medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2013; 12 (4)

Advantages of embolization in patients with placenta accreta

Campos-Bolaños GA, Enríquez-García R, Guerrero-Avendaño G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 236-240
PDF size: 279.17 Kb.


Key words:

placenta accreta, embolization, multiparity.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Placenta accreta is defined as an abnormal implantation of the placenta on the uterine wall, of varying severity due to the partial or complete absence of the decidua basalis. Diagnosis is achieved by obstetric ultrasound and complemented with application of Doppler and magnetic resonance. The most relevant risk factors are: multiparity, youth, dilation and curettage, and prior cesarean section. Due to the increase in the latter, the number of patients at risk of presenting placenta accreta is greater. It is among the leading causes of obstetric bleeding, mainly in the immediate postpartum, which conditions increased maternal morbidity and mortality due to both the disorder itself and its treatment, which consists of partial or total hysterectomy (the latter most commonly). The objective was to evaluate transoperative behavior with special attention to bleeding and prove its reduction in patients subjected to embolization.
Materials and methods. A retrospective study was conducted in 21 patients with diagnosis of placenta accreta in variable degree, attended in the period between January 2010 and June 2013, of whom 8 were subjected to embolization prior to the surgical event.
Results. To date we have performed eight embolizations in patients with placenta accreta. All the patients included, except 2, were multiparous with prior cesarean sections. The diagnosis was achieved with the aid of ultrasound and application of color Doppler. Embolization was satisfactory in 8 patients, given that they did not present bleeding in puerperium. In hysterectomy the maximum volume of bleeding was 1,800 cm3; however, this occurred in an interval of 3 to 7 days after embolization. In most patients hysterectomy was performed in patients who had had the desired number of children.


REFERENCES

  1. Noguera S, Karchmer KS, Rabadán MC, Sánchez P. Acretismo placentario, un problema en aumento. El diagnóstico oportuno como éxito del tratamiento 2013;81(2):99.

  2. Lira J, Ibargüengoitia F, Argueta M, Karchmer S. Placenta previa-accreta y cesárea previa. Experiencia de cinco años en el Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1995;63:337-340.

  3. Subirá J, Casanova C, Padilla P, Bergoña V, Perales P, Peñares M. Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2012;55(2):80-84.

  4. Vedantham S, Goodwin SC, McLucas B. et al. Uterine artery embolization: an underused method of controlling pelvic hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:938– 948.

  5. Chou MM, Tseng JJ, Ho ES, Hwang JI. Three dimensional color power Doppler imaging in the assessment of uteroplacetal neovascularization in placenta previa increta/percreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1257-60.

  6. Torres O, Buebo F, González R, Bronda A, Pinedo M. Ligadura de las arterias iliacas internas en cirugía obstétrica. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2001;67:6.

  7. Hans PD, Dürig P, Schnatterbeck P, Triller J. Percutaneous Treatment of Placenta Percreta Using Coil Embolization. Journal of Endovascular Therapy 2003;10(1):158–162.

  8. Deux JF, Bazot M, Le Blanche AF, et al. Is selective embolization of uterine arteries a safe alternative to hysterectomy in patients with postpartum hemorrhage? AJR 2001;177:145–149.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2013;12