Vaillard JE, Martínez AF, Huitzil MEE

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 51-58
PDF size: 375.86 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Holistic evaluation for stomatological clinical competencies can be a good tool to identify breaks between instructional objectives and your teaching method.
Objective: Propose a holistic evaluation design as an evaluative research of formative, ecological, naturalistic type, integrator for clinical competencies of the stomatologist.
Method: In an educational, experimental, prospective, comparative study, the scope of a holistic evaluation using eight indicators was analyzed with mixed methods. The sample was organized by groups (n = 4), students (n = 72), teachers (n = 35) as interest groups involved in the teaching process. It was conducted with ethnographic observation and in-depth interview in the student groups and a validated questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = .8660) applied to clinical teaching staff.
Results: The groups evaluated holistically increased the treatments (Ts = 8.38, p = 0.001), the group average was similar (Ts = .235, p = 10) Relationship treated patientsdaily clinical time (4 hours ICC = 0.586, p = .01) Teacher update = 8.5%. The syntagmatic analysis of the students that revealed insufficient time, teacher conflict, evasion of responsibilities, expectations about grades was performed. The analysis showed inconsistencies between school administration-organization, inadequate teaching profiles, and insufficient / doubtful income. He explained the critical path of learning clinical skills, teachers do not know / confuse the objectives of the clinical courses and the evaluation process.
Conclusions: The proposal is effective for the achievement of learning clinical skills. The mixed type methodology allows a better interpretation of the phenomenon and facilitates decision making

REFERENCES

1. Andrade Cázares, RA. El enfoque por competencias en educación. [Internet] Ide@s CONCYTEG 2008;39(8):53-64. [Citado: 2019, mayo 25]. Disponible en: https://sices.guanajuato. gob.mx/resources/ideas/ebooks/39/descargas.pdf

2. Newble, DJ. Assessing clinical competence at the undergrade level. Med. Ed. 1992;26:504-11.

3. Horst J, Clarck M, Lee A. Observation, assisting, apprenticeship: Cycles of visual and kinesthetic learning in dental education. J. Dent Ed. 2009;74(1):919-33.

4. Urbankova A, Engebretson S. Computer-assisted dental simulation as a predictor of preclinical operative dentistry performance. J. Dent Ed. 2011;75(9):1249-55.

5. Gordon William J. Sinética. El desarrollo de la capacidad creadora. 1.ª ed. México, DF: Ed. Herrero hermanos sucesores; 1963. PP. 214.

6. Girija C. How learning techniques initiate simulation of human mind. Ed. Res. Rev. 2014;9(17):606-9.

7. Halalau A, Falatko J, Mi M. Application of adult learning theory in teaching evidence-based medicine to residents. J. Med. Ed. 2016;15(4):185-93.

8. Pouresmaeil Z, Sahebe S. Two approaches to teaching/learning nursing psychomotor skills: self-directed/paced learning and lecture/demonstration-based instructions. J. Med Ed. 2001;1(2):106-11.

9. Nunez D, Taleghani M, Wathen W, Abdellatif H. Typodont versus Live Patient: Predicting Dental Students’ Clinical Performance. J. Dent Ed. 2012;76(4):407-13.

10. Gómez-Clavel JF. Desarrollo y validación de un cuestionario para evaluar la docencia clínica odontológica. (CEDCO) en la Fes Iztacala de la UNAM. Rev. Odont. Mex. 2008;12(3):120-25.

11. Alcaraz-Salarliche N. Aproximación histórica a la evaluación educativa: de la generación de la medición a la generación ecléctica. Rev. Iberoamericana Eval Ed. 2015;8(1):11-25.

12. Mora-Vargas AI. La evaluación educativa: concepto, períodos y modelos. [Internet] Rev. Electr. Act. Inv. Ed. 2004;4(02). [Citado: 3 de mayo de 2019]. Disponible en: https://revistas. ucr.ac.cr/index.php/aie/article/view/9084/17481

13. Pérez-Juste R. La evaluación de programas educativos: conceptos básicos, planteamientos generales y problemática. Rev. Inv. Ed. 2000;18(2):261-87.

14. Nolla-Domenjó M, Palés-Argullós J. Instrumentos de evaluación y sus características. En: Núñez-Cortés J, Palés-Argullós J, Rigual-Bonastre R, eds. Guía para la evaluación de la práctica clínica en las facultades de medicina. Instrumentos de evaluación e indicaciones de uso. 1.ª ed. Madrid: Unión editorial; 2014. pp. 33-44.

15. Mossey P, Newton JP. The Structured Clinical Operative Test (SCOT) in dental competency. British Dent. J. 2001;90(7): 387-90.

16. Cabra-Torres F. La evaluación y el enfoque por competencias: tensiones, limitaciones y oportunidades para la innovación docente en la universidad. Rev. E. A. N. 2008;63:91-106.