medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2004, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2004; 26 (3)

Approach to the cervical esophagus

Etchegaray-Dondé A, Hurtado-López LM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 169-172
PDF size: 162.94 Kb.


Key words:

Cervical esophagus, neoplasms, esophageal surgery, recurrent laryngeal nerve.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Traditionally, the cervical esophagus has been approached obliquely. Our concept is that the transverse approach is another access route, with good exposure and low morbidity. We present the experience of our surgical team.
Patients and methods: Retrospective, descriptive, transversal study in 21 patients subjected to a transverse approach of the cervical esophagus. We analyzed direct variables such as visualization of structures, exposure, lesions, fistulae, stenosis, and accidents.
Results: Transverse approach to the esophagus was performed in 21 patients, 8 with benign pathology and 13 with malignant pathology. From the eight patients with benign pathology, three coursed with Zenker diverticulum, three with perforations, and two had lesions caused by caustic burns. The patients with malignant pathology corresponded to eleven with esophageal cancer, two with tumors of the esophagogastric junction. An excellent exposure of the structures was achieved in all patients, even in three patients that were re-operated. We had two patients with lesions of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, only one (4.7%) was left with a permanent lesion. Three (14.7%) patients presented an anastomotic fistula, two of them developed stenosis. No patient presented vascular lesions (accidental, esophageal, or of the airways).
Discussion: Comparing our results with those reported in the world literature, we found less frequency of recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions, and less or equal fistulae and stenoses. Besides this approach has the advantage of being able to extend the incision to approach the right side when necessary and, from our point of view, produces better esthetic results.
Conclusion: The transverse approach of the esophagus is a safe route, with low morbidity, with the same or better exposure than the oblique approach.


REFERENCES

  1. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 392-400; discussion 400-3.

  2. De la Garza VL, Cortés GR. Tratamiento quirúrgico del divertículo faringoesofágico o de Zenker. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 1996; 61: 320-6.

  3. McKeown KC. Total three-stage esophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 1976; 63: 259-62.

  4. Endo M, Kawano T, Nagai K. Operative procedures of T1 cancer of the lower thoracic esophagus. [Abstract] Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1997; 98: 737-41.

  5. Hirano M, Tanaka S, Fujita M, Fujita H. Vocal cord paralysis caused by esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102(3 Pt1): 182-5.

  6. Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D, Bains MS, Turnbull AD, Karpeh M, et al. The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 198: 42-50.

  7. Gelfand GA, Finley RJ. Quality of life with carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Surg 1994; 18: 399-405.

  8. Yoshino K, Kawano T, Nagai K, Endo M. Diagnosis and treatment of complications after oesophagoplasty. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 791-6.

  9. Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 634-40.

  10. Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 342-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2004;26