tissue, that meets the requirements of biocompatibility, ease of application, long-lasting results, safety and cost-effectiveness. There are two types of hyaluronic acid: the two-phase and single-phase, developed by different companies.
Objective To determine the histopathological findings in the skin of Egyptian rats following application of monophasic versus biphasic hyaluronic acid at 15 and 30 days.
Material and method An experimental study was performed. We applied mono and biphasic intradermal hyaluronic acid on the back of Egyptian rat. Biopsies were taken at 15 to 30 days. Subsequently, a histopathological study of each one of the samples was made to determine the tissue reaction.
Results There were not rats that underwent significant changes with monophasic hyaluronic acid at 15 days, while one showed chronic inflammation at 30 days. With biphasic hyaluronic acid a rat showed reaction to foreign body to 15 days, and three rats had chronic inflammatory and granulomas at 30 days.
Conclusions Rats have a great response to foreign body forming granulomas and chronic inflammatory tissue with biphasic hyaluronic acid at 30 days.


REFERENCES

  1. Bachelier J. DERMYAL Relleno de ácido hialurónico posicionamiento y estudio clínico. J Med Chir Derm 2009:1-7.

  2. Ojeda G. Rellenos faciales inyectables: revisión de la literatura. Act Otorrinolaringología Cirug Cabeza y Cuello 2008;36:73-84.

  3. Bonnetblanc JM. Propriétés Pharmacologiques de L’acide Hyaluronique. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2001;9- 12.

  4. Brandt F. Hyaluronic acid fillers: Restylane and Perlane. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 2007;15:63-76.

  5. Bennett R. Anatomy and physiology of the skin. In: Papel ID, editor. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme, 2002;5-12.

  6. Lowe NJ, Maxwell A, et al. Hyaluronic acid skin fillers: adverse reaction and skin testing. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:930-933.

  7. Flynn TC, et al. Comparative histology of intradermal implantation of mono and biphasic hyaluronic acid fillers. Dermatol Surg 2011;375:637-643.

  8. Wang F. In vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skin. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:155-163.

  9. Rejuvenation of the aging face meeting. January 19-23, 2010. San Diego California: http:// www.aafprs.org




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Otorrinolaringología. 2013;58