medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica

ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Simulación Clínica 2019; 1 (3)

Evaluation of the retention of simulation-based learning in cross-cutting procedural competencies

Jarry C, Vidal C, Varas J, Poblete R, Abbott E, Vega E, Zamorano E, Letelier LM
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/RSC193B

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/RSC193B
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/RSC193B

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 123-128
PDF size: 190.11 Kb.


Key words:

Simulation, procedural competences, medical education.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Given a progressively more restricted clinical context, also strongly oriented to the minimization of risk for patients, the exposure of medical students to procedures in patients has gradually decreased. Medical simulation allows training and acquisition of procedural skills, however the retention of this knowledge through time has not been widely studied. Objective: To assess the retention of transversal procedural skills once trained in simulation. Material and methods: An evaluation tool was elaborated in order to assess transversal procedural competencies, defined as those common and needed abilities to perform most of invasive medical procedures. Medical students were included in their eighth semester, who had received simulation training in these competencies during their sixth semester. The assessment tool was applied through an objective structured clinical evaluation to the selected students. Results: 108 students were included. The average achievement percentage for the set of transversal competences was 95.83% in the initial evaluation and 91.31% for the final evaluation (approximately one year later). The percentage of final achievement was not correlated with that obtained in the initial assessment, not with previous exposure to procedures or age. Conclusions: About one year after the training, an acceptable percentage of achievement was demonstrated in the realization of the transversal skills trained, evaluated by means of an objective structured clinical evaluation. The knowledge acquired is retained for a considerable period even when the skills learned are not practiced regularly in a real clinical setting.


REFERENCES

  1. Burford B, Whittle V, Vance GHS. The relationship between medical student learning opportunities and preparedness for practice: A questionnaire study. BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14 (1): 1-8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-223.

  2. Corvetto M, Bravo M, Montaña R, et al. Simulación en Educación Médica: una sinopsis. Investig en Educ Médica. 2014; 3 (10): 100-105. doi:10.1016/S2007-5057(14)72733-4.

  3. Utili Ramírez F, Ramírez FU. Simulación en el aprendizaje, práctica y certificación de las competencias en medicina. ARS MEDICA Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2007; 36 (2): 152. doi: 10.11565/arsmed.v36i2.154.

  4. Okuda Y, Bryson E, DeMaria S, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009; 76 (4): 330-343. doi:10.1002/msj.20127.

  5. Beyer-berjot L, Palter V, Grantcharov T. Simulation-based surgical education advanced training in laparoscopic abdominal surgery?: A systematic review. Surgery. 2014; 156 (3): 676-688. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.044.

  6. Choy I, Okrainec A. Simulation in surgery: perfecting the practice. Surg Clin North Am. 2010; 90 (3): 457-473. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.011.

  7. Varas J, Mejía R, Riquelme A, et al. Significant transfer of surgical skills obtained with an advanced laparoscopic training program to a laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy in a live porcine model: Feasibility of learning advanced laparoscopy in a general surgery residency. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2012; 26 (12): 3486-3494. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2391-4.

  8. Altamirano P, Gonzalez R, Hanne C, Moreno R, Muñoz M, Pantoja MA. Perfil de Conocimientos EUNACOM. Segunda versión. 2010; 2: 59. http://www.eunacom.cl/contenidos/PerfilNew.pdf.

  9. Villagrán I, Tejos R, Chahuán J, et al. Percepción de estudiantes de pregrado de Medicina de talleres de simulación de procedimientos médico-quirúrgicos. Educación Médica. 2018; 146: 649-658.

  10. Carr J, Deal AM, Dehmer J, et al. Who teaches basic procedural skills: Student experience versus faculty opinion. J Surg Res. 2012; 177 (2): 196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.084.

  11. Castillo R, Buckel E, León F, et al. Effectiveness of learning advanced laparoscopic skills in a brief intensive laparoscopy training program. J Surg Educ. 2015; 72 (4): 648-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.01.016.

  12. Nestel D, Groom J, Eikeland-Husebø S, O’Donnell JM. Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: the state of the science. Simul Healthc. 2011; 6 (Suppl. 7): S10-3. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318227ce96.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Simulación Clínica. 2019;1