medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 49

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2024; 13 (49)

Immediacy in health: RSS technology

Michán-Aguirre L, Romero-Pérez MM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 120-128
PDF size: 440.66 Kb.


Key words:

Really Simple Syndication, digital tool, immediacy, RSS reader.

ABSTRACT

We are currently in the digital era, where the virtual format and computational technologies have made great progress in biological sciences research. The use of information is simpler and more eficient if an appropriate process is followed and the relevant resources are applied for each function, which is why there are a large number of tools to generate, process, share and analyze it, for example, Really Simple Syndication (RSS) or also called really simple syndication, refers to a family of ‘web feed’ formats. It helps connect users with those sources that are of interest to them to keep them updated through intelligent monitoring and greatly simpliples the task of 􀁭nding useful information. The user receives notifications in one place every time an update occurs, without having to consult different sources such as websites, video channels, social media accounts, magazines and news.
Unlike other communication channels such as email or social networks, simple syndication is one-way, starting with the feeds to which the user has subscribed and ending when the user receives the updates in a reader. RSS, the process does not involve any other interaction, it is a direct communication made up of simple and useful units of information. The syndication of web content through standard formats such as RSS has become an increasingly popular mechanism for disseminating and receiving new health information, for example, the topic of COVID-19, which has been of importance in recent years. This is one of the minimalist, ad-free, direct and open technologies that we invite you to use, implement and share.


REFERENCES

  1. Hull D, Pettifer SR, Kell DB. Defrosting the Digital Library:Bibliographic Tools for the Next Generation Web. PLOS ComputBiol. 31 de octubre de 2008;4(10):e1000204. Disponible en:https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000204.

  2. Berners‐Lee T, Cailliau R, Groff J, Pollermann B. World‐WideWeb: The Information Universe. Internet Res. 1 de enerode 1992;2(1):52-8. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb047254.

  3. Yang K, Hu Y, Qi H. Digital Health Literacy: BibliometricAnalysis. J Med Internet Res. 6 de julio de 2022;24(7):e35816.Disponible en: https://www.jmir.org/2022/7/e35816.

  4. Dobrecky L. Hacia la library 2.0: blogs, rss y wikis. El Profesionalde la Información. 1 de enero de 2007;16(2):138-42.Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2007.mar.09.

  5. Leary PR, Remsen DP, Norton CN, Patterson DJ, Sarkar IN.uBioRSS: Tracking taxonomic literature using RSS. Bioinformatics.1 de junio de 2007;23(11):1434-6. Disponible en:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm109.

  6. Jenssen BP, Desai BR, Callahan JM. Randomized ControlledTrial of RSS Reader Use and Resident Familiarity With PrimaryLiterature. Journal of Graduate Medical Education.1 de junio de 2014;6(2):341-4. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00249.1.

  7. Farrell AM, Mayer SH, Rethlefsen ML. Teaching Web 2.0Beyond the Library: Adventures in Social Media , the Class.Medical Reference Services Quarterly. Julio de 2011;30(3):233-44. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590413.

  8. McLean R, Richards BH, Wardman JI. The effect of Web 2.0on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinianevolution or folksonomic revolution? Medical Journalof Australia. 2007;187(3):174-7. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590413.

  9. Insall R. Science Twitter — navigating change in science communication.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Mayo de 2023;24(5):305-6. Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41580-023-00581-3.

  10. Vidal Valero M. Thousands of scientists are cutting back onTwitter, seeding angst and uncertainty. Nature. 17 de agostode 2023;620(7974):482-4. Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02554-0.

  11. Brembs B, Lenardic A, Chan L. Mastodon: a move to publiclyowned scholarly knowledge. Nature. 23 de febrero de2023;614(7949):624-624. Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00486-3.

  12. Bastian H. How Is Science Twitter’s “Mastodon Migration”Panning Out?. Absolutely Maybe. 2023. Disponibleen: https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2023/08/20/how-isscience-twitters-mastodon-migration-panning-out/.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2024;13