medigraphic.com
ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente

2025, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Simulación Clínica 2025; 7 (3)

Prebriefing: evidence of its implementation ten years after the introduction of the concept

Rodríguez-Vera F, Canales-Vergara M, Villegas-Muñoz V, Parada-Uyarte JM

Language: Spanish
References: 38
Page: 113-123
PDF size: 530.14 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: prebriefing is a pre-simulation session that establishes the context and instructions necessary to meet learning objectives. Despite its relevance, there is a lack of consensus on its definition and associated practices. Objectives: to analyze the practices linked to prebriefing according to the Delphi consensus and to assess the quality of systematic reviews on the topic. Material and methods: the PRISMA-ScR protocol was followed, reviewing databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and Scielo using the terms "prebriefing" OR "briefing" AND "training, simulation" between February and April 2025. Quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 instrument. Results: 940 articles were found, of which 12 were selected after purging duplicates and non-relevant articles. Six articles of relevant content were identified, with two of high quality and four of critically low quality according to AMSTAR-2. Conclusions: the concept of prebriefing remains complex, with a limited literature that makes consensus on its definition and components difficult. This underscores the need for further research to clarify its implementation.


REFERENCES

  1. Díaz-Guío DA, Cimadevilla-Calvo B. Educación basada en simulación: debriefing, sus fundamentos, bondades y dificultades. Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica. 2019; 1 (2): 95-103.

  2. Sheykhmohammadi N, Atashpendar A, Zampunieris D. High-fidelity simulation pre-briefing with digital quizzes: Using INACSL standards for improving effectiveness. In: Poquet O, Ortega-Arranz A, Viberg O, et al. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on computer supported education (CSEDU 2024). 2024, pp. 412-419). SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications. Available in: https://doi.org/10.5220/0012682500003693

  3. McDermott DS. Seeking consensus on "Prebriefing": Preparing students for simulation-based learning (Order No. 3734765). 2015. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1734038151).

  4. Page-Cutrara K. Use of "Prebriefing" in nursing simulation: a literature review. Journal of Nursing Education. 2013; 53 (3): 136-141.

  5. McDermott DS, Ludlow J, Horsley E, Meakim C. Healthcare simulation standards of best practice™. Prebriefing: preparation and briefing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021; 58; 913. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.008

  6. Meakim C, Boese T, Decker S, et al. Standards of best practice: simulation standard I: Terminology [Supplemental material]. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013; 9: s3-s11.

  7. Rodgers BL. Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. J Adv Nurs. 1989; 14: 330-335.

  8. Waxman KT. The development of evidence-based clinical simulation scenarios: Guidelines for nurse educators. J Nurs Educ. 2010; 49 (1): 29-35. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090916-07

  9. Beverly JDB. Pre simulation strategies: Do they increase student learning, confidence, and/or simulation participation? Clinical Simulation in Nursingm. 2011; 7 (6): e248. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.09.016

  10. Brewer EP. Successful techniques for using human patient simulation in nursing education. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011; 43 (3): 311-317. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01405.x

  11. Miller KK, Riley W, Davis S, Hansen HE. In situ simulation: a method of experiential learning to promote safety and team behavior. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008; 22 (2): 105-113.

  12. Blazeck A. Simulation anxiety syndrome: Presentation and treatment. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011; 7 (2): e57-e60. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.05.002.

  13. Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014; 9 (6): 339-349. Available in: http://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047

  14. Onda E. Situated cognition: Its relationship to simulation in nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2012; 8: e1-e8. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.11.004

  15. McDermott DS. The "Prebriefing" Concept: A Delphi study of CHSE experts. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016; 12 (6): 219-227. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.02.001

  16. Penn J, Voyce C, Nadeau JW, Crocker AF, Ramirez MN, Smith SN. Optimizing interprofessional simulation with intentional prebriefing and debriefing. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2023; 14: 1273-1277.

  17. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169 (7): 467-473. Available in: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

  18. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

  19. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(10), 1013-1020. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009

  20. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358: j4008.

  21. Henrico K. Psychological safety during a large-scale simulation-based learning event. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South. 2024; 8 (1): 34-55. Available in: https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v8i1.340

  22. Barzegar M, Boushehri E, Amini M, et al. What happened to simulation-based education in outpatient setting in the 21st century: a scoping review. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024; 12 (2): 69-78. Available in: https://doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2023.100297.1885

  23. Das S, Ahmed SM, Murry LL, Garg R. Simcrafting: a comprehensive framework for scenario development for simulation. Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68 (1): 31-35. Available in: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1262_23

  24. Lackie K, Hayward K, Ayn C, et al. Creating psychological safety in interprofessional simulation for health professional learners: a scoping review of the barriers and enablers. J Interprof Care. 2023; 37 (2): 187-202. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2052269

  25. Tong LK, Li YY, Au ML, Wang SC, Ng WI. Prebriefing for high-fidelity simulation in nursing education: a meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2022; 119: 105609. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105609

  26. Tong LK, Li YY, Au ML, et al. High-fidelity simulation duration and learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2022; 116: 105435. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105435

  27. Silva CCD, Natarelli TRP, Domingues NA, Fonseca LMM, Melo LL. "Prebriefing" in clinical simulation in nursing: scoping review. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2022; 43(spe): e20220067. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2018.20220067.en

  28. Filomeno L, Minciullo A. High-fidelity simulation for the education of nursing students: a scoping review of the literature. Prof Inferm. 2021; 74 (2): 180-189. Available in: https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2021.7423180

  29. Halamek LP, Cady RAH, Sterling MR. Using briefing, simulation and debriefing to improve human and system performance. Semin Perinatol. 2019; 43 (8): 151178. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2019.08.007

  30. León-Castelao E, Maestre JM. "Prebriefing" en simulación clínica: análisis del concepto y terminología en castellano. Educación Médica, Volumen. 2019; 20 (4): 238-248. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.12.011

  31. Kolbe M, Grande B, Spahn DR. Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: content, structure, attitude and setting. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015; 29 (1): 87-96. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002

  32. Kilpatrick K, Paquette L, Jabbour M, et al. Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams. PLoS One. 2020; 15 (6): e0234416. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234416

  33. Groom JA, Henderson D, Sittner BJ. National League for Nursing-Jeffries Simulation Framework state of the science project: Simulation design characteristics. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2014; 10 (7): 337-344.

  34. Meakim CH, Fey MK, Chmil JV, Mariani B, Alinier G. Standards of best practice: Simulation standard IX: simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2015; 11 (6): 309-315. Available in: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.03.005

  35. Chamberlain J. "Prebriefing" in nursing simulation: a concept analysis using Rodger's methodology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2015; 11 (7): 318-322. Available in: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.003

  36. The INASCL Board of Directors. Standard I: Terminology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011; 7 (4S): s3-s7. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.05.005

  37. Page-Cutrara K. "Prebriefing" in nursing simulation: a concept analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2015; 11 (7): 335-340. Available in: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.001

  38. El Hussein M, Harvey G, Kilfoil L. Pre-brief in simulation-based experiences: a scoping review of the literature. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021; 61: 86-95. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.003




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com