medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas

Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2017; 22 (2)

Factors associated to permanence in intermittent hemodialysis of incident patients with chronic kidney disease without social security and in extreme poverty

Cantú-Quintanilla G, Hueda-Morales DL, Raña-Custodio A, Gómez-Guerrero I, Barragán-Sánchez A, Netzahualcóyotl-Hernández YS, Silva-García CG, Valdez-Ortiz R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 53-60
PDF size: 964.67 Kb.


Key words:

Intermittent hemodialysis, Chronic kidney disease, Extreme poverty.

ABSTRACT

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health problem in Mexico. Social and economic inequalities have an impact on access to health services. Currently, the Mexican health system does not guarantee a full coverage of patients with kidney disease requiring substitutive therapy and its integral handling. In recent years, chronic diseases in Mexico have been growing, favoring the development of CKD and mainly affecting economically unprotected sectors of population.
Objective: Research on factors associated to permanence under high-density lipoprotein of patients with CKD without social security coverage. Patients in intermittent hemodialysis (IH) are those who are not in a fixed shift of chronic hemodialysis and incidentally come to the hospital to receive treatment.
Methodology: A survey was applied to patients with CKD under IHD at the Nephrology Service of Hospital General de México. Sociodemographic data, clinical and laboratory variables, and potential reasons to remain in IHD were acquired.
Results: 64 questionnaires were obtained, with average age of 44 years; 60% were male. Among reasons studied to remain under IHD, 50% admitted to being not willing to have a co-responsibility in handling and learning of a peritoneal dialysis; 39% mentioned economic reasons.
Conclusions: Results show a population of patients with CKD without social security coverage under IHD, with a low sociocultural level, and with a poverty level. Admission of 39 patients (76 5%) is less than 3,500 pesos per month.


REFERENCES

  1. Jha V, García-García G, Iseki K, et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):260-72.

  2. http://data.worldbank.org/country/mexico (Acceso el 12 de agosto del 2015).

  3. Knaul FM, González-Pier E, Gómez-Dantés O, et al. The quest for universal health coverage: achieving social protection for all in Mexico. Lancet. 2012;380(9849):1259-79.

  4. Correa-Rotter R. Renal replacement therapy in the developing world: are we on the right track, or should there be a new paradigm? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(6):1635-6.

  5. Franco-Marina F, Tirado-Gómez LL, Estrada AV, et al. [An indirect estimation of current and future inequalities in the frequency of end stage renal disease in Mexico]. Salud Publica Mex. 2011;53 Suppl 4:506-15.

  6. Lozano R, Gómez-Dantés H, Garrido-Latorre F, et al. Burden of disease, injuries, risk factors and challenges for the health system in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(6):580-94.

  7. Malaquías LC. Enfermedad renal crónica y su atención mediante tratamiento sustitutivo en México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2009.

  8. De Moura L, Prestes IV, Duncan BB, Thome FS, Schmidt MI. Dialysis for end stage renal disease financed through the Brazilian National Health System, 2000 to 2012. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:111.

  9. Herrera AP, Palacios GM, Hernández AV. Alta tasa de interrupción de hemodiálisis en pacientes del Hospital Nacional 2 de mayo de Perú. Nefrología, Diálisis y Trasplante. 2014;34(2):94-8.

  10. Navarro-Reynoso F. Hospital General de México 107 Anniversary. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex. 2012;75:73e5.

  11. Guerra GVT, Díaz MAE, Vidal AK. La educación como estrategia para mejorar la adherencia de los pacientes en terapia dialítica. Revista Cubana de Enfermería. 2010;26(2)52-62.

  12. Kammerer J, Garry G, Hartigan M, Carter B, Erlich L. Adherence in patients on dialysis: strategies for success. Nephrol Nurs J. 2007;34(5):479-86.

  13. López CM, et al. Enfermedad renal crónica y su atención mediante tratamiento sustitutivo en México. Facultad de Medicina, UNAM; 2009. p. 103.

  14. Rodríguez ZMC. Calidad de vida en pacientes nefrópatas con terapia dialítica. CONAMED. 2008;13 Suppl 2:15-22.

  15. Contreras F, Esguerra G, Gutiérrez C, Fajardo L. Calidad de vida y adhesión al tratamiento en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica en tratamiento de hemodiálisis. Univ Psychol Bogotá (Colombia). 2006;5(3):487-99.

  16. Wiebe JS, Christensen AJ. Health beliefs, personality, and adherence in hemodialysis patients: an interactional perspective. Ann Behav Med. 1997;19(1):30-5.

  17. Estefan GJ, Cantú QG. Dilemas éticos en la provisión de diálisis en México. Entre la necesidad y la realidad. Revista de Nefrología Mexicana. 2012;33(4):140-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Esp Med Quir. 2017;22