medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Clínica de la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Costa Rica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Clin Esc Med 2016; 6 (2)

Lesiones Producidas por Escudos Eléctricos

Flores SG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 708.52 Kb.


Key words:

Electroshock weapon, Stun shield, Physical injuries, Forensic sciences.

ABSTRACT

Currently the police officers use a variety of electroshock devices to control people through the power supply, including electrical contact shields, devices whose purpose is to protect the user rather than the attack. The effect of exposure to external sources of electricity can cause injury by altering the normal electrical functions of the human body. Should be understood that there are risk factors, multiple variables impossible to control by users of the devices: uncontrollable factors that increase the intensity and duration of exposure to the current electric, such as injuries caused by falling of the person to the ground and potential risk factors (previous heart disease, intoxication, etc.) that may be unfamiliar by police officers when used with either with one or more people, and they can endanger the life of the person or people receiving the shock. In the scene, this shield becomes a physical clue to be protected and properly taken up considering that it may be decisive for the clarification of the issues, requiring therefor proper chain of custody. However, the very little research on harmful to health by discharges of electrical shields, causes no standards for the protection and safety in relation to its use to be known by the researchers who attend a scene where these devices are possible located, except for the standards of protection for any electrical equipment. The expert analysis requires assessing evidence with rigor criticism to establish and rebuild the mechanism and dynamics of the issue, indicating whether or not this device was used, providing evidence for the identification of the author.


REFERENCES

  1. 1.! Laima S Fomin D Jasulaitis A Andriu! kevi"i#t$ G Chmieliauskas S Sabaliauskas V y otro. The effect of conducted electrical weapons on the human body. Acta Med Litu 2014; 21: 73–80.

  2. 2.! Committee on Corrections. Conditions of Confinement on the Use of Stun Shields by de New York City Department of Correction. The Record 2001; 56(4): 536-561.

  3. 3.! TAR Ideal Concepts Ltd. Escudo eléctrico para disturbios. Detalle del producto. [Internet]. Israel: TAR Ideal Concepts Military and police equipment & training - one stop shop. [citado 4 Ago 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.tarideal.com/esp/Soluciones /AGENTES_POLICIALES/ESCUDOS/ TA03050/ESCUDO_ELECTRICO_PA RA_DISTURBIOS

  4. 4.! Madrigal C. Sala Constitucional prohíbe el uso de escudos eléctricos que causaron quemaduras a reo. [Internet]. Costa Rica: laprensalibre.cr. [actualizado 20 Ago 2015; citado 18 Set 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.prensalibre.cr/Noticias/detal le/37246/361/sala-constitucionalprohibe- el-uso-de-escudos-electricosque- causaron-quemaduras-a-reo

  5. 5.! Miranda H. Preso en La Reforma sufrió quemaduras. Sala condena uso de escudo eléctrico contra un presidiario. Resolución no prohíbe que se emplee en casos graves como motines. [Internet]. Costa Rica: La Nación. [actualizado 21 Ago 2015; citado 18 Set 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.nacion.com/sucesos/poderjudicial/ Sala-condena-escudo-electricoreo_ 0_1507249294.html

  6. 6.! Rojas P. En pleito por comida, reo sufre golpiza y descarga eléctrica en La Reforma. [Internet]. Costa Rica: crhoy.com NOTICIAS 24/7. [actualizado 20 Ago 2015; citado 18 Set 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.crhoy.com/en-pleito-porcomida- reo-sufre-golpiza-y-descargaelectrica- en-la-reforma/

  7. 7.! Reos denuncian uso de escudos eléctricos en la reforma . [Internet]. Costa Rica: Extra Tv. [actualizado 4 Sep 2015; citado 16 Oct 2015]. Disponible en: www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFA6CRT 6wAg

  8. 8.! Aguilar-Pallarès A Morante-Barragán JF Novelle-Rodríguez M Subirana- Domènech M. Armas eléctricas: ¿qué sabemos? ¿qué ignoramos?. Cuad Med Forense 2013;19(3-4):75-86

  9. 9.! Pérez L (Redactor). NTP 400: Corriente eléctrica: Efectos al atravesar el organismo humano. [Internet]. España: Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo; 1995. [citado 26 Nov 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.insht.es/InshtWeb/Contenid os/Documentacion/FichasTecnicas/NTP /Ficheros/301a400/ntp_400.pdf

  10. 10.! Azadani PN Tseng ZH Ermakov S Marcus GM Lee BK. Funding source and author affiliation in TASER research are strongly associated with a conclusion of device safety. Am Heart J 2011; 162 (3):533-537

  11. 11.! Kroll MW Lakkireddy DR Stone JR Luceri RM. TASER Electronic Control Devices and Cardiac Arrests: Coincidental or Causal. Circulation 2014; 129:93-100

  12. 12.! The Expert Panel on the Medical and Physiological Impacts of Conducted Energy Weapons. The Health Effects of Conducted Energy Weapons. [Internet]. Ottawa, Canada: Council of Canadian Academies & Canadian Academy of Health Sciences; 2013. [citado 6 Oct 2015]. Disponible en: http://scienceadvice.ca/uploads/eng/asse ssments%20and%20publications%20an d%20news%20releases/cew/cew_fullre porten.pdf

  13. 13.! Kunz SN Grove N Fischer F. Acute pathophysiological influences of conducted electrical weapons in humans: A review of current literature. Forensic Sci Int 2012; 221:1-4.

  14. 14.! O'Brien AJ Thom K. Police use of TASER devices in mental health emergencies: A review. Int J Law Psychiatry 2014; 37: 420-426

  15. 15.! Jauchem JR. Exposures to Conducted Electrical Weapons (Including TASER® Devices): How Many and for How Long are Acceptable? J Forensic Sci 2015; 60: S116-S129.

  16. 16.! AELE Law Enforcement Legal Center. Taser® Electronic Control Devices (ECDs): An “Intermediate” Use of Force? AELE Mo L J 2010; (2):101- 109.

  17. 17.! Hi JD Miner JR Lakireddy DR Bultman LL Heegaard WG. Cardiovascular and Physiologic Effects of Conducted Electrical Weapon Discharge in Resting Adults. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13:589– 595

  18. 18.! Hudak LA Marti JJ Houry DE. Bilateral patellar tendon rupture after stun gun shock. Injury 2011; 42: 186–188

  19. 19.! New York Times News Service. Jolt from electronic riot shield fatal for state prison worker. [Internet]. USA: The Victoria Advocate. [actualizado 2 Dec 1995; citado 26 Nov 2015]. Disponible en: https://news.google.com/newspapers?ni d=861&dat=19951202&id=mVFSAAA AIBAJ& sjid=8jUNAAAAIBAJ&pg=2035 ,6160495&hl=en

  20. Bozeman WP Hauda II WD Heck JJ, Graham DD Martin BP Winslow JE. Safety and Injury Profile of Conducted Electrical Weapons Use by Law Enforcement Officers against Criminal Suspects. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 53(4): 480-489.

  21. 21.! Substations Committee of the IEEE Power Engineering Society. IEEE Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding. IEEE Std 80-2000. [Internet]. New York, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc; 2000. [citado 4 Ago 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.dee.ufrj.br/~acsl/grad/equip amentos/IEEE-std80.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Clin Esc Med. 2016;6