medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 07

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2016; 84 (07)

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with Cyberknife® as a model of accelerated partial breast irradiation in Mexico. Dissymmetry and acute morbidity

Ortiz-Arce CS, Chagoya-González A, Olmedo-Valladares E, Velázquez-Trejo JJ, Gutiérrez-Márquez JG, Madrid-González OA, Huerta-Bahena J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 420-427
PDF size: 363.48 Kb.


Key words:

Breast cancer, Adjuvant radiotherapy, Partial breast irradiation, Radiosurgery, Radiotherapy planning.

ABSTRACT

Background: Actually the breast cancer is more and more diagnosed at early stage. For those cases, breast conservative treatment (breast conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation) is commonly used since many years. New radiation modalities particularly accelerated partial breast irradiation, have been recently developed in a subgroup of patients with early breast cancers who present clinical characteristics associated with low rates of local recurrence.
Objetive: We present the technique and our first results using radiosurgery with CyberKnife® as a model of accelerated partial breast irradiation.
Methods: Clinical, prospective, randomized and comparative study of partial irradiation techniques in the breast was made, including an arm for treatment with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife® in two different doses: 1) 22.5 Gy in 3 Fx , and 2) of 30 Gy in 5 Fx, with BED 45 and 50 Gy , respectively. To evaluate the aesthetic results digital photographs were taken before starting and after end of treatment. The analysis of variance one-way and Tukey test was used to assess dosimetry, conformality, uniformity and doses received in the “risk organ”.
Results: In 95% of planning volume was covered with top isodose 70%, with average coverage of 97%. Conformality and new conformality index of 1.28 and 1.34 were for doses of 22.5 Gy and 30 Gy, respectively. Acute dermal morbidity was Grade I, mainly in the quadrant of the breast treated with partial irradiation. After a year of follow-up, we observed a patient with breast faillure outside of the quadrant treated with partial irradiation.
Conclusion: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife ® is a safe and effective alternative in patients with breast cancer in early clinical stages treated with conservative surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER). Cancer Statistic Review, National Cancer Institute, 2013

  2. Arthur DW, Vicini F. Accelerated partial breast irradiation as a part of breast conservation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1726-1735.

  3. Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, et al. Radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in small breast carcinoma: long-term results of a randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2001;12:997-1003.

  4. Snaders ME, Scroggins T, Ampil FL, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 207;25:996-1002.

  5. Haas JA, Reed W, Andrews J, et al. Cyberknife radiosurgery for early stage breast cancer: early results and technique from the Winthrop-University Hospital Pilot Study. SRS/ SBRT Scientific Meeting 2012.

  6. Vermeulen S, Cortrutz C, Morris A, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: using the Cyberknife as the radiation delivery platform in the treatment of early breast cancer. Front Oncol 2011;43(1):1-8.

  7. Bondiau PY, Lallement M, Bahadoran P, et al. Cyberknife et chimiotherápie néoadjuvante pour les tumeurs du sein localement évoluées: résultats préliminaires. Cancer Radiother 2009;13:79-84.

  8. Bondiau PY, Bahadoran P, Lallement M, et al. Robotic stereotactic radioablation concomitant with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol 2009;7(4):1041-1047.

  9. Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, et al. Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol 2010;76(3 Suppl):S10-19.

  10. Histrov B, Lin SH, Christodouleas JP. Radiation oncology. A question based review. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams and Wilkins, 2011.

  11. Berrang TS, Olivotto I, Kim DH, et al. Three year outcomes of a Canadian Multicenter Study of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation using conformal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol.2011;81(5):1220-1227.

  12. Cox JD, STetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity Criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol 1995;3(5):1341-1346.

  13. Kuerer HM, Julian TB, Strom EA, Lyerly HK, Giuliano AE, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation after conservative surgery for breast cancer. Ann SUrg 2004;239:338-351.

  14. Goggin LM, Descovich M, McGuinnes C, Shiao S, Pouliot J, Park C. Dosimetric comparison between 3-dimensional conformal and robotic SBRT treatment plans for accelerated partial breast radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2015;Sep 2:pii:1533034615601280.

  15. NSABP B-39, RTOG 0413: A randomized Phase III Study of conventional whole breast irradiation versus partial breast irradiation for women with stage 0,I, II breast cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2006;4(10):719-721.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2016;84